🔴 بهرهبرداری تشکیلات بهایی از نفوذی خود در سازمان ملل علیه ایران #بهاییت 🔻بر اساس خبر منتشر شده توسط منبع رسمی تشکیلات بهایی نازیلا قانع (بهایی. گزارشگر ویژه سازمان ملل در امور آزادی مذهب یا عقیده) گزارش خود را به شماره (A/81/376) با عنوان «آزادی مذهب یا عقیده و حقوق مربوط به خاکسپاری در شرایط استثنایی» به کمیته سوم مجمععمومی سازمان ملل متحد در بیست و پنجمین نشست عمومی ارائه داده است. 👈 ادامه مطلب را در سایت سر…

Channel
سراب حقیقت☯️🕎✝️☪️
@sarabehaghighat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,632subscribers
-1,474 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001113471117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sarabehaghighat |
| Description | 🪯🕉☸️✡️ ☯️🕎✝️☪️ 🆘 پایگاه تخصصی نقد و بررسی ادیان و فرق انحرافی ▫️ سایت سراب حقیت https://sarabehaghighat.ir/ https://farsnews.ir/Sarabehaghighat 📺تلوزیون اینترنتی: www.aparat.com/sarabehaghighat ✉️ پاسخگویی @Elalhabib14 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sarabehaghighat |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:18 | 21,632 | -17 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:57 | 21,649 | -20 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 21,669 | -15 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:04 | 21,684 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 21,696 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 21,713 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:24 | 21,721 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 21,730 | -31 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:40 | 21,761 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 21,770 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 21,783 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 21,793 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 21,807 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 21,822 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 21,846 | -20 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 21,866 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 21,883 | -29 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 21,912 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 21,922 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:11 | 21,924 | first reading |
Engagement
515 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.533%
- avg views ÷ 21,632 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 115
- 62 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.441%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 62
- of 515 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 515 (11 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,151 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,370
- Videos
- ≈928
- Links
- ≈1,790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7h 01m
- Average length
- 3m 12s
Measured directly from 132 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 45 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 74.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 515 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 515 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 وحدت اسلامی؛ ترور علمای وحدتگرا، پرده از چهره واقعی دشمنان اسلام برمیدارد #کلیات_ادیان_و_فرق #وحدت_اسلامی 🔻روز شنبه ۱۶ آبانماه ۱۴۰۵، مولوی شمسالحق (یوسف) قاضی، فرزند مولوی الیاس و امام جمعه محترمآباد از توابع شهرستان فنوج، در پی تیراندازی افراد مسلح ناشناس در محور محترمآباد به سمت فنوج به شهادت رسید. وی هنگام تردد در این محور هدف حمله مسلحانه قرار گرفت. در پی اصابت گلوله به خودرو، وسیله نقلیه از مسیر منحرف …
🔴 کاسبی با نام ایران؛ خلوت یهودی ایرانیتبار با دیپلمات کودککش! #یهودیت 🔻در بحبوحهی تحرکات و آمادگی آمریکای جنایتکار و رژیم خونخوار صهیونیستی برای تحمیل یک جنگ همهجانبه علیه ملت ایران، لابیهای ضدایرانی در نیویورک نیز به تکاپو افتادهاند. 👈 ادامه مطلب را در سایت سراب حقیقت مطالعه کنید. 🌏 سراب حقیقت | پایگاه تخصصی نقد و بررسی ادیان و فرق انحرافی ➡️ @sarabehaghighat
🔴 «خلط مبحث الهیاتی»؛ نقدی بر تلاش یک صفحه اینستاگرامی برای توجیه تقدیس آتش با استناد به آیات قرآن #زرتشت 🔻اخیراً صفحه اینستاگرامی «رسول مهرآیین» با انتشار ویدئویی از سخنان موبد نیکبین، موبد زرتشتیان اصفهان، در جمعی از دانشجویان در آتشکده این شهر، تلاش کرده است با استناد به متون یهودیت، مسیحیت و آیات قرآن کریم، جایگاه آتش در آیین زرتشتی را با مفاهیم الهیاتی ادیان ابراهیمی همسو نشان دهد. در این محتوا، با تکیه بر م…
🎬 جلسات تبیینی وحدت فریقین؛ جلسه اول 🎤 حجت الاسلام و المسلمین مهرانفر (استاد حوزه و دانشگاه) 🔹اختلاف بین مذاهب امری طبیعی است اما برخورد نادرست با آن بسیار مخرب است. وحدت یک اصل و ضرورت دینی و عقلایی است البته وحدت به معنای کنار گذاشتن حقیقت نیست بلکه رسیدن به تفاهم و فهم مشترک، است. بهترین الگوی وحدت که خود در متن این جریانات بودند، اهل البیت علیهم السلاماند. برای دیدن محتواهای بیشتر نقد ادیان و فرق انحرافی به س…
💠وحدت، دستور حضرات معصومین علیهمالسلام 🔵آیتالله سید محمد سعید حکیم: 🛑تکفیر صحابه و مسلمانان با هر مذهبی که باشند، از اعتقادات شیعیان نیست. 🔹 این امر برخاسته از روح اسلام و ارکان آن است. 🔹 این نکته در خلال احادیث نقل شده از امامان شیعه و از فتواها و سخنان علمای آنان فهمیده میشود. 📚فی رحاب العقیده، ج۱، ص۳۴. ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ #وحدت #شیعه #سنی #دشمن 🌏 سراب …
🔴 ادعای شبکه تبشیری «هفت» درباره شکستهشدن دو تابوی سیاسی در هفته گذشته #مسیحیت #مسیحیت_تبشیری 🔻شبکه تبشیری «هفت» در یکی از برنامههای اخیر خود با اشاره به اظهارات برخی نمایندگان مجلس شورای اسلامی، مدعی شکستهشدن تابوی ساخت بمب اتم در ایران شد. این برنامه با اشاره به فتوای پیشین رهبری مبنی بر حرمت تسلیحات هستهای، اظهارات جدید برخی نمایندگان مبنی بر «واجبتر بودن بمب اتم از نان شب» را مورد انتقاد قرار داد و طرح چنی…
🔴 بازدید مدیر حوزههای علمیه کشور از مرکز فام؛ «فرق، ادیان، مذاهب و معنویتهای نوظهور» #فِرق_ادیان_مذاهب 🔻آیتالله اعرافی، مدیر حوزههای علمیه کشور، به همراه حجتالاسلام والمسلمین ملکی، قائممقام حوزه علمیه قم، و حجتالاسلام والمسلمین مردانپور، معاون تبلیغ و امور فرهنگی حوزه علمیه قم، از مرکز فام (فرق، ادیان، مذاهب و معنویتهای نوظهور) وابسته به معاونت تبلیغ حوزه علمیه قم بازدید کردند. 👈 ادامه مطلب را در سایت سرا…
📹 نماهنگ | مسیر انحرافی 🔻 امام شهید آیتالله خامنهای: «ما در اوایل انقلاب جوانهایی را داشتیم که اینها مردمان مسلمانی بودند و برای اسلام وارد میدان شده بودند امّا چون مبانی معرفتیشان ضعیف بود، پایههای معرفتیشان محکم نبود -حالا به هر دلیلی محکم نبود- اینها جذب گروههای التقاطی شدند و از یک جوان مؤمن سالمِ اسلامطلب و مؤمن تبدیل شدند به کسانی که بر روی هممیهن خودشان اسلحه کشیدند، جوان را، پیر را، کاسب بازاری را هد…
🔴 طعنه خاتمی به اختلافات مسلمانان؛ غافل از بحرانهای اخلاقی و درونی فرقه خودش #معنویت_بدون_دین #اشو 🔻محسن خاتمی، از مروجان فعال و مترجم آثار «اشو» در ایران، به تازگی با انتشار فهرستی بلندبالا از فرقهها و نحلههای مختلف اسلامی در کانال تلگرامی خود، به اختلافات میان مسلمانان تاخته و آن را به سخره گرفته است. 👈 ادامه مطلب را در سایت سراب حقیقت مطالعه کنید. 🌏 سراب حقیقت | پایگاه تخصصی نقد و بررسی ادیان و فرق انحرافی…
💠برادران اهلسنت؛ جان ما هستند 🔵 آیتاللهالعظمی سیستانی حفظهالله: 🔷همانگونه که قبلا هم گفتهام میگویم نگویید «برادران ما اهل سنت»، بلکه بگویید «جان ما اهلسنت» و من به خطابه ائمه جمعه اهل سنت بیش از خطبای شیعه گوش میدهم و ما بین عرب و کرد تفاوتی قائل نیستیم و اسلام همه ما را جمع کرده است. 📚پیام آیت الله سیستانی به نخستین همایش علمای شیعه و سنی ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ…
❤1🤨1
🔴 الماسیجاف و سناریوی جدید پس از تغییر معادلات آمریکا؛ «کودتا علیه جمهوری اسلامی موفق بود» #معنویت_بدون_دین #فرقه_فرزندان 🔻کمال الماسی جاف، سرکرده فرقه انحرافی «فرزندان»، در پی پیروزی دموکراتها در انتخابات آمریکا و ناکامی نامزد مورد حمایتش (ترامپ)، با چرخشی آشکار در سناریوهای پیشگویی خود، این بار از «کودتای داخلی» و «اختلافات درونی» به عنوان عوامل حتمی سقوط جمهوری اسلامی ایران نام برده است. 👈 ادامه مطلب را در س…
Showing the 12 most recent of 515 posts we hold for @sarabehaghighat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sarabehaghighat named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 29 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 29 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@idk_i_never_knew · 1,567#1
@litera999 · 78,041#2
@Ghostoflibrary · 180#3
@pdfhayeketab · 9,944#4
@ketab_mamnouee · 79,722#5
@PDF_che · 1,040#6
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,679#7
@policy_org · 3,962#8
@Theaterstudies · 33,720#9
@ketab_jameh · 11,434#10
@fl_sisi · 7,329#11
@Aryan_Fakes_org · 1,345#12
@jung_redbook · 1,616#13
@ketabnayyab · 89,747#14
@atorabanorg · 8,659#15
@pdf_tarikhema · 46,328#16
@mylibraries · 73,887#17
@ketabkhaneolumegaribe · 5,851#18
@saranjoman · 3,938#19
@ketab_boob · 10,326#20
@telasm · 4,926#21
@nashremarkaz · 3,394#22
@RastarLib · 16,690#23
@ce7en · 7,441#24
@ScientificDialectics · 23,654#25
@book_soti1 · 14,481#26
@legendfolkepic · 20,681#27
@peopleintheattic · 14,821#28
@thisiszach · 246 (as read 21 September 2026)#29
@sYdShelter · 2,404#30
@booksiireadd · 5,938#31
@whyliterature · 9,641#32
@Dahaar · 10,406#33
@kierkegaard3 · 18,992#34
@Libraryculthashshashin · 5,028#35
@mehdiwrite · 972#36
@Aurelianomusicchannel · 747 (as read 21 September 2026)#37
@karkhane_org · 958#38
@frenchdaily1 · 1,127#39
@a1338xmmmm · 1,948#40
@danceinbroklyn · 1,143#41
@underatrillionstars · 3,392#42
@imaniTelegram · 1,955#43
@tinoushnazmjou · 1,211#44
@GlobalInformationNetwork_ir · 1,990 (as read 21 September 2026)#45
@sheykh_hares7175666 · 1,913#46
@nojomahkami · 2,754#47
@AmirHEtemadi · 2,175#48
@Notes_On_Liberty · 7,756#49
@kokermag · 1,953#50
@JOIN3AAA · 4,155#51
@marxismcenter · 2,330#52
@alaskaandtea · 24,455#53
@mes_observations · 4,050#54
@MeAutograph · 1,986#55
@Sourceofneuroscince · 7,870#56
@artchanel · 20,150#57
@AERT_6 · 9,017#58
@tabatabaei_quotes · 2,456#59
@kanoon_nevisandegane_iran · 5,947#60
@Gottfried24 · 991#61
@Our_Archive · 4,279#62
@estekhdam_kordestan · 5,407#63
@TEDpsychology · 5,622#64
@ilyarepinchanel · 434 (as read 21 September 2026)#65
@Tavaana · 6,089#66
@bidarzani · 4,150#67
@digitalakbari · 5,807 (as read 21 September 2026)#68
@priuuod · 822 (as read 21 September 2026)#69
@xHelterSkelterx · 3,978#70
@defier_media · 957#71
@gheyrat_kadeh · 209#72
@pygmalion_F · 114#73
@betweenthebarss · 1,019#74
@Newagebook · 3,416#75
@CINEMA_FOR_ALL_TIME · 261 (as read 21 September 2026)#76
@iNaghi · 2,419#77
@exmozik · 1,797#78
@ambiently · 1,649 (as read 21 September 2026)#79
@DEgrammophon · 2,320#80
@isingmyself · 1,640#81
@Artjoycollective · 1,255#82
@art_heja · 3,496#83
@Classical_Music_World · 6,563#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Library_Telegram · 110,410
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
@ketab_mamnouee · 79,722
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@mylibraries · 73,887
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سراب حقیقت☯️🕎✝️☪️” (@sarabehaghighat), 21,632 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarabehaghighat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.