International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,393. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100,243–102,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:00
100,452
-52
16 Sept 2026, 05:55
100,504
-71
14 Sept 2026, 09:18
100,575
-47
12 Sept 2026, 20:20
100,622
-57
10 Sept 2026, 21:17
100,679
-51
7 Sept 2026, 19:59
100,730
-60
4 Sept 2026, 23:40
100,790
-51
3 Sept 2026, 10:46
100,841
-27
2 Sept 2026, 01:56
100,868
+3
31 Aug 2026, 23:47
100,865
+45
30 Aug 2026, 21:18
100,820
-26
29 Aug 2026, 19:34
100,846
-15
28 Aug 2026, 17:54
100,861
-27
27 Aug 2026, 18:58
100,888
-44
26 Aug 2026, 19:03
100,932
-41
25 Aug 2026, 19:57
100,973
-36
24 Aug 2026, 22:08
101,009
-61
23 Aug 2026, 05:12
101,070
-59
21 Aug 2026, 14:16
101,129
-43
20 Aug 2026, 14:02
101,172
first reading
Engagement
1,713 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.79%
avg views ÷ 100,452 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,820
1,129 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.926%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,129
of 1,713 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,116 of 1,129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
1,713 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
8,834,306
Reactions total
81,601
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 09:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈65,900
Videos
≈47,500
Links
≈12,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 12m
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 248 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70,087 reactions across 989 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17,738
25.3%
😁
13,018
18.6%
🤣
11,982
17.1%
😡
10,865
15.5%
👎
8,809
12.6%
❤🔥
2,766
3.95%
😭
1,931
2.76%
🥴
1,760
2.51%
😘
492
0.702%
🕊
316
0.451%
😎
271
0.387%
💯
139
0.198%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 989 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Onlin_24. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⭕ژنرال رضایی: همکاری ایران با انصارالله مداخله است اما اقدامات عربستان نیست؟
ژنرال رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران، در واکنش به انتقادها درباره همکاری تهران با انصارالله یمن گفت: آیا عربستان با برخی گروهها در یمن ارتباط ندارد و به آنها سلاح نمیدهد؟ اگر چنین اقدامی انجام میدهد، آیا این مداخله نیست؟
او افزود: همکاری ایران با انصارالله مداخله تلقی میشود، اما اقدامات عربستان مداخله محسوب نمیشود؟
رضایی مدعی ش…
⭕ژنرال رضایی: میگویند کنترل بابالمندب به تحریک ایران انجام شده است
ژنرال رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران، گفت نیروهای یمنی به بابالمندب رفته، کنترل این منطقه را در دست گرفته و در آنجا مستقر شدهاند؛ اما برخی این اقدام را به تحریک ایران نسبت میدهند.
او افزود: اگر فردا اتفاق مشابهی در تنگه جبلالطارق رخ دهد، باز هم خواهند گفت این اقدام به تحریک ایران بوده است؛ در حالی که به گفته او، تهران چه اقدامی برای تحر…
⭕ژنرال رضایی: کشورهای عربی نباید اجازه دهند آمریکا از خاک آنها به ایران حمله کند
ژنرال رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران، از کشورهای عربی خواست به آمریکا اعلام کنند که اجازه استفاده از پایگاهها و خاک آنها برای حمله به ایران را نمیدهند.
او گفت ایران در دفاع از خود جدی است و اگر جنگ دیگری آغاز شود، پایگاههای هوایی آمریکا که محل برخاستن هواپیماهای مهاجم باشند، با شدت بیشتری هدف قرار خواهند گرفت.
رضایی تأکید کر…
یک بمبافکن B-1B Lancer آمریکا شامگاه امشب در حالی که با پسسوز کامل از پایگاه هوایی RAF Fairford در بریتانیا برخاست، فیلمبرداری شده است.
گفته میشود این بمبافکن احتمالاً عازم خاورمیانه است.
➣ @Onlin_24
ژنرال رضایی: در صورت فشار اقتصادی، شرکتهای آمریکایی را هدف قرار میدهیم
ژنرال رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران، هشدار داد اگر آمریکا برای مختل کردن روابط تجاری و مالی ایران اقدام کند، تهران در پاسخ، شرکتهای حفاری، تجاری و اقتصادی آمریکایی فعال در منطقه را هدف قرار خواهد داد.
او این رویکرد را «حمله در برابر حمله» توصیف کرد و گفت هدف، وارد کردن فشار متقابل به اقتصاد آمریکا خواهد بود.
رضایی همچنین به کشورهای …
ژنرال رضایی: چرا نیروهای زمینی آمریکا وارد ایران نمیشوند؟
محسن رضایی با اشاره به نقش نیروهای زمینی در جنگها گفت اگر آمریکاییها در ادعای خود جدی هستند، باید نیروهای نظامیشان را وارد خاک ایران کنند.
او پرسید چرا نیروهای هوابرد و زمینی آمریکا وارد ایران نمیشوند و واشنگتن به حملات هوایی اکتفا میکند و سپس نیروهای خود را از منطقه خارج میکند.
رضایی تأکید کرد که در نهایت این نیروهای زمینی هستند که میتوانند نتیجه جن…
ژنرال رضایی: در صورت آغاز دوباره جنگ، ناوهای آمریکا در اقیانوس هند هدف قرار میگیرند
ژنرال رضایی گفت اگر جنگ دوباره آغاز شود، کشتیهای آمریکایی در هر نقطهای از اقیانوس هند، در صورت باقی ماندن در این منطقه، هدف حملات ایران قرار خواهند گرفت.
او مدعی شد ایران توان موشکهای مافوقصوت خود را افزایش داده و سرعت آنها را از ۶ به ۱۰ ماخ رسانده است.
رضایی همچنین از توسعه سامانههای جنگ الکترونیک، تقویت پدافند هوایی و وجود …
ژنرال رضایی: ترامپ ایران را بهشدت دستکم گرفت
رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران، با انتقاد از عملکرد آمریکا در جنگ با ایران گفت ترامپ قدرت و ظرفیت ایران را بهشدت دستکم گرفته است.
او مدعی شد جنگ آمریکا با ایران از نظر بسیاری، جنگی «غیرمنطقی» و «احمقانه» است و آن را «جاهلانه» نیز توصیف کرد.
رضایی همچنین ادعا کرد اقدامات نظامی، اقتصادی و سیاسی آمریکا بر پایه ارزیابی دقیق و محاسبات صحیح انجام نشده و تحت تأثیر ا…
در حالی که تمام نگاه ها به قیمت نفت دوخته شده کمتر کسی متوجه است که این روزها حمل نفت در یک سوپرتانکر حامل ٢ میلیون بشکه به مقصد چین بشکه ای حدودا ٢۴ دلار یعنی بیش از ٢٠ درصد خود نفت هزینه دارد. رکورد بی سابقه ای است
➣ @Onlin_24
گزارش مردمی از بندرعباس؛ ادعای تخلیه مراکز نظامی
یک گزارش مردمی از بندرعباس مدعی شده است که به تمامی مقرهای نظامی این منطقه دستور تخلیه داده شده است.
➣ @Onlin_24
دراپ سایت :
بازگشت زودتر از موعد ترامپ از کمپ دیوید، ویدیوهایی از برخاستن بمبافکنهای B-1 از بریتانیا و هشدار امنیتی آمریکا به شهروندان این کشور در خاورمیانه، نگرانیها درباره احتمال آغاز دور جدیدی از تشدید تنش علیه ایران را افزایش داده
➣ @Onlin_24
👍9🥴3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,713 posts we hold for @Onlin_24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر سلامت @salamat_21 · 38,666 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
ایران خبر @Iraankhabari · 52,152 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
اخبار رسمی ایران و جهان @akhbarr_rasmi · 29,002 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
خبرلحظه ای @khabare_lahzei12 · 37,152 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026
اخبار فوری/ مهم🔖 @fouriAkhbar · 28,803 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
اخبارفوری/مهم 🔖 @Akhbar_Fourri · 53,914 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
ایران خبر @akhbare_irane · 44,216 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
اتاق خبر @otaghkhabarl · 81,202 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
مثلث خبر @mosaallas · 46,997 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
ایران نیوز @Iraani_news · 35,768 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
کتوزیست ketozist @ketozist · 44,711 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 September 2026
اخبار 20:30 🇮🇷 @akhbaar2030_ir · 62,215 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال آخرین قیمت @akharin_gheimat · 36,075 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 1 September 2026
Fars News | فارس نیوز @Farse_news1 · 176,572 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 August 2026
اخبار موثق @MOVASAGH_IR · 38,624 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
اخبارموثق📺 @akhbr_mvsgh · 88,578 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
اخبار،دلار،سکه،خودرو @Dollartala1 · 292,279 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
مهاباد خبر @mahabadkhbar · 34,963 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
📢 خبر فردا @akhbarfarda_com · 148,558 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
ایران خبر @irankhabar · 320,626 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
📣 خبر فوری ایران💯 @Kh_fouri · 122,794 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار فوری تهران🔖 @fouri_tehran · 213,141 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
خبر کوتاه فوری @kotah_fouri · 111,635 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
اتاق خبر @newsroom_irr · 85,753 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبر آنلاین” (@Onlin_24), 100,452 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Onlin_24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.