Channel
@Pastwrize
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
469,561subscribers
-92,158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001568689710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pastwrize |
| Description | 🐐 Support @AvAmeshkut |
| Created | 16 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pastwrize |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:58 | 469,561 | -380 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:17 | 469,941 | -19 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 469,960 | -75 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 470,035 | -334 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 470,369 | -470 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:15 | 470,839 | -631 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 471,470 | -400 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 471,870 | -488 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 472,358 | -550 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 472,908 | -611 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 473,519 | -590 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 474,109 | -594 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 474,703 | -592 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 475,295 | -674 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:11 | 475,969 | -594 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 476,563 | -626 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 477,189 | -820 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 478,009 | -592 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 478,601 | -677 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 479,278 | first reading |
1,705 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 584 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,705 (6 August 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 12,746,100 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Pastwrize. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 اینجا هر کارت یه داستان داره، هر چرخش یه غافلگیری! 💎 🥂 کازینو زنده ZOMABET | یه تجربه لاکچری، درست وسط هیجان! ✨ نورهای طلایی، میزهای حرفهای و دیلرهایی که هر دست رو به یه لحظه نفسگیر تبدیل میکنن! 🎰 از بلکجک و رولت تا کلی بازی متنوع؛ اینجا هر میز یه حالوهوای متفاوت داره! ⚡️ 🎁 بونوسهای ویژه ZOMABET: 🪙 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس واریز کریپتو 💵 ۳۰٪ بونوس واریز تومانی 💎 ۵۰ دلار بونوس ثبتنام 🌐 ZOMABET.COM ————11a عضویت در کانال …
شما یادتون نمیاد احمدی نژاد سفر استانی میرفت براش میخوندن دسته گل محمدی به شهر ما خوش آمدی:)))))
جدی جدی اگه اینا نرن برنامه چیه ؟ مگه تا کی میشه مسافرت نرفت مهمونی نگرفت دندون پزشکی بیخیال شد با گوشی ده سال پیش سر کرد لباس و کفش نو نخرید آجیل و گوشت و میوه رو فراموش کرد . ب فکر عوض کردن لوازم خونه نبود استرس جنگ داشته باشیم و پیگیر اخبار و انتخابات کشورای دیگه ؟ تا کی؟
تو یه موقعیتهایی بهم میگن عصبانی که من هنوز عصبانی نشدم.
وقتی وارد بانک میشی وضعیت کارمندهای بانک :
تا الان فکر میکردم فیکه این شاتا 😂😭
🔥⚔️ اینجا هر توپ یه نبرده، هر اشتباه یه تاوان! اورتون × نیوکاسل | جدال سرسختهای لیگ برتر انگلیس! یه طرف اورتون با جنگندگی و قدرت بدنی، یه طرف نیوکاسل با حملات سریع و فشار بیامان! 💣 👀 فکر میکنی آبیهای اورتون سه امتیاز رو شکار میکنن یا زاغهای نیوکاسل دست پُر برمیگردن؟ اورتون 🆚 نیوکاسل 🗓 ۱۱ آبان ⏰ ۲۳:۳۰ 🎁 بونوسهای ویژه ZOMABET: 🪙 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس واریز کریپتو 💵 ۳۰٪ بونوس واریز تومانی 💎 ۵۰ دلار بونوس ثبتنام 🌐 ZO…
خیلی بده که عاشق نسخهی قدیمی یه آدم باشید؛ باور کنید که تموم شده و بندازیدش سطل اشغال.
Pov: داری خفه میشی ولی ظرفیت سرفه رایگانت تو فضای عمومی رو استفاده کردی😶
درسته همه کسشرن ولی تو کسشر مورد علاقهم بودی.
براى من هیچوقت سكوت علامت رضا نبود هروقت سكوت كردم تو دلم فحش دادم
🐔🚦 چهار تا سوپراسپرت، یه جوجه، صفر درصد ترس! 🔥 🏎️ CHICKEN CROSS | مأموریت عبور از غیرممکن! 💥 لامبورگینی از یه طرف، فراری از اون طرف… ولی انگار رئیس این خیابون یه جوجهست! 😈 آسفالت خیس، چراغهای خیرهکننده و ماشینهایی که منتظر هیچکس نمیمونن! وسط این شلوغی، یه جوجه کوچولو قراره حسابی دردسر درست کنه! 🐥⚡️ 🎮 تو CHICKEN CROSS هر قدم یه تصمیم جدیده؛ ادامه بدی یا همینجا متوقف شی؟ هیجان بازی دقیقاً از همین انتخابها شر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,705 posts we hold for @Pastwrize. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پاستوریزه” (@Pastwrize), 469,561 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pastwrize.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.