Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чегодаев про Урал

Channel

Чегодаев про Урал

@ProUral

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,992subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413723645
TypeChannel
Username@ProUral
DescriptionПЛЫВУ ЧЕРЕЗ УРАЛ. ПОКАЗЫВАЮ И РАССКАЗЫВАЮ 16 апреля 2025 года начался мой проект УРАЛЬСКАЯ ОДИССЕЯ. Этот канал основной источник информации о ней. Меня зовут Олег Чегодаев, я уральский путешественник
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProUral

Growth

19,95920,01319,9866 August 2026 — 20,010 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,010 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,009 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,013 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,994 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,987 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,986 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,989 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,984 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,983 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,979 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,977 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,975 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,973 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,977 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,968 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,962 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,959 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,981 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,990 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,994 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,993 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,994 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,998 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,997 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,992 subscribers19,9926 August 20262 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,951–20,021 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:2319,992-5
1 Sept 2026, 11:5519,997-1
31 Aug 2026, 10:1319,998+4
30 Aug 2026, 10:2719,994+1
29 Aug 2026, 09:2419,993-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:1719,994+4
27 Aug 2026, 10:1319,990+9
26 Aug 2026, 12:5719,981+22
25 Aug 2026, 15:3519,959-3
24 Aug 2026, 16:4219,962-6
22 Aug 2026, 22:2819,968-9
21 Aug 2026, 13:1819,977+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:5319,973-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:5219,975-2
18 Aug 2026, 16:5519,977-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:1319,979-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:1219,983-1
15 Aug 2026, 11:4419,984-5
13 Aug 2026, 23:1619,989+3
12 Aug 2026, 16:2419,986first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 19,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held63 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total209,760
Reactions total9,006
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,550
Videos
496
Links
1,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25m 23s
Average length
2m 07s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,576 reactions across 57 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4,31337.3%
2,52821.8%
👍1,87516.2%
💩5945.13%
🤣5835.04%
😁4513.90%
🤬2872.48%
❤‍🔥2822.44%
💯1050.907%
😱900.777%
720.622%
🤔590.51%
🤡480.415%
😍300.259%
🙏290.251%
👏250.216%
👀240.207%
🥴240.207%
💊170.147%
🗿130.112%
24 further kinds1271.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,950 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,390 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026

3 -я серия #ледниковаяэкспедиция Смотрим ледники в районе озера Усваты и переплываем легендарное озеро Хадатаёганлор https://youtu.be/-v-iuqjhnG8?si=f68aLdXAcPjUGw1P

👍2322🔥11

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

2 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 3 September 2026

ЗАВТРА В УФЕ ❤️😊

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

2 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,030 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Приглашаем Вас вдохновиться просмотром DIY документального фильма об участии в самой сложной и экстремальной байкпакинг гонке - "Silk Road Mountain Race 2024"🚵🏼‍♂️ главный герой и автор идеи фильма - горный гид RMGA\KMGA Стас Горбачевский по приятной традиции вещает в Уфе о своем опыте участия в гонке, но уже через мультимедийный формат 🎥 после показа фильма можно лично будет лично пообщаться со Стасом и частью его

🔥20👍117🤮2

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

30 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC≈3,810 views176 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ИЗ БУДУЩЕЙ КНИГИ 42 ДЕНЬ... #уральская_одиссея_чегодаева Пару глотков холодной воды вместо завтрака, быстрые сборы, и в 4:30 я уже был на воде в надежде снять что-нибудь по утреннему красивому. Сперва всё шло по плану: солнце встало в верховьях реки, вновь осветив Дыроватый Камень. Это вызвало смешанные чувства. С одной стороны, я безусловно был рад красивому рассвету в красивом месте, с другой — досадовал, понимая,

🔥11041👍203❤‍🔥2

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

29 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈3,740 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026

КОРПОРАТИВНЫЙ ЧёС Чет последнее время стали приглашать выступать с рассказами про Урал, да еще за гонорары 😄 Если есть время не отказываюсь, и деньги не лишние и что может быть еще более важно, коплю опыт выступлений. Только на них можно получить некоторые важные скилы, которых мне не хватает. #амбассадор_уральских_гор Есть только одна проблема, не знаю сколько денег брать за выступление? Как думаете?

👍5320😁15👀2🤡2👏1🔥1

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

28 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈4,450 views297 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

САМАЯ МЕРЗКАЯ ФУТБОЛКА? Без ложной скромности этой идеей я горжусь особо. 🙂 Как-то давно придумал идею, не так давно реализовал. Издалека футболка в горошек, но стоит подойти поближе… люблю смотреть, как округляются глаза у людей 😄 и приковывается взгляд. И не удивительно, что она стала хитом продаж. Футболка «Акарофобия»… https://www.exje.ru/product/ticks Или удивительНО?)))) Надели бы такую? ))

😁146👍63🔥26😱2013👎7🤮7❤‍🔥5

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

28 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC≈4,160 views1,025 reactionsread 3 September 2026

РАЗВЕЛ КОСТЕР - УСТРОИЛ ПОМОЙКУ Согласен ставь 🔥 Не согласен ставь 💩 потом проанализируем 🙂 Речь про костры в дикой природе в необорудованных местах и особенно туристически популярных

💩584🔥415🤔15👍5🗿3🤡2👎1

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

27 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈4,400 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ну и главный вопрос как назовем новые водопады?

🤔18👍8

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

27 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈4,860 views292 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

+ 1 НОВЫЙ ВОДОПАД НА ЮЖНОМ УРАЛЕ Одной из целей летнего похода по Южному Уралу было обнаружение водопадов в районе горы Ямантау. Доходили слухи и видео об их наличии, но точных данных где они не было. А так это оставить было нельзя, южная половина Урала не так богата водовпадами, каждый на счету. В итоге проведя камеральную работу сузил круг поисков до одной реки. И результат не заставил себя ждать. Сразу как мин

🔥177👍7636🦄2❤‍🔥1

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

26 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTC≈4,420 views297 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ПРОБЛЕМА ДОСТИГНУТОЙ ЦЕЛИ Знаю, что у многих путешественников после окончания больших экспедиций (проектов) наступают жесткие психологические отходники. Когда выполнена цель на которую положил много времени и сил, очень часто возникает вакуум который нечем заполнить. У меня что то подобное в легкой форме было единожды, когда я закончил проект "Тысячники южного Урала". А потом я нашел лайфхак, придумал себе цель пра

163👍95💯17🔥10🤣8❤‍🔥4

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

25 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈5,160 views373 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ЗНАТНО ШАРАХАЕТ сегодня над Уфой! собрался уже было на покой, но тут началась красота.

🔥2386748👍17😱3

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

25 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC≈4,580 views156 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

МУКИ ВЫБОРЫ Какую панораму хребта Нары выбрать для открытки в серию #урал_откраядо_края ??

🔥10230👍19🤷‍♂3💔1😍1

Signed Oleg Chegodaev

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @ProUral. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЛЕСНЫЕ
@lesnue · 74,290
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чегодаев про Урал” (@ProUral), 19,992 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProUral.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.