💢محسن رضایی: شما در جنگ نظامی شکست خوردید و در جنگ اقتصادی نیز شکست خواهید خورد .
❤6🤣6

Channel
@ProxyToli
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
240,980subscribers
+2,609 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002168020561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProxyToli |
| Description | همه باهم برای ایران قشنگمون :) |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProxyToli |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ProxyToli/271544 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC | @Akhbar_fouriyyy/413526 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ProxyToli/271545 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC | @Akhbar_fouriyyy/413536 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ProxyToli/271563 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC | @Akhbar_fouriyyy/413717 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Akhbar_fouriyyy/413757 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC | @ProxyToli/271567 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Akhbar_fouriyyy/413326 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC | @ProxyToli/271568 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC | 1.00 | 44 hours |
| @ProxyToli/271544 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC | @PinkPillS/2053976 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Akhbar_fouriyyy | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Akhbar_fouriyyy (5–0) |
| @PinkPillS | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @PinkPillS (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @PinkPillS. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 240,980 | +776 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 240,204 | +876 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 239,328 | -452 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 239,780 | -451 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 240,231 | +187 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 240,044 | +334 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 239,710 | +1,144 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 238,566 | +692 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 237,874 | +944 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 236,930 | +242 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:12 | 236,688 | +343 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 236,345 | +445 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 235,900 | +634 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 235,266 | +642 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 234,624 | +601 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 234,023 | +720 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 233,303 | +891 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 232,412 | +652 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 231,760 | -318 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:39 | 232,078 | first reading |
1,411 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 218 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 465 of 601 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,411 (6 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 323,911 |
| Reactions total | 10,759 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 266 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,058 reactions across 585 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,798 | 70.5% | |
| 👍 | 964 | 8.72% | |
| 🔥 | 568 | 5.14% | |
| 🤣 | 543 | 4.91% | |
| 🤬 | 382 | 3.45% | |
| 🖕 | 256 | 2.32% | |
| 💔 | 185 | 1.67% | |
| 😱 | 144 | 1.30% | |
| 👎 | 122 | 1.10% | |
| 💘 | 52 | 0.47% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 0.199% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 0.145% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.054% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 608 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💢محسن رضایی: شما در جنگ نظامی شکست خوردید و در جنگ اقتصادی نیز شکست خواهید خورد .
❤6🤣6
💢عارف: ما به هیچوجه نگران تحریمها نیستیم، چونکه کشور ما در برابر تحریمها آبدیده شده است .
❤24🖕4🤣1
فیلم انگشت کردن عمه🗿 پسره عمشو انگشت میکنه اولش عمه میگه نکن زشته از سنت خجالت بکش ولی پسره بی خیال نمیشه اولش ی انگشتی انجام میده بعد دوتا انگشت میکنه تو سوراخ عمش 🇮🇷🔥 عمه هم خیس میشه شلوار پسره رو میکشه پایین براش میخوره بعدم داگی میشه و... 1⃣مشاهده پک اول از فیلماشون🥵 ❗️توجه توجه بنر فیک نیست ❗️ 2⃣مشاهده پک دوم از فیلم هاشون😜✌️ پک دومم ببین ضرر نمیکنی 🫦✅
❤58👍28🤣1
🔴 با توجه به شیوع طاعون در روسیه، همچنان پروازهای روسیه به ایران برقراره و طی چند روز اخیر، پروازهای مستقیم از مسکو به تهران انجام شده. احتمالا یکی از اولین جاهایی که دچار این بیماری بشه، ایرانه! .
❤39🤬25🔥24🤣1
🚨❗️تسنیم: استیضاح عراقچی در سامانه مجلس ثبت شد. .
❤37👍4
دختره به زیدش خیانت کرد😑💦 خیانت این دختر جـ,ــ,ـنده خانم🤤 هم به این دوست پسرش میده بعدش قایمکی تو ویلا کـ,ــ,ـیر پسر 18ساله رو میخوره انقدر خوب میخوره پسره ب نفس نفس میفته 😈ی پک کامل از دادنش هست خیلی سفید و حشـ,ــ,ـریه هرچی عکسشو میزاریم کاملا واقعیه! 1⃣مشاهده پک اول از فیلماشون🥵 ❗️توجه توجه بنر فیک نیست ❗️ 2⃣مشاهده پک دوم از فیلم هاشون😜✌️ هردوتا پک ببین چون عکسو فیلما بین دوتا پخش شده ضرر نمیکنی 🫦✅
❤21🤬8🔥7
چه زیبا میگه مولانا، مو به تن آدم سیخ میشه: وقتی که خوشحالی، میری پیش کسی که خیلی دوسش داری. وقتی که ناراحتی، میری پیش کسی که اون تورو خیلی دوست داره! خوشی تو را سوی محبوب و غم تو را سوی عاشق میکشاند! .
❤20
🔴 ایران هر روز ترسناکتر میشه، یه پدر برای اینکه پسر 3 سالهاش رو تنبیه کنه، یه بسته مداد رنگی 24 تایی رو فرو کرده توی باسنش! .
❤14🤬10👌4
🔴 ویدیوی وایرال شده از سورپرایز تولد علیرضا توسط مامانش. دخترا اگه نصف عشوه علیرضا رو داشتن سر خونه بخت بودن. .
❤25🤣2
🔴 فوری: توی روسیه یه محقق داشته توی "موسسه تحقیقاتی ضد طاعون" آزمایش انجام میداده که به یه ویروس ناشناخته دچار میشه و میمیره! حدود ۲۰۰ نفر که احتمال تماس باهاش رو داشتن قرنطینه کردن، چندین بیمارستان رو تعطیل کردن و حتی آمریکا هم ورود فوری داشته و سعی داره کنترلش کنه. اگه این ویروس به بیرون شیوع پیدا کنه کار تمومه، چون هیچ درمان و واکسنی نداره و ۱۰۰ برابر خطرناک و کشندهتر از کروناس!
❤10
🔴 پشماتون بریزه از تاثیر سهمیه! توی کنکور امسال یه نفر رتبهاش ۸۱ هزار شده بوده، که با سهمیه ۲۵ درصد، رتبهاش ۲۸۳ شده! .
👍20❤8
🔴 مراد ویسی: جنگی که توی راهه، آخرین جنگ ترامپ با جمهوری اسلامی خواهد بود! اما به قدری این جنگ شدید و گستردهاس، که جنگ ۱۲ و ۴۰ روزه، پیشش یه شوخیه! شدت بمبارونها خیلی شدیدتر خواهد بود، کشورای بیشتری درگیر میشن و این نبرد آخره! .
❤30👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,411 posts we hold for @ProxyToli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ProxyToli named 17 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبراعتراضات/پروکسیملی” (@ProxyToli), 240,980 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProxyToli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.