من که دارم میرم یه شهر دیگه چون به موقع نتونستم لاین عوض کنم : @newsbin
🤣66❤6

Channel
@newsbin
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,300,446subscribers
-114,881 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001121051358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @newsbin @ov2ray |
| Description | • پوشش اخبار و اتفاقات جهان بدون وابستگی به هیچ گروه یا ارگانی(منافع ایران خط قرمز ماست) “ تمامی اخبار بدون سانسور “ ———————————— |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newsbin |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @NPROXY/322977 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC | @newsbin/52686 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC | 0.98 | under a minute |
| @NPROXY/322375 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | @newsbin/52626 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | 0.97 | under a minute |
| @NPROXY/322937 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC | @newsbin/52682 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC | 0.96 | under a minute |
| @NPROXY/322626 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC | @newsbin/52651 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC | 0.95 | under a minute |
| @NPROXY/322876 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC | @newsbin/52676 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC | 0.95 | under a minute |
| @NPROXY/322566 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC | @newsbin/52645 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC | 0.95 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @NPROXY | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | under a minute | this entry (7–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 27 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
On 7 of the 840 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0059 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /536045 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC | 23 hours | 13,500 → 16,200at least +2,600 | 40 → 42at most +3 | +15.2 |
| /536326 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC | 40 minutes | 3,600 → 6,160at least +2,550 | 13 → 14at most +2 | +14.9 |
| /536437 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC | 5.2 hours | 11,300 → 13,900at least +2,500 | 63 → 65at most +3 | +14.6 |
| /536447 Sept 2026, 05:50 UTC | 5.2 hours | 11,100 → 13,500at least +2,300 | 46 → 48at most +3 | +13.5 |
| /536497 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC | 5.4 hours | 10,300 → 12,200at least +1,800 | 31 → 32at most +2 | +10.5 |
| /537109 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC | 8.6 hours | 13,200 → 16,300at least +3,000 | 134 → 137at most +4 | +17.6 |
| /5395816 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC | 6.2 hours | 14,900 → 17,700at least +2,700 | 44 → 44at most +1 | +15.8 |
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 1,300,446 | -1,783 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 1,302,229 | -2,752 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 1,304,981 | -1,636 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 1,306,617 | -2,550 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 1,309,167 | -427 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 1,309,594 | -3,050 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 1,312,644 | -979 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 1,313,623 | -3,819 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 1,317,442 | -1,567 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 1,319,009 | -6,313 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 1,325,322 | -1,670 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 1,326,992 | -5,476 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 1,332,468 | -653 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 1,333,121 | -2,755 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:49 | 1,335,876 | -406 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 1,336,282 | -2,212 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:53 | 1,338,494 | -581 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:53 | 1,339,075 | -2,234 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,341,309 | -116 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 1,341,425 | first reading |
1,527 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 820 of 924 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,527 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,132,998 |
| Reactions total | 86,098 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 207 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 840 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 808 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 68.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 14,000 views — 1.08% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 16,800).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /5406119 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC | 37 minutes – 42 minutes old | 2,210 views ~37 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 14 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5406019 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC | 52 minutes – 1.7 hours old | 3,980 views ~56 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,538 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 45 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405919 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC | 629 minutes – 2.7 hours old | 5,580 views ~94 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,363 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 73 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405819 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC | 721 minutes – 3.2 hours old | 6,500 views ~69 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,835 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,212 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 75 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405719 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC | 89 minutes – 3.6 hours old | 6,680 views ~54 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,860 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,890still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 73 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405619 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC | 830 minutes – 3.9 hours old | 7,040 views ~44 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,896 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,894 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 78 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405519 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC | 919 minutes – 4.2 hours old | 7,740 views ~91 reactions | 60 minutes: 3,090 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,320still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 81 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5405219 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC | 929 minutes – 4.4 hours old | 6,530 views ~9 reactions | 60 minutes: 2,940 → 3.0 hours: 5,398 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 69 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
86,098 reactions across 814 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 34,475 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 19,020 | 22.1% | |
| 👍 | 17,210 | 20.0% | |
| 😭 | 3,024 | 3.51% | |
| 🖕 | 2,723 | 3.16% | |
| 👏 | 1,906 | 2.21% | |
| 👎 | 1,569 | 1.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1,538 | 1.79% | |
| 😨 | 1,308 | 1.52% | |
| 😡 | 906 | 1.05% | |
| 💯 | 735 | 0.854% | |
| 🙏 | 438 | 0.509% | |
| 🤝 | 399 | 0.463% | |
| 😇 | 282 | 0.328% | |
| ✍ | 200 | 0.232% | |
| 😘 | 154 | 0.179% | |
| 🤗 | 107 | 0.124% | |
| 🫡 | 104 | 0.121% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 820 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من که دارم میرم یه شهر دیگه چون به موقع نتونستم لاین عوض کنم : @newsbin
🤣66❤6
شهریور، آخرین ماه تابستان، روزهای خود را با زیبایی و خاطره ورق میزندتا به پاییز برسد. لحظه لحظه ی پاییزی تون به زیبایی برگهای پاییزی 🍂🍁🥰🙏 @newsbin
❤25👎1
. بجای تماشای پنجره زندگی دیگران از کتاب عمرت لذت ببر داشته هایت را جلوی چشمانت قاب بگیر و برای نداشته هایت تلاش کن حسرت باغچه دیگران را نخور در عوض باغبان دنیای خودت باش ! رشید کاکاوند . روزتون قشنگ @newsbin
❤20
در گلایه كردن ميلى به آشتی هست و من دیگر از تو گلایه اى ندارم. @newsbin
🤝35❤6
عاشق قطع رابطه با آدمای سمی هستم. عاشق آنفالو كردن آدمای خودشیفه هستم. استفاده از دكمهی بلاک رو در رابطه با آدمای تاکسیک دوست دارم. عاشق رفتنم، عاشق اينم كه به آدماى بد ذات اجازهی دسترسی به خودم رو ندم. @newsbin
👍42❤6👎4💯4
میگن آلمانی ها وقتی واسه اولین بار میرن آمریکا تا یه مدت افسردگی میگرین .... که چی ... که چرا ما عمرمون رو تو آلمان حروم کردیم ... @newsbin
👎28🔥20❤14😭12👍4
هیچ وقت سعی نکنید آدم خوبه ی هیچ داستانی باشید، خودتون باشین و هیچ وقت به کم تر از استاندارداتون راضی نشین. وقتی رعایت حال بقیه رو میکنید از نظر بقیه دم دستی تلقی میشین. چه تو کار، چه تو رابطه، چه فامیل چه دوست. @newsbin
👍40❤5👏4
ترس عجيبی كه من جديداً باهاش مواجه شدم ترس از اميدواريه. مى ترسم به چیزی اميدوار بشم و نشه. اون نشدن انقد تكرار شده كه لذت امیدواری در یک سرى موارد رو هم ازم گرفته. @newsbin
👍67❤11😨3👏2😭1
هرچه شخصیت ناسالم تر باشد انعطاف پذیری آن کمتر است. @newsbin
👍29👎6❤2
قبل ازدواج حتما مدتی مستقل زندگی کنید شاید اون چیزی که می خواستید مستقل بودن باشه نه ازدواج @newsbin
👍121🖕16❤7✍6🔥3👎2💯2
درونِ درونگرا؟ برونگرا؟ منو توی هیچ قالبی نذار؛ جایی که دوستم داشته باشن، میدرخشم؛ جایی که قضاوتم کنن، ساکت میشم؛ و جایی که انرژیمو بگیرن، محو میشم. @newsbin
👍63❤11😭1
دم اسبی گربهای 🥲🩷 @newsbin
❤62😭12🤣6👎1😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,527 posts we hold for @newsbin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 93 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار فوری مملکت | نیوزبین” (@newsbin), 1,300,446 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newsbin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.