Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شهردارچي

Channel

شهردارچي

@Shahrdarchi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,234subscribers

+509 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125713112
TypeChannel
Username@Shahrdarchi
Descriptionخانواده بزرگ شهرداری آی دی جهت ارسال مطالب👇🏾 🆔 @shahrdarc 👈 كانال رسمي پايگاه تحليلي و خبري بهارستان ایران دارای مجوز رسمی از وزارت ارشاد 77161 صفحه اینستاگرام👇 Instagram.com/shahrdarchi بله 👈👈 ble.ir/join/AnSKXseSXm
Created31 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shahrdarchi

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

33,700 average views per post against 42,234 subscribers — an engagement rate of 79.8%. Across the 3,512 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,987 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.17% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.29%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (7 August 2026 6 September 2026)
Posts measured74 of 74 published in the window (0 exact, 74 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,493,800
Mature posts only80.0% over 73 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers42,234 measured 6 September 2026
Cohortb31623:fas · 3,512 channels · p10 0.79% · p25 2.17% · p50 5.29% · p75 11.2% · p90 20.7%
Position in cohort99.630th percentile · 15.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.069% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 6 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

39,45042,44040,9456 August 2026 — 41,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,719 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,528 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,483 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,441 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,405 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,347 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,266 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,219 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,176 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,163 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,153 subscribers22 August 2026 — 41,146 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,450 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,171 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,440 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,434 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,428 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,391 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,357 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,335 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,298 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,274 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,258 subscribers6 September 2026 — 42,234 subscribers42,2346 August 20266 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 31 days, net +509. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,002–42,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 00:5842,234-24
4 Sept 2026, 00:1442,258-16
2 Sept 2026, 11:2342,274-24
1 Sept 2026, 13:0242,298-37
31 Aug 2026, 13:3742,335-22
30 Aug 2026, 12:1442,357-34
29 Aug 2026, 10:5742,391-37
28 Aug 2026, 07:4442,428-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:2642,434-6
26 Aug 2026, 09:3242,440+269
25 Aug 2026, 06:0242,171+2,721
24 Aug 2026, 05:2539,450-1,696
22 Aug 2026, 14:5341,146-7
21 Aug 2026, 04:5441,153-10
20 Aug 2026, 05:2841,163-13
19 Aug 2026, 07:3241,176-43
18 Aug 2026, 09:3841,219-47
17 Aug 2026, 11:5741,266-81
16 Aug 2026, 03:2841,347-58
14 Aug 2026, 14:2641,405first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 42,234 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,700
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held102 (29 July 20265 September 2026)
Views total2,493,800
Reactions total17,986
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,300
Videos
651
Links
8,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 16s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

78,919 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎36,21745.9%
👍30,77539.0%
😡6,5198.26%
👏4,8696.17%
😱4560.578%
😢830.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC≈28,300 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

📣ساعت کاری ادارات تغییر نکرد/ تمدید بخشنامه قبلی تا پایان شهریور ▪️علاءالدین رفیع‌زاده معاون رئیس جمهور رئیس سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور بخشنامه تمدید وضعیت فعلی ساعت کاری ادارات تا پایان تابستان را به دستگاه اجرایی ابلاغ کرد. همکاران شهرداری تهران همچنان مطابق قبل در محل کار حاضر باشند. @shahrdarchi 👈 @shahrvandchy 👈

4 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC≈39,900 viewsread 6 September 2026

#صدای_کارکنان | وقتی مدیریت عاشق «طرح جدید» می‌شود! یکی از مشکلاتی که در مدیریت سازمان‌های بزرگ می‌تواند به وجود بیاید، چیزی است که در ادبیات مدیریتی از آن با عنوان Shiny Object Syndrome یا «سندرم شیء براق» یاد می‌شود؛ یعنی مدیر دائماً جذب ایده، پروژه و برنامه جدید می‌شود و پیش از آنکه برنامه قبلی فرصت پیدا کند به نتیجه برسد، توجه سازمان را به سمت ایده بعدی می‌برد. کنار این مفهوم، Initiative Overload یا «تورم ابتکار

3 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTC≈31,500 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

❓نمایشگاه یا منافع نمایشگاهی؟ شرکت نمایشگاه‌های بین‌المللی می‌گوید مشکل ترافیک شمال تهران «ساختاری» است، نه نتیجه فعالیت نمایشگاه‌ها. قبول؛ اما یک سؤال جدی باقی می‌ماند: اگر شهر آفتاب برای میزبانی نمایشگاه‌های بزرگ و پرمخاطب آماده شده، چرا انتقال کامل آنها همچنان انجام نمی‌شود؟ مسئله فقط ترافیک نیست؛ مسئله، هزینه‌ای است که شهروندان می‌پردازند و منافعی است که باید شفاف شود. 🔻 درآمد نمایشگاه در سئول چقدر است؟ 🔻 هز

2 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC≈39,900 viewsread 6 September 2026

❓احکام جدید کارکنان رسمی شهرداری تهران 📩 یکی از کارکنان پیامی به شرح ذیل برای شهردارچی ارسال کرده است: «طبق شنیده‌ها احکام افزایش پرسنل رسمی آماده شده، اما گویا به دلیل کمبود منابع مالی، پرداخت آن با مشکل مواجه شده است.» #سؤال_روز شهردارچی: ❓آیا واقعاً احکام افزایش حقوق کارکنان رسمی شهرداری تهران آماده شده اما به دلیل کمبود منابع مالی، اجرای آن متوقف یا به تعویق افتاده است؟ و مهم‌تر: ❓ آیا شهرداری تهران در این خ

2 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈37,500 viewsread 6 September 2026

#نظر_شما با سلام چند نکته انتقادی در زمینه دستورالعمل جابجایی پرسنل بالای ۱۰ سال؛ ۱ ) این افراد نیروهای صاحبنظر، منتقد، پرسشگر و البته مطلع در زمینه امور مختلف شغلی هستند. ۲) اینکه در برخی مناطق مازاد نیروی انسانی وجود دارد قابل کتمان نیست اما نکته این جاست که؛ چرا با علم اینکه در مناطقی نیروی مازاد وجود دارد نیروی جدید جذب شده؟ چرا هر شهردار و یا معاونی با انتصاب در منطقه جدید بصورت اتوبوسی نفرات مورد وثوقش رو وارد

2 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC≈38,900 viewsread 6 September 2026

📊 نظرسنجی برای شناخت است، نه صحنه‌آرایی! نظرسنجی اخیر شهردارچی با هدف شناخت دقیق‌تر دیدگاه کارکنان و کمک به بهبود تصمیم‌گیری در سازمان برگزار شد؛ نه برای تأیید یا رد از پیش تعیین‌شده یک موضوع. آنان که در نظرسنجی‌ها با رأی‌سازی یا استفاده از ربات نتیجه را تغییر می‌دهند، در واقع به جای کمک به سازمان، اطلاعات غلط به تصمیم‌گیران می‌دهند. کسانی که نتیجه یک نظرسنجی را عمداً دستکاری می‌کنند، حتی اگر با نیت حمایت از سازما

1 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC≈35,100 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۱۰ ـ اگر اختیار طراحی این طرح با شما بود، کدام گزینه را انتخاب می‌کردید؟

  1. 🔘اجرای طرح فعلی با معیار ۱۰ سال سابقه55%
  2. 🔘اجرای طرح، اما با اصلاح معیارها و ایجاد سازوکار اعتراض1%
  3. 🔘ایجاد یک سامانه داخلی برای اعلام نیاز مناطق و جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه کارکنان13%
  4. 🔘ابتدا نیازسنجی کامل نیروی انسانی مناطق و سپس جابه‌جایی هدفمند6%
  5. 🔘ترکیب جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه، نیازسنجی سازمانی و جابه‌جایی اجباری در موارد ضروری14%
  6. 🔘عدم اجرای طرح12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC≈38,300 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۹ ـ به نظر شما اجرای شتاب‌زده و گسترده این طرح چه پیامدی برای شهرداری خواهد داشت؟

  1. 🟤 افزایش بهره‌وری و استفاده بهتر از نیروی انسانی59%
  2. 🟤 تأثیر مثبت و منفی تقریباً برابر2%
  3. 🟤 کاهش بهره‌وری و اختلال در امور مناطق9%
  4. 🟤 افزایش نارضایتی و کاهش انگیزه30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC≈37,700 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۸- در صورت قرار گرفتن شما در فهرست کارکنان مشمول جابه‌جایی، کدام موارد را برای رعایت حقوق کارکنان ضروری می‌دانید؟ امکان انتخاب چند گزینه وجود دارد.

  1. ⚪️ اعلام کتبی دلیل جابه‌جایی24%
  2. ⚪️ اعلام پست و محل خدمت مقصد32%
  3. ⚪️ تناسب پست مقصد با تخصص و سابقه فرد37%
  4. ⚪️ توجه به محل سکونت76%
  5. ⚪️ توجه به شرایط خانوادگی25%
  6. ⚪️ امکان اعتراض و بررسی مجدد25%
  7. ⚪️ اولویت دادن به جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه40%
  8. ⚪️پیش‌بینی مهلت کافی برای اجرای انتقال8%
  9. ⚪️ سایر موارد ( در کامنت‌ بنویسید)2%

The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTC≈27,300 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۷- آیا معتقدید قبل از اجرای طرح، شهرداری باید نیاز واقعی نیروی انسانی هر یک از مناطق ۲۲گانه را اعلام کند؟

  1. 🔵 بله، حتماً36%
  2. 🔵 بهتر است اعلام شود5%
  3. 🔵 ضرورتی ندارد57%
  4. 🔵 مخالفم1%
  5. 🔵 نظری ندارم2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC≈27,500 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۶- در صورتی که اجرای طرح ضروری باشد، کدام روش را مناسب‌تر می‌دانید؟

  1. 🟠جابه‌جایی اجباری همه کارکنان مشمول ۱۰ سال56%
  2. 🟠جابه‌جایی صرفاً بر اساس نیاز واقعی مناطق6%
  3. 🟠ابتدا فراخوان داوطلبانه و سپس جابه‌جایی افراد مورد نیاز17%
  4. 🟠ترکیبی از جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه و اجباری در موارد ضروری5%
  5. 🟠ادامه وضعیت فعلی و عدم اجرای طرح17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC≈25,500 viewsread 6 September 2026
Poll

سؤال ۵ ـ به نظر شما جابه‌جایی اجباری کارکنان بدون اعلام عمومی معیارها و دلایل انتخاب افراد، تا چه اندازه می‌تواند موجب بی‌اعتمادی کارکنان شود؟

  1. 🟣 بسیار زیاد41%
  2. 🟣 زیاد4%
  3. 🟣 متوسط2%
  4. 🟣 کم1%
  5. 🟣 اصلاً موجب بی‌اعتمادی نمی‌شود51%
  6. 🟣 نظری ندارم2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @Shahrdarchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTCFinal Results3,880 voters approx.

سؤال ۱۰ ـ اگر اختیار طراحی این طرح با شما بود، کدام گزینه را انتخاب می‌کردید؟

  1. 🔘اجرای طرح فعلی با معیار ۱۰ سال سابقه55%
  2. 🔘اجرای طرح، اما با اصلاح معیارها و ایجاد سازوکار اعتراض1%
  3. 🔘ایجاد یک سامانه داخلی برای اعلام نیاز مناطق و جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه کارکنان13%
  4. 🔘ابتدا نیازسنجی کامل نیروی انسانی مناطق و سپس جابه‌جایی هدفمند6%
  5. 🔘ترکیب جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه، نیازسنجی سازمانی و جابه‌جایی اجباری در موارد ضروری14%
  6. 🔘عدم اجرای طرح12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTCFinal Results3,660 voters approx.

سؤال ۹ ـ به نظر شما اجرای شتاب‌زده و گسترده این طرح چه پیامدی برای شهرداری خواهد داشت؟

  1. 🟤 افزایش بهره‌وری و استفاده بهتر از نیروی انسانی59%
  2. 🟤 تأثیر مثبت و منفی تقریباً برابر2%
  3. 🟤 کاهش بهره‌وری و اختلال در امور مناطق9%
  4. 🟤 افزایش نارضایتی و کاهش انگیزه30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTCFinal Results995 voters

سؤال ۸- در صورت قرار گرفتن شما در فهرست کارکنان مشمول جابه‌جایی، کدام موارد را برای رعایت حقوق کارکنان ضروری می‌دانید؟ امکان انتخاب چند گزینه وجود دارد.

  1. ⚪️ اعلام کتبی دلیل جابه‌جایی24%
  2. ⚪️ اعلام پست و محل خدمت مقصد32%
  3. ⚪️ تناسب پست مقصد با تخصص و سابقه فرد37%
  4. ⚪️ توجه به محل سکونت76%
  5. ⚪️ توجه به شرایط خانوادگی25%
  6. ⚪️ امکان اعتراض و بررسی مجدد25%
  7. ⚪️ اولویت دادن به جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه40%
  8. ⚪️پیش‌بینی مهلت کافی برای اجرای انتقال8%
  9. ⚪️ سایر موارد ( در کامنت‌ بنویسید)2%

The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTCFinal Results3,660 voters approx.

سؤال ۷- آیا معتقدید قبل از اجرای طرح، شهرداری باید نیاز واقعی نیروی انسانی هر یک از مناطق ۲۲گانه را اعلام کند؟

  1. 🔵 بله، حتماً36%
  2. 🔵 بهتر است اعلام شود5%
  3. 🔵 ضرورتی ندارد57%
  4. 🔵 مخالفم1%
  5. 🔵 نظری ندارم2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTCFinal Results3,940 voters approx.

سؤال ۶- در صورتی که اجرای طرح ضروری باشد، کدام روش را مناسب‌تر می‌دانید؟

  1. 🟠جابه‌جایی اجباری همه کارکنان مشمول ۱۰ سال56%
  2. 🟠جابه‌جایی صرفاً بر اساس نیاز واقعی مناطق6%
  3. 🟠ابتدا فراخوان داوطلبانه و سپس جابه‌جایی افراد مورد نیاز17%
  4. 🟠ترکیبی از جابه‌جایی داوطلبانه و اجباری در موارد ضروری5%
  5. 🟠ادامه وضعیت فعلی و عدم اجرای طرح17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTCFinal Results4,100 voters approx.

سؤال ۵ ـ به نظر شما جابه‌جایی اجباری کارکنان بدون اعلام عمومی معیارها و دلایل انتخاب افراد، تا چه اندازه می‌تواند موجب بی‌اعتمادی کارکنان شود؟

  1. 🟣 بسیار زیاد41%
  2. 🟣 زیاد4%
  3. 🟣 متوسط2%
  4. 🟣 کم1%
  5. 🟣 اصلاً موجب بی‌اعتمادی نمی‌شود51%
  6. 🟣 نظری ندارم2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

تهران‌‌نامه
@TEHRANNAMEH · 9,964
#1
باشگاه رفاهی شهرداری تهران
@REFAHTehranMunicipality · 13,984
#2
شهرما
@Shahremaa · 5,560
#3
شرکت خدمات اداری شهر
@khadamaatedarishahr · 2,317
#4
شوراآنلاین
@shoraonline · 6,230
#5
موسسه هادیان شهر تهران
@hadianshahrtehran · 1,718
#6
از بهشت (معاونت‌برنامه‌ریزی،توسعه‌سرمایه‌انسانی و امور شورا
@HRD_news · 4,073
#7
گمنام شهر
@gomnaam_shahr · 4,021
#8
خبرهای فوری مهم 🔖
@khabar_fouri · 1,212,719
#9
شهریار تعاونی تولیدی توزیعی کارکنان شهرداری تهران
@taavoni_shahryar · 2,320
#10
اخبار شورا
@akhbare_shora · 6,740
#11
گذر پنجم
@gozarepanjom · 2,743
#12
شهروندچی
@shahrvandchy · 5,379
#13
خبرگزاری شهر
@Shahragency · 21,134
#14
واحد آنلاین
@vahedonline · 1,319
#15
خبرفوری
@khabarfouri · 5,055,659
#16
شــَـهرْ-یـٰار (تعاونی کارکنان‌شهرداری ‌تهران)
@sharyar_ir · 2,968
#17
سيماي مديريت شهري
@simamodiriatshahri · 1,720
#18
اتحادیه راهبران مترو تهران
@Etehad_Metro · 4,157
#19
شهر سالم تهران
@shahresalem · 2,971
#20
برنامه ریزی و سرمایه انسانی منطقه ۱۵
@hrd15 · 567
#21
کارکنان شهرسالم
@personnel · 438
#22
اخبار کارکنان و مدیران شهرداری تهران
@shahrdaritehran_ir · 3,971
#23
اخبار بازنشستگان شهرداری تهران
@bazneshastegi · 5,200
#24
تهران جدید
@tehran_jadid · 2,738
#25
پایش تهران
@payeshTehran · 676
#26
شهردار شمایی
@shahrdarshomaei · 609
#27
مترونویس
@metro_tusroc · 4,081
#28
اخبار تهران
@akhbartehran · 937,185
#29
((آزاداندیشان کارگر ))
@azadandeshkar · 1,079
#30
کانال کارکنان شهرداریهای کشور
@hamkaran_shahrdariha · 10,853
#31
باشگاه روزنامه‌نگاران ایران
@JournalistsClub1 · 9,371
#32
فناورانه | رسانه فناوری سازمان فاوا
@tmicto · 519
#33
خانه کارگر
@khanehkargar · 55,389
#34
شهردارآنلاین
@shahrdaronline · 3,699
#35
تهران زیبا
@tehraneziba_ir · 1,706
#36
فرهنگی مترو
@metro_farhangi · 557
#37
ری؛ قبله تهران
@ghebleyetehran · 484
#38
تهران چهار
@tehranregion4 · 539
#39
تعاونی مسکن، سرمایه تو و من
@tavonivarzrsh · 271
#40
تهران شهر
@tehshahrr · 1,415
#41
اخبارمناطق و نواحی
@akhbareshahry · 545
#42
شهردار فوری
@shahrdarfori · 551
#43
پایگاه خبری تحلیلی دسترنج نیوز
@dastranjnews_ir · 6,376
#44
افق تهران
@ofoghtehran_ir · 8,330
#45
اتوپیا " آرمانشهر "
@utopia_online · 2,169
#46
جنت نیوز ( شهرداری تهران)
@janatnews_ir · 1,690
#47
لینک رسانه‌های اصلاح‌طلب
@linkresaneha · 821
#48
پایگاه خبری تحلیلی بهشت آنلاین
@behesht_online · 7,106
#49
آخرین خبر
@akharinkhabar · 2,007,974
#50
خبرفوری
@akhbarefori · 4,439,277
#51
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 774,157
#52
جهاد تبیین
@jahadtabiyn · 2,591
#53
خبرگزاری فارس
@farsna · 1,800,876
#54
سهام نیوز
@sahamnewsorg · 217,394
#55
سازمان ورزش شهرداری تهران
@sazmane_varzesh · 2,542
#56
رسانه تصویری آن
@onnewsmedia · 15,880
#57
عصر ایران
@MyAsriran · 118,143
#58
اصلاحات نیوز - رسانه
@Eslahatnews · 138,851
#59
کانال خبری بامدادنو
@baamdadeno · 106,647
#60
مترو تهران و حومه
@metro_t1377 · 3,173
#61
شمیران ‌۲۴
@tehranmunicipality01 · 965
#62
نیستان
@neyestan_nava · 254 (as read 29 August 2026)
#63
سوتی کانالها
@sootikanalha · 877
#64
چندثانیه آنلاین
@chandsanieh_news · 139,450
#65
سندیکای کارگران شرکت واحد اتوبوسرانی تهران و حومه
@vahedsyndica · 3,539
#66
کارمند نیوز
@karmandnews_ir · 9,489
#67
DONOT combo|کومبو دونات
@Notpixel_livestream · 31
#68
میان تیتر
@miyantitr · 7,177
#69
💠مرکز آموزش علمی کاربردی فرهنگ و هنر واحد ۱۰ تهران 💠
@uast10ir · 2,302
#70
کیهان آنلاین
@kayhan_online · 6,388
#71
گروه‌مطالعاتی‌هشت
@MohammadAghasi8 · 343
#72
شهرداری منطقه ۶ تهران
@mantagheh_6 · 527
#73
پایگاه خبری الف
@alef_news · 38,320
#74
انتصابات چهاردهم
@entesabat14 · 703
#75
مجال | یاسر جلالی
@majaal · 685
#76
پشت پرده
@poshteparde313 · 35,674
#77
كميل خجسته
@kkhojasteh · 1,015
#78
"مَرنٔجُ مَرنٔجٰانٔ"
@zeinaaabam · 134
#79
تریبون مجلس
@tribunemajles · 12,135
#80
محسن پیرهادی
@pirhadi_ir · 616
#81
مرجع مطالعات شهری
@RegionalPlanning · 8,518
#82
صندوق تعاون بهره برداری
@MetroST · 684
#83
کانال کوروش-فقط ایردراپ های معتبر
@kourosh · 166
#84
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,234,437
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خانه کارگر
@khanehkargar · 55,389
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شهردارچي” (@Shahrdarchi), 42,234 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shahrdarchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.