🐋Здесь будет разные способы заработка и про крипта и т.д🐳
По всем вопросам: @Cryptopp_russ
Рекламный менеджер: @killhpx @ebonnoir @AsMitik52 @tonmoneybag @Arch1k3 @Nos0k_TON @Promo_Hub_admin @kassurp @TonySWork @C0NFES5 @qzxsc13 @Sa4iz(без оплаты)
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @xRocketAnon. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far below this size band
74.0 average views per post against 36,729 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.202%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 15 published in the window (15 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,110
Mature posts only
0.213% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
61 measurements spanning 90 days, net -4,869. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,975–42,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 23:46
36,705
-24
4 Nov 2026, 23:11
36,729
-67
3 Nov 2026, 21:28
36,796
-85
2 Nov 2026, 19:49
36,881
-45
1 Nov 2026, 18:58
36,926
-36
31 Oct 2026, 20:48
36,962
-25
31 Oct 2026, 00:05
36,987
-48
29 Oct 2026, 23:40
37,035
-20
29 Oct 2026, 00:10
37,055
-44
28 Oct 2026, 02:00
37,099
-54
27 Oct 2026, 01:59
37,153
-32
25 Oct 2026, 23:16
37,185
-36
24 Oct 2026, 22:00
37,221
-46
23 Oct 2026, 23:20
37,267
-44
22 Oct 2026, 20:08
37,311
-47
21 Oct 2026, 13:46
37,358
-48
20 Oct 2026, 11:36
37,406
-41
19 Oct 2026, 10:07
37,447
-53
18 Oct 2026, 11:09
37,500
-42
17 Oct 2026, 12:06
37,542
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.208%
avg views ÷ 36,705 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.4
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
65 (3 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
1,146
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
666
Videos
37
Links
544
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
322 reactions across 64 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
81
25.2%
❤
78
24.2%
🔥
61
18.9%
🆒
49
15.2%
🎃
29
9.01%
👾
9
2.80%
🍓
6
1.86%
❤🔥
5
1.55%
👍
3
0.932%
🎉
1
0.311%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ваша «PLATINA» уже оплачена 🎁
Если у вас «Карта для онлайн-сервисов» или «Карта для путешествий», то «Платину» со всеми её преимуществами мы предоставим вам бесплатно.
❤️ Как получить:
Закройте свои старые карты, и «Платина» сама появится в приложении. Остаток со старых карт вернётся на баланс Antarctic Wallet, а первое пополнение «Платины» будет бесплатным!
«Карту для всего» закрывать не нужно.
Остается только пе…
Знакомьтесь, «PLATINA» ❤️
Нет, это не опечатка. $0 за каждую оплату. 1,7% за пополнение. До $200 000 в сутки на покупки.
«Платина» – новая премиальная карта Antarctic Wallet. Та самая, что пряталась подо льдом.
❤️А ещё с «Платиной»:
➖ до $15 000 за одну операцию;
➖ Apple Pay и Google Pay по всему миру;
➖ оплата любых зарубежных сервисов: ChatGPT, Netflix, Duolingo;
➖ пополнение без лимита на сумму.
Выпускайте прем…
Antarctic Wallet в Кыргызстане 🇰🇬
USDT из кошелька отныне можно вывести в сомах на любую карту кыргызского банка. Перевод проходит через кошелёк: без P2P, поиска контрагентов и риска нарваться на «треугольник».
🔴 Как вывести:
«Сервисы» → «Вывести на карту» → «Карта» → выберите Кыргызстан, укажите реквизиты и сумму.
Выводите в пару кликов ➡️ ссылка на кошелек
Нужен стабильный способ пополнения по СБП?
В Antarctic Wallet сервис доступен круглосуточно, а месячный лимит для пользователей Antarctic VIP достигает 4 000 000 ₽.
Откройте Antarctic Wallet и пополните счёт уже сейчас 🐧
❤️Ссылка на ANTARCTIC
Напоминаю: последний шанс выпустить международную карту за 10$ в Antarctic Wallet ⚡️
Сегодня в 19:00 стоимость выпуска карты для всего будет 10$. До этого времени карту ещё можно оформить по этой же цене и сэкономить...
Да, вам не показалась, ценник не изменился 😁
Пока другие сервисы повышают свои прайсы в 3 - 5 раз, Antarctic Wallet сам себе не изменяет - лучшие карты на рынке всего за 10 баксов!
Если откладывали…
Твой контент может приносить USDT 😱
Ищем новых амбассадоров Antarctic Wallet. Рассказывай о кошельке своей аудитории так, как нравится тебе. Получай за это выплаты в USDT каждые 2 недели.
➖ Программа РФ для блогеров
➖ Программа видео-мейкеров
Хочешь присоединиться? Оставляй заявку по ссылке
Знаешь блогеров, которым это подойдёт? Приводи их по программе «Приведи амбассадора». Приведённый блогер закрепляется за тобо…
Следующий токен выбираете вы ❤️
Только за прошлый месяц мы добавили сети Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, Arbitrum и Base. А из токенов уже доступны TRX, BNB, ETH, AVAX, POL и KAIA. Останавливаться мы не планируем!
Следующие сети и токены хотим выбрать вместе с вами. Напишите в комментариях, чего ждете именно вы ❤️
Ссылка на ANTARCTIC
Первые мини-аппы уже в Antarctic Wallet ❤️
Сервисы открываются прямо в кошельке, без отдельных приложений и регистрации.
❤️Собрали те, что уже работают:
➖ Kitron Energy – аренда энергии для дешёвых переводов USDT;
➖ Kitron eSim– travel-eSIM в два клика;
➖ Wizard– звёзды, Telegram Premium, пополнение игр и сервисов, а также аренда подарков в одном месте;
➖ Number Rent – номер в аренду для SMS и кодов подтверждения;
…
Первые мини-аппы уже в Antarctic Wallet ❤️
Сервисы открываются прямо в кошельке, без отдельных приложений и регистрации.
❤️Собрали те, что уже работают:
➖ Kitron Energy – аренда энергии для дешёвых переводов USDT;
➖ Kitron eSim– travel-eSIM в два клика;
➖ Wizard– звёзды, Telegram Premium, пополнение игр и сервисов, а также аренда подарков в одном месте;
➖ Number Rent – номер в аренду для SMS и кодов подтверждения;
…
Подборка покупок №18 ❤
Этот выпуск посвящен «Карте для онлайн-сервисов». Благодаря ей наша аудитория оплачивает онлайн-сервисы, зарубежные подписки, и даже платит касанием телефона за границей!
Мы собрали ТОП-5 популярных сервисов, которые вы оплачиваете нашей картой.
❤ Попадите и вы в нашу следующую подборку:
➖ Отправьте в комментарии скриншот вашей покупки (раздел «История»).
➖ Укажите хэштег #моя_покупка. Не з…
FAQ по мини-приложениям Antarctic Wallet ❤️
Собрали ответы на основные вопросы о запуске, возможностях и платежах в мини-приложениях.
❤ Разбираемся по порядку:
➖ Что такое мини-приложение?
Это веб-сервис, который открывается прямо внутри Antarctic Wallet. Пользователю не нужно переходить на другой сайт, регистрироваться или вводить новый пароль.
➖ Какие сервисы можно запустить?
Например, магазин, сервис бронирован…
Инструменты фрилансера в 2026 году ❤️
Многие зарубежные сервисы давно стали необходимым инструментом в работе фрилансера. Проблема одна – российской картой их не оплатить. Собрали подборку, которая реально помогает закрыть задачи от организации проектов до общения с клиентами.
❤️ Фрилансеры, это для вас:
➖ Notion Plus – $10/мес.
Проекты, задачи, база клиентов и рабочие документы в одном месте. Заменяет сразу нескол…
🐳2❤1🎃1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @Solana_AirDropes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @Solana_AirDropes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
24 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Янукович в крипте @YanucovihInCrypto · 36,275 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
DARKWING DUCK @bunnnycrypto · 31,397 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
Insider Alpha Hunter @AlphaHuntIns · 85,760 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎SOLANA Memecoin💎” (@Solana_AirDropes), 36,705 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Solana_AirDropes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.