https://www.dinonline.com/46340/%d8%b2%d9%85%d8%b2%d9

Channel
سروش دباغ
@Soroushdabbagh_Official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,941subscribers
+82 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001054157233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Soroushdabbagh_Official |
| Created | 28 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Soroushdabbagh_Official |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 11,941 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 11,937 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 11,931 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 11,927 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 11,930 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 11,939 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 11,937 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 11,939 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:44 | 11,940 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 11,938 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 11,942 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 11,949 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 11,954 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 11,950 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 11,956 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 11,967 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 11,973 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 11,974 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 11,975 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 11,968 | first reading |
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.3%
- avg views ÷ 11,941 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,590
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (23 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 34,987 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 22s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
به پیشنهاد ایشان، کتاب «تاریخ خداباوری» را با لذت خواندم و بهره بردم. روزگاری که مشغول ترجمۀ تراکتاتوسِ ویتگنشتاین و نوشتنِ شرحی بر آن بودم، دربارۀ برخی معادل هایی که انتخاب میکردم، با جناب سالکی رایزنی می کردم و از ملاحظات ایشان بهره می بردم. خاطرم هست پس از انتخابات ریاست جمهوری سال هشتاد و هشت و غوغاهایی که برانگیخته شده بود، روزی از سر عنایت و محبت به من میگفت: فلانی میدانی چقدر برای شخصیت علمی و فرهنگی شما و …
. « این قافلۀ عمر عجب می گذرد». بیست سال پیش، پس از اتمام درس و مشق فلسفی در دانشگاه واریکِ انگلستان، به تهران بازگشتم و در کسوت عضو هیئت علمی و استادیار، در «موسسه پژوهشیِ حکمت و فلسفه» مشغول به تدریس و تحقیق شدم. در آن دورۀ پنج ساله، اتاق کار من، نزدیک اتاق دکتر بهزاد سالکی بود. به همین سبب، به طور متوسط هفته ای دو بار همدیگرا را می دیدیم؛ یا ایشان به اتاق من می آمدند، یا من به اتاق ایشان می رفتم و با هم چای می …
شرم روانشناختی و شرم اگزیستانسیال با حضور: سروش دباغ Sep 06, 2:00 PM EST شنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۶/۱۴، ساعت ۲۱:۳۰ به وقت تهران کلاب حلقه دیدگاه نو
«خودکاوی فلسفی | روانشناسی اگزیستانسیال» 🌏کارگاه کاملاً آنلاین است و از هرجای دنیا میتوانید شرکت کنید. 🔗مشاهده جزئیات و ثبتنام: https://honarestan.org/courses/129 پلتفرم آموزشی هنرستان وبسایت | یوتیوب | اینستاگرام |
▶️ فایل صوتی #مژده_کتاب ، نشست ۶۴ #حسین_کاجی: گفتوگوی استاد #مصطفی_ملکیان و دکتر #نیما_قربانی با عنوان «ایران و دیگری» #حسین_کمالی: مقاله «آیا فرودست سخن تواند گفت؟» اثر گایاتری چاراوارتی اسپیوک #سروش_دباغ: کتاب «قلندر و قلعه» اثر یحیی یثربی و با معرفی کتاب «محافظه کاری در برابر نومارکسیسم» اثر نظام بهرامی کمیل و کتاب «#ذهن_درستکار» اثر #جانان_هایت ۲۹ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ ۷ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ #حلقه_دیدگاه_نو @didg…
. هفتهٔ پیش، برای یافتن پاسخ به پرسش سایت وزین " صدانت"، دربارهٔ اسامی متفکران و اندیشه وران ایرانی و غیر ایرانی ای که طی چند دههٔ گذشته (اعم از فیلسوف، روان پژوه، شاعر، رمان نویس...)، در شکل گیری و قوام یافتن کار و بار فکری و نوشتاری ام نقش داشته و از ایشان تاثیرات محسوس و ملموسی پذیرفته ام؛ به کنجی خزیدم. سوار بر بال خاطرات شدم و قلعه هزار توی حافظه، خوانده ها، نوسته ها و تجربهٔ زیستهٔ سی و پنج سال گذشته را ب…
. " اوقات خوش آن بود که با دوست بسر شد". این روزها در سفر اروپا هستم. دیروز، مجالی دست داد و در یکی از کافی شاپ های ایرانی شهر لندن که بوی حافظ و شهر شیراز از آن به مشام می رسد، با محمد رهبر نشستیم و چند ساعتی با هم گفتگو کردیم. دیدار مغتنمی بود؛ از سیاست و ادبیات و شعر و خواندن و نوشتن.... گفتیم و شنیدیم. محمد عزیز، در روزهای ابتدایی جنگ چهل روزه، جسارت و حریت تحسین بر انگیزی از خود به خرج داد و از رسانهٔ "ایران …
https://3danet.net/thinker/Soroush-Dabbagh
https://youtube.com/shorts/Gc9oHkVKpb0?feature=share
https://youtu.be/mPiADIQOgQM
Voice message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @Soroushdabbagh_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Soroushdabbagh_Official edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@theopensociety · 1,3175 postsحسین پورفرج | مدادِ مردمکِ دیده
@HosseinPourfaraj · 4783 postsشهر آشنایی - ناصر آملی
@NaserAmoli · 8571 postarch_moosavi
@arch_moosavi · 721 postبنياد توحيد Bonyad Towhid
@bonyadtowhid · 1,0561 postخیام خوانی به وقت زندگی )این کانال محوریت آن کتاب "مشکل ما "ست: بازخوانی مدرن و اگزیستانسیالیستی رباعیات خیام فرامرزمعتمددزفولی:
@khayamkhani · 8591 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@theopensociety · 1,3176 postsمرکز علم و الهیات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
@The_Science_and_Theology_Center · 1,0414 postsهنرستان
@honarestanorg · 1,6884 postsآکادمی بیدل دهلوی | مهرداد مهرجو
@Biddle_Academy · 8561 postحلقه دیدگاه نو
@Didgahenochannel · 10,0001 postمشاوره
@amirrezakamelabbasi · 331 postDinOnline دینآنلاین
@dinonline · 7,9341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@theopensociety · 1,3176 postsمرکز علم و الهیات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
@The_Science_and_Theology_Center · 1,0414 postsآکادمی بیدل دهلوی | مهرداد مهرجو
@Biddle_Academy · 8561 postحلقه دیدگاه نو
@Didgahenochannel · 10,0001 postDinOnline دینآنلاین
@dinonline · 7,9341 post📡خبرستان [دیلی تلگرام] 📡
@khabarestan_ir · 2,9321 postسخنرانیها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,7551 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@book_noor · 43,913
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@mostafamalekian · 65,709
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@drsargolzaei · 35,895
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@anbar100 · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,454
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سروش دباغ” (@Soroushdabbagh_Official), 11,941 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soroushdabbagh_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.