يوم الأربعاء : ٢٧ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ

Channel
نصائح في التربية
@Thamar18
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,337subscribers
-432 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001099388898 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Thamar18 |
| Description | الأبناء قرة عين الإنسان في حياته ، وبهجة في عمره ، وأنسه في عيشه ؛ بهم تحلو الحياة ، وعليهم تعلق الآمال. من أجلهم أنشأنا هذه القناه ؛ لِتكون بيوتَنا سعيدة بهم. القناة خاصة في تربية الابناء. 👇هنا الملتقى👇 @thamar11 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2016 and 31 October 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Thamar18 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 55,337 | -51 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 55,388 | -32 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 55,420 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 55,433 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 55,444 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 55,468 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 55,472 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 55,481 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 55,501 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 55,510 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 55,516 | -33 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 55,549 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 55,562 | -28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 55,590 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 55,591 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 55,601 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 55,613 | -30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 55,643 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 55,645 | -24 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 55,669 | first reading |
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.54%
- avg views ÷ 55,337 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 852
- 70 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 70
- of 97 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 97 (27 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 59,670 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,910
- Videos
- ≈1,810
- Links
- ≈57
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 24s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
يوم الأربعاء : ٢٧ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
من الطرق لتقوية شخصية طفل • إعطائه تعليمات واضحة لعمل معين • الانتباه لإيجابياته وإبرازها • تدريبه على تصرفات في مواجهة موقف • تشجيعه لمحاسبة الكاشير • قيادة أطفال في لعب • أخذه لشراء حاجات البيت • تشجيعه على الكلام بصوت عالي
الماء ونقص الحديد 💦 • أثبتت الدراسات مؤخرًا انخفاض نسب معدلات الحديد لدى الأطفال، فيجب على الطفل أخذ احتياجه اليومي من عنصر الحديد وهو ١٠ ملغرامات في اليوم والواحد. • عودي الطفل شرب الماء؛ فهو يحتاج إلى تناول لتر ونصف اللتر تقريبًا في اليوم والواحد؛ حتى تتم عمليات الهضم لديه بشكل صحيح.
يوم السبت : ٢٣ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
يوم السبت : ٢٣ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
يوم الجمعة : ٢٢ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
يوم الخميس : ٢١ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
يوم الخميس : ٢١ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
شجعوا أولادكم على البر.. أحيانا يقوم أحد الأبناء بعمل جميل للأب أوالأم،فاشكروا له هذا الموقف،واثنوا عليه به،فإنما قام به حبا،أوشعورا بالتقصير تجاهكم.. احذروا كل الحذر من التهكم بالموقف،وأن وراءه أمر ما،فتفقد المبادرة لذتها،وسعادتها.. رحم الله أبا وأما،احتفوا ببر أولادهم لهم..
يوم الأربعاء : ٢٠ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
يوم الأربعاء : ٢٠ رَبِيعٌ الأَوَّلُ ١٤٤٨هـ
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @Thamar18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ما المشكلة التربوية الأبرز التي تعاني منها مع طفلك - حدد أكبر مشكلة فقط
- الكذب13%
- ضعف الرغبة في التعلم18%
- النشاط الحركي الزائد15%
- الشجار بين الأبناء20%
- الشعور بالدونية2%
- العدوانية2%
- العناد19%
- الأنانية0%
- الخجل5%
- التبول اللاإرادي6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@thamar58500 · 96,943#1
@ALTAALIBI · 1,447#2
@dr_holybi · 12,738#3
@hareth_Al_shamri6 · 11,151#4
@Ali_Hawwa · 27,086#5
@https3E · 11,504#6
@aboali1406 · 3,531#7
@thamar12 · 13,238#8
@alnafs2 · 47,151#9
@t_hssan · 34,834#10
@elghunaiman · 4,155#11
@Gawher_and_Dorr · 13,819#12
@ZiadAlaelathar00000 · 592#13
@thamar585000 · 5,214#14
@Ibn_Jebreen · 964#15
@thamar8 · 10,745#16
@hareth_Al_shamri9 · 7,792#17
@Dalailcentre · 16,870#18
@saadalkhthlan · 35,734#19
@Dorrr_6 · 14,708#20
@tarbiya_ma3_asmaa · 7,068#21
@Quraan_2018 · 14,854#22
@Abdalhhamad3 · 4,100#23
@thamar585 · 14,582#24
@linakhaldcouch · 4,135#25
@Aljazi_Alrashed · 6,668#26
@YaRbby · 6,626#27
@QURANICAUDIO1 · 6,867#28
@mrafa_allfakr · 40,629#29
@qamarher · 6,579#30
@Seera_Mohammad · 6,952#31
@FOREVVER1 · 44,863#32
@albahli4040 · 4,287#33
@almonajed · 5,250#34
@hearts2021 · 42,712#35
@jawalk1 · 2,790#36
@dros3lmommohamed · 2,410#37
@BABATFAwI · 27,324#38
@jeel_muslim · 22,639#39
@Laila_2030 · 733#40
@aitaqWem · 94,242#41
@Hadeeth_page4 · 22,245#42
@dr_hassouneh · 3,881#43
@e3lan1 · 744#44
@osraitijannati · 2,188#45
@muqatie30 · 13,864#46
@jamallak · 3,317#47
@Tm5850 · 10,408#48
@aaii5599 · 53,921#49
@vv5vvv · 28,444#50
@formykids · 31,680#51
@kibaar_al_ulama · 22,594#52
@Hhoonizan · 654#53
@ggjjx · 1,467#54
@godmorny · 16,264#55
@indaam · 1,049 (as read 23 August 2026)#56
@dddddawwa · 990 (as read 23 August 2026)#57
@FamilyEducationalAndConsulting · 1,381#58
@Askim_love98 · 1,276#59
@hareth_Al_shamri7 · 13,867#60
@adcar_d_n · 1,672#61
@allah2017allah · 3,134#62
@Falatakhdaan · 1,498#63
@alrayiys2030_1 · 8,121#64
@kibar_aleulama · 2,272#65
@Tanmeyah_Mujtamaeyah · 8,867#66
@MuslimParents · 2,996#67
@Alsunnah1446 · 355#68
@binbaz1420 · 32,634#69
@for_children12 · 2,287#70
@hareth_Al_shamri10 · 7,122#71
@tvquran · 27,190#72
@Alsakrandrr · 33,045#73
@ahmad_abdelmon3em · 145,119#74
@alseera_alnabaweyah · 2,131#75
@mi_llly · 1,388#76
@thamar5850 · 64,542#77
@hashem739 · 1,716#78
@ahlsunnahwaljama · 1,811#79
@ekhlakelmeslim · 2,287#80
@Dobifikh · 905#81
@bin_suaidan · 6,342#82
@AyaHafez15 · 1,001#83
@Academy_02 · 325#84
@Suzanalawadiy · 1,153#85
@manalalaIem · 10,392#86
@Asalafea121 · 1,422#87
@coach_salman · 349#88
@direct_alsawat · 495#89
@nour_al3elm · 4,767#90
@reflektimekuranore · 867#91
@alhasalah · 4,228#92
@brga_7 · 3,814#93
@qurankarem13 · 1,809 (as read 23 August 2026)#94
@alsawat · 712 (as read 23 August 2026)#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thamar58500 · 96,943
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@alnafs2 · 47,151
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@mrafa_allfakr · 40,629
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
@FOREVVER1 · 44,863
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@yyyyyjyiyiy · 62,347
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026
@aaii5599 · 53,921
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
@formykids · 31,680
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@hearts2021 · 42,712
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
@English_201 · 75,361
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
@bawh_alruwh · 58,806
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
@QTAReads · 38,240
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@vv5vvv · 28,444
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
@thamar5850 · 64,542
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نصائح في التربية” (@Thamar18), 55,337 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Thamar18.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.