Achievement Unlocked: x7! ⚡️ @Trade_with_Unique_alpha made a x7+ call on predict FWA. $16K ➡️ $114K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Auto-buy and sell calls like this through SpyDefi Filters!

Channel
Trade with Unique's alpha 🖨
@Trade_with_Unique_alpha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,113subscribers
+876 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001873023137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Trade_with_Unique_alpha |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Trade_with_Unique_alpha |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 7,113 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 7,130 | +9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 7,121 | -360 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 7,481 | -157 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,638 | -124 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 7,762 | -575 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 8,337 | +2,100 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 6,237 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 6,238 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 6,235 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 6,239 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 6,238 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 6,237 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 6,237 | first reading |
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.00%
- avg views ÷ 7,113 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 427
- 68 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.30%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 69
- of 154 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 154 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,012 |
| Reactions total | 395 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
783 reactions across 82 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 137 | 17.5% | |
| ✍ | 122 | 15.6% | |
| ❤ | 113 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 75 | 9.58% | |
| 🤝 | 56 | 7.15% | |
| 🫡 | 43 | 5.49% | |
| 💯 | 42 | 5.36% | |
| 🐳 | 28 | 3.58% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 3.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 3.07% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 2.68% | |
| 🍾 | 20 | 2.55% | |
| 🕊 | 16 | 2.04% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 1.40% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 1.02% | |
| 👨💻 | 8 | 1.02% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.894% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.639% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.639% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 0.639% | |
| 4 further kinds | 10 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
It is on main eth Not RH I believe this can do alot numbers cos cto ongoing rn!
❤🔥2
http://t.me/thewhitebull_vitalik Tg for those asking!
🐳2
$Ansem is close Image $Vitalik frenz👀
0xf2da4643B573042ce685BAa36a855A8812e5CF31
Should we try some eth plays? Been seeing some amazing narra play on main eth! You know all our eth calls are hitting so hard so let try this!
🐳3🫡2❤1
Fully locked in frens today Scanning imo!
⚡33👨💻5❤3
Bond et! , let the pamp begin!
🔥1
This getting eyes rn! Can easily send hard imo👀
🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 $592 VEGA FINANCE BUY! ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ➡️ ETH: 0.24 ($592) ⬅️ VEGA: 17M 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: NEW 📈 Marketcap: $33K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
It seem undervalued atm , i picked up the best entry level before prime time Easy run from here , you know how our plays on RH has been lately!
VEGA ($VEGA) is an AI-powered investment intelligence platform built on Robinhood Chain. Instead of starting with a ticker, you give VEGA an investment thesis or idea in plain English. VEGA then: 🧠 Turns the idea into an investment thesis. 📊 Finds related sectors, industries and assets. 💼 Builds a diversified portfolio across tokenized stocks, ETFs, crypto, commodities, RWAs and Treasuries. 🔄 Continuously monitors th…
🔥5👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @Trade_with_Unique_alpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@spydefi · 42,6108 postsPrometheus
@Prometheus_eth · 2087 postsCrest Trending | Robinhood
@CrestTrending · 2,1686 posts@ETHTRENDING (LIVE)
@ETHTRENDING · 43,8365 postsHEMULE
@Hemule_channel · 484 postsPhanes
@Phanes_bot · 70,6802 postsAffekt Finance
@affektfinance · 571 postETH Price
@eth_price · 16,0231 postJobless Coin
@joblesscoin_bsc · 381 postMarket Insider
@MarketInsiderIG · 11,6021 postRick
@rick · 77,5321 postSteak Trending
@SteakTrending · 71 postVitalik CTO
@thewhitebull_vitalik · 181 post@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 477,9181 postVega Finance - Portal
@vegafinanceportal · 911 postWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,7151 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trade with Unique's alpha 🖨” (@Trade_with_Unique_alpha), 7,113 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trade_with_Unique_alpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.