Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
18 measurements spanning 17 days, net -26,693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,092,527–1,127,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 13:53
1,096,531
-1,771
21 Aug 2026, 07:54
1,098,302
-1,651
20 Aug 2026, 06:46
1,099,953
-1,622
19 Aug 2026, 06:45
1,101,575
-1,394
18 Aug 2026, 08:33
1,102,969
-2,027
17 Aug 2026, 11:27
1,104,996
-2,412
16 Aug 2026, 01:47
1,107,408
-2,619
14 Aug 2026, 11:35
1,110,027
-2,046
13 Aug 2026, 02:34
1,112,073
-1,547
12 Aug 2026, 03:03
1,113,620
-1,512
11 Aug 2026, 03:14
1,115,132
-1,802
10 Aug 2026, 05:11
1,116,934
-1,483
9 Aug 2026, 07:53
1,118,417
-1,648
8 Aug 2026, 06:01
1,120,065
-1,213
7 Aug 2026, 07:08
1,121,278
-1,797
6 Aug 2026, 07:01
1,123,075
-149
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
1,123,224
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:00
1,123,224
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.435%
avg views ÷ 1,096,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,770
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
22 (23 June 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
19,090
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
3 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
1,056 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
317
30.0%
😁
312
29.5%
🔥
141
13.4%
👍
98
9.28%
🤔
87
8.24%
👏
40
3.79%
🎉
23
2.18%
⚡
19
1.80%
🥰
17
1.61%
🤩
2
0.189%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,056reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
UXUY Trading Carnival: Share a 500,000 USD Prize Pool in 14 Days
The crypto market is heating up again, liquidity is waking up, and momentum is returning. To celebrate this turning point, UXUY is launching the Trading Carnival.
📅 Campaign Period:
August 22, 2026, 14:00 UTC - September 5, 2026, 14:00 UTC
🏆 Prize Pool:
During the campaign, users with cumulative valid trading volume across spot and futures of at least…
🎉 UXUY’s first AI Agent internal training session was successfully held in Hong Kong.
📈 Against the stunning backdrop of Victoria Harbour, we had in-depth discussions on how AI is reshaping the on-chain ecosystem, the evolving role of Agents, and the broader possibilities ahead.
🤝 A heartfelt thanks to everyone for your continued support and trust in UXUY. We are evolving rapidly and look forward to exploring the f…
UUSD utility keeps expanding ⚡
Soon, users will be able to launch and trade across all three modes on @fourdotmemezh using $UUSD.
A stronger stablecoin ecosystem.
More ways to participate.
More markets unlocked.
https://x.com/fourdotmemezh/status/2080186199193600229
UXUY’s proprietary perpetual trading system is officially live in public beta ⚡
This is more than a system upgrade, it is a complete reimagining of the next generation of on-chain perpetual trading.
Now entering public beta, the new system delivers a smoother trading experience, more efficient execution, and a more unified journey across assets and markets.
At the same time, UXUY continues to advance AI-powered tr…
UXUY’s proprietary perpetual trading system is planned to go live on July 15, 2026 ⚡
The next generation of perpetual trading is entering its final stage of preparation. Before the new system goes live, users may continue using the existing perpetual trading features as usual, including trading, closing positions, and withdrawing assets.
After the new system launches, users with remaining positions or assets in the…
💪 As the expected trading timeline for the TARX IPO has been delayed, UXUY will extend the subscription period for the TARX IPO project to July 15.
🔥 Tarsier Pharma Ltd. is a late clinical-stage ophthalmic biopharmaceutical company focused on innovative therapies for autoimmune and inflammatory eye diseases, aiming to bring new treatment options for sight-threatening ocular conditions.
🔗 Download the UXUY App to un…
A new era of perpetual trading is coming ⚡
To prepare for the launch of our next-generation perpetual trading system, several features will be temporarily suspended this Friday as part of the upgrade.
The following features will be paused:
•Trading Star ⭐
•Crazy Friday 🎰
·Reward Center 🎁
All other Reward Center benefits remain available as usual.
These adjustments are temporary and they're paving the way for a s…
A new era of perpetual trading is coming ⚡
To prepare for the launch of our next-generation perpetual trading system, several features will be temporarily suspended this Friday as part of the upgrade.
The following features will be paused:
•Trading Star ⭐
•Crazy Friday 🎰
•Perpetual Trading Fee Coupons (Reward Center) 🎁
All other Reward Center benefits remain available as usual.
These adjustments are temporary and…
Bronze Agent will be temporarily unavailable 📢
To prepare for the next phase of our ecosystem, Bronze Agent will be temporarily taken offline on July 9, 2026
This marks a planned transition as we gear up for upcoming ecosystem partner collaborations and the Lighting Program, unlocking new experiences and broader participation opportunities for our community.
Thank you for being part of the journey.
Stay tuned for…
👋 $CBAI IPO subscription is entering its final countdown.
💪 The response to the $CBAI U.S. IPO subscription has exceeded expectations. This round will close on July 6 at 6:00 (UTC). If you plan to participate, now is the time.
🔗 Coolbit Technologies Ltd. ($CBAI) plans to list on Nasdaq. The company focuses on Bitcoin mining, operating through equipment leasing partnerships and third-party hosting providers.
👉 Down…
😁12❤9👏3🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @UXUYcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 260,890 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bridge Oracle @Bridge_Oracle · 129,410 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
QuBitDEX News @QuBitDEX · 103,547 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
CminerBox👑 @cminerboxs · 94,638 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
LuckyCoin @LuckyCoin_Channel · 431,599 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
📊 Bykaranteli.Com @bykaranteli_com · 125,973 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Airdrop Hub @airdrophub_great · 566,859 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
Vanilla Finance News & Updates @vanillafinancenews · 1,134,717 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UXUY I Invest the World with Al+Stablecoin” (@UXUYcom), 1,096,531 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UXUYcom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.