Channel
@bykaranteli_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
110,681subscribers
-16,585 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002076688575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bykaranteli_com |
| Description | The crypto futures terminal We record the crypto derivatives market. We record the crypto derivatives market and prove what we published. Liquidations, funding, open interest, options, ETF flows and CFTC positioning from 50+ venues https://bykaranteli.com |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bykaranteli_com |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 110,681 | -163 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 110,844 | -291 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 111,135 | -150 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 111,285 | -181 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 111,466 | -228 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 111,694 | -310 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 112,004 | -319 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 112,323 | -287 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 112,610 | -216 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 112,826 | -233 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 113,059 | -202 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 113,261 | -291 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 113,552 | -249 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 113,801 | -347 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 114,148 | -869 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 115,017 | -924 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 115,941 | -1,692 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 117,633 | -1,405 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 119,038 | -539 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 119,577 | first reading |
2,510 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 1,167 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,510 (15 August 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 27,330 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
18 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 94.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 October 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Long crowding is the pattern, led by $EVAA with 62.78% OI and 0.0467% funding. OI build with one sided funding is crowding, OI drop with flat funding is deleveraging, and funding without OI build is positioning without new money; the rest of the set also includes $1000PEPE at 16.08% OI and 0.0248% funding and $BLESS at 63.6% OI and 0.0206% funding.
Chainlink had the thinnest order book of the eight we track on Oct 28. Walking the live $LINK book at 14:00 UTC, a $1.0M market order would have given up an estimated 19.6 bps between the quoted price and its average fill. The same modeled order in $BTC came to an estimated 0.5 bps. Ether followed at 1.1 bps, Solana at 2.8 bps and XRP at 4.8 bps. At the thin end, $ADA came next at 18.7 bps, then Dogecoin at 10 bps …
Two walls of resting orders boxed in Bitcoin's spot price on Oct 28, each within one 0.1% step of $80,517. Sellers had $37.3M parked at $80,557 and buyers had $35.5M at $80,476, across 21 spot venues at 13:57 UTC. Widen the view to 2% either side and buyers carry more size. Bids came to $167.6M against $149.0M of asks, a 5.9% tilt to the bid side. Ether's books looked much the same near $2,330. Walls of $17.4M at $…
US spot Bitcoin ETFs drew a net $176.0M on Oct 27, and IBIT alone accounted for $151.5M of it. Ether ETFs went the opposite way the same day, with a net -$60.2M. The Bitcoin side lines up with its five day count, which stands at a net $41.3M for the period ending Oct 27. Day and week point the same direction, though the weekly figure is far smaller than the single day. Bitcoin ETF net assets were $103.94B as of Oct…
❤1
Leveraged buyers carry the heavier side of Ether's estimated liquidation map on Oct 28. At 13:00 UTC, with $ETH at $2,340, more modeled exposure within 3% of price sits below it, on long positions. The closest modeled long level is $2,332, only a few dollars under the price. The larger long cluster is estimated at $2,267. Above, the nearest modeled short level is $2,376 and the larger one $2,433, where sellers would…
Bitcoin has moved out of the range where its perpetual traders spent most of yesterday's session, and Ether has not. $BTC trades at $80,788.50 ahead of the US open, above a zone that ran from $79,555.19 to $80,556.64. That zone holds 70% of the session's trading time. Bitcoin's most traded price was $79,815.57, and the session closed at $80,868.50, +1.32% over it. $ETH sits inside its own zone at $2,341.64. That ra…
Bitcoin options traders are paying for a fairly ordinary amount of movement. Deribit's volatility index, DVOL, reads 37.7. It measures how large a swing option buyers price in for $BTC over the next 30 days. That reading ranks at the 60th percentile of the past 90 days, near the middle of a 90 day range that runs from 33.6 to 43.5. The cost of buying protection is a touch above its recent midpoint and below the 43.…
HTX was the only venue to add a perpetual contract in the 24 hours to 12:30 UTC on Oct 28. Our collectors watch six futures exchanges, and the other five listed nothing new in that window. The single addition is $BA, first seen on HTX at 04:52 UTC. It trades on that one exchange alone, so anyone trading it on leverage has a single order book to deal with and no second venue to compare prices against.
IV surface, skew, options flow, and open interest with gamma walls from 5 venues, on the free API key. 15,000 calls a month.
Binance Coin drew the biggest wave of new futures bets among the majors in the 24 hours to Oct 28, 11:35 UTC. Open interest, the value of futures positions still open, grew 6.08% while the price gained 2.82%. Buyers drove the build, and funding of 0.01% means they pay sellers only a small fee to stay in. Cardano is the only other major where buyers led the build. Its open interest grew 5% on a 1.57% price gain, with…
Short sellers carried more of Bitcoin's estimated liquidation exposure near the price at 11:00 UTC on Oct 28, with $BTC at $81,458. Within 3% of that price, more modeled exposure sat above it than below. The first modeled short level is $81,858, with the largest short cluster just past it at $81,953. Those are the prices where bets against Bitcoin would be forced to buy back. On the long side, the nearest estimated…
Neither side of the big money won the 24 hours to 10:00 UTC on Oct 28. Whale sized buy orders totalled $6.67B and sells $6.59B, which leaves buyers with 50.3% of large order flow. That sits well inside the 45% to 55% range we treat as two sided. The flow came across 6,938 large orders. $BTC drew the most of it with 3,688 orders, $ETH followed with 2,880, and $SOL was a distant third with 152. The single largest ord…
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,510 posts we hold for @bykaranteli_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📊 Bykaranteli.Com” (@bykaranteli_com), 110,681 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bykaranteli_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.