Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адель и МЛь

Channel

Адель и МЛь

@adel_and_ml

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,067subscribers

+375 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001801466871
TypeChannel
Username@adel_and_ml
CreatedBetween 1 September 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adel_and_ml

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6824,0713,876.56 August 2026 — 3,692 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,690 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,691 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,687 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,755 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,764 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,763 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,780 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,790 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,794 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,062 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,071 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,067 subscribers4,0676 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +375. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,624–4,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:014,067-4
14 Sept 2026, 05:364,071+9
10 Sept 2026, 09:584,062+268
5 Sept 2026, 07:393,794+4
1 Sept 2026, 04:283,790+10
29 Aug 2026, 03:083,780+17
26 Aug 2026, 07:433,763-1
23 Aug 2026, 12:083,764+9
19 Aug 2026, 14:333,755+73
16 Aug 2026, 07:543,682-5
12 Aug 2026, 15:333,687-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:413,691+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:283,690-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:333,692first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

730 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁24233.2%
👍15721.5%
🔥15621.4%
10113.8%
🌚334.52%
🤯304.11%
🤔111.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 730 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adel_and_ml. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,470 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Только я хотел похвалить Inkling Small, как вышел Deepseek V4-Flash 0731 с каким-то бешеными показателями. Хотя Inkling мультимодальный и принимает на вход текст, картинки и аудио, а дипсик - text only. Обе модели похожи по размеру - ~280B A13B. Deepseek умнее и дешевле GPT 5.6 Luna (xhigh) (хоть и медленнее) и при этом openweights. Большеват, конечно, но хотя бы не 3Т. https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V

🔥6👍5🤯42

30 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC≈1,910 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

OpenAI подкрутили свой harness и модель выбила 38.3% против старых 13.3% на ARC-AGI-3 🤷‍♂️ Многие еще от промпт инжиниринга не отошли, а тут уже харнесс инжинирингом пора заниматься. А то тоже скоро устареет. https://openai.com/index/how-two-settings-tripled-our-arc-agi-3-scores/

🔥16😁7👍53🌚3

16 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC≈3,410 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вышла Kimi K3 - Безумные 2.8Т параметров. Дома такой оренсорс не погоняешь, конечно. - По бенчам и оценке Artificial Analysis - уровня Opus 4.8 и тянется к 5.6 и Fable. Дешевле Опуса в cost per task примерно в два раза - Они там снова что-то подкрутили в Attention, чтоб был быстрый-быстрый декодинг и эффективное обучение. - Очень хорошо может во фронтенд А так хочется чего-то нового в районе 30-100B https://ww

🔥25👍126

15 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC≈29,400 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Насколько же сильно меняется работа, когда есть ИИ агенты. Мой коллега, биоинформатик, увидел статью, в которой хитрым образом находят специфичные гены в картошке. Понял, что это может быть полезно для нашего отдела по селекции клубники. Потому что и то, и другое распространяется вегетативно - то есть не через семена, а усы и клубни - они не родня, конечно, но в генетическом плане есть о чем поговорить, так сказать.

🔥65👍17😁1412

11 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC≈5,260 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Короткая рекомендация по GPT-5.6: Terra, похоже, можно смело пропускать. По графику Artificial Analysis у неё нет своего sweet spot: при той же цене Sol умнее, а при сопоставимом качестве Luna дешевле. Похоже вот это хороший сетап: Luna High - дефолтная модель, повседневный кодинг, мелкие фиксы и обычные задачи. Sol High - сложные баги, архитектура, планирование и ревью. С Ultra осторожнее: она спамит сабагента

👍37😁32🔥105

3 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC≈3,680 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

А почему не на виниле? https://x.com/github/status/2072801888525840476?s=46

😁17🤯9🌚5👍2

1 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC≈38,200 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Artificial Analysis померили стоимость Sonnet 5 на задачу (per task), и у них получилось, что он дороже Opus 4.8 на 15% и что это вообще одна из самых дорогих моделей, уступая только Fable 5. https://x.com/artificialanlys/status/2072062592923930666?s=46

😁29🤔7

30 Jun 2026, 05:49 UTC≈5,720 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересный сервис - AI Values показывает, с какой LLM у вас больше всего совпадают ценности и стиль мышления. Проходишь сценарии с моральными и вкусовыми дилеммами, а сайт сравнивает твои ответы с разными моделями. Можно пройти тест на 15 вопросов и потом затюнить на еще на 100. https://ai-values.com Я попал в opus 4.8 🤔

12🌚2🔥2

26 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTC≈134,000 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

OpenAI выкатывают своего Mythos. GPT-5.6 - новая серия моделей: Sol - флагман, Terra и Luna поменьше и быстрее. Terra обещают примерно на уровне GPT-5.5, но в 2 раза дешевле. Sol тренировали с упором на agentic coding, biology/genomics и cybersecurity. Появляются новые режимы: max reasoning effort для более глубокого reasoning и ultra mode, где модель использует subagents(!) для сложных задач. Модель стала сильн

12🔥4👍3😁2🌚1

16 Jun 2026, 19:41 UTC≈4,910 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот и Cursor как раз тизерят новую модель. - модель на 1.5Т параметров - тренировали с нуля, никаких файнтюнов Kimi - использовали 100k+ GPU - на Колосусе тренировали, в общем - презентуют, как агентскую модель - beyond just coding - доступна станет через пару недель Очень интересно, что у них получилось, Composer выходили неплохие. Вот тут есть видео, если кому-то интересно.

19👍10

16 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC≈3,520 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

SpaceX покупают Cursor за $60 миллиардов. Сделка еще не закрыта, но они уже подписали соглашение о покупке. Закрытие сделки ожидается в Q3 2026. https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/spacex-to-acquire-cursor-for-60b-in-stock-days-after-blockbuster-ipo/ P.S. Ну не получилось у xAI, бывает.

🤯17👍7

16 Jun 2026, 09:47 UTC≈3,780 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Artificial Analysis обновили свой Intelligence Index. Его заметно сдвинули в сторону agentic workloads и выкинули старые уже насыщенные бенчи. Некоторые конкретно поменяли: - Terminal-Bench Hard заменили на Terminal-Bench 2.1 - более свежий и сложный набор задач для агентских сценариев. - τ²-Bench Telecom заменили на τ³-Bench Banking - тоже более реалистичные и тяжёлые агентские задачи. - GDPval-AA обновили до GDPv

👍158🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @adel_and_ml. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sber AI
@SberAIScience · 27,279
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 29,146
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адель и МЛь” (@adel_and_ml), 4,067 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adel_and_ml.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.