Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Народные инициативы-общественный контроль

Channel

Народные инициативы-общественный контроль

@alikinalubov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

334subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702191158
TypeChannel
Username@alikinalubov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alikinalubov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3283343316 August 2026 — 328 subscribers6 August 2026 — 328 subscribers14 August 2026 — 329 subscribers21 August 2026 — 330 subscribers28 August 2026 — 331 subscribers16 September 2026 — 334 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 327–335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:16334+3
28 Aug 2026, 16:33331+1
21 Aug 2026, 19:58330+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:16329+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:47328no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:04328first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2552.1%
🤬510.4%
🤯510.4%
👍48.33%
🔥36.25%
😨24.17%
🤣24.17%
😁12.08%
🥱12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Только я не согласна с проектом "Байкал - великое озеро великой страны".

2

5 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://voop-rf.ru/tpost/6ztyocl591-turizm-udar-po-baikalu-i-okrestnostyam

1

5 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/blc6GGHe_Hs?is=Z40Ez39KnHlMtfeX

1

5 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC41 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @burassrPhoto

Нигде такого дикарства нет чтобы кедры рубили. А у нас есть. Самые шикарные места Байкала вырубают, Бухта Безымянная. Бог вам судья. Природоохранная прокуратура, возьмите пожалуйста на контроль.

5🤯3

5 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC38 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @golosbaikalaFile

Экологическая экспертиза запретила рубки леса в бухте Безымянной на Байкале. А они идут По ситуации с рубками в бухте Безымянной на Байкале получен ответ регионального Росприроднадзора. Из ответа следует, что проведенная государственная экологическая экспертиза проекта запрещает вырубку древесной растительности. Тем более запрещены сплошные рубки. Но рубки, согласно сведениям, поступившим ранее, идут. Все видели вид

3🤯2

5 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alternativapravo

https://m.47news.ru/articles/290770/

5 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alternativapravo

Готов компенсировать ущерб, но в не в тех объемах, которые просят родственники - я в отставке, нет таких доходов, пускай решает размеры компенсации суд. Готов ответить, следствие просто соблюдает установленный УПК РФ порядок возбуждения дела в отношении спецсубъекта, он долгий. И всех водителей можно назвать потенциальными убийцами. И все, понимаете, все, новость пшик. Интереса ноль, обычная история наезда на чело

5 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC35 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alternativapravo

Так интересно получилось, одна случайная статья замкнула круг долгих размышлений. Их изложение получилось объемное, не судите строго. Кому-то они покажутся банальными, кому-то глупыми, кто-то может задумается, но поехали… Несколько лет я веду публичный канал, но не устаю удивляться тому, как все работает. Начать нужно издалека. Вот уже год в СМИ идет кампания против судейского сообщества. Несколько десятков новосте

2 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC51 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://ekogradmoscow.ru/2012-11-25-08-44-50/2012-11-25-08-49-32/iskusstvo-ne-videt

1 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC54 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bolshaya_gorlicaVideo

Почти 7 миллионов за защиту природы: угольщики требуют взыскать расходы с истцов Друзья, всем большой экологический привет! 👋🌲 🎥 В видео-обращении Александр Соснов рассказывает о том, каково это - защищать природу Байкальского региона, идти против крупного угольного проекта и понимать, чем это может обернуться для обычных людей. Как наши читатели уже, наверное, знают, в апелляции мы проиграли суд по делу об эколог

🤬54🤣2🥱1😁1

30 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC80 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kostenko_irkPhoto

Год назад, находясь с рабочей поездкой в Татарстане, я обратил внимание на отсутствие хаотично разбросанных и мешающих пешеходам электросамокатов. В Казани муниципалитет строго определил места для их стоянки — и этот порядок реально работает. Год назад я написал: «Вижу любопытную практику для нашего региона и города. А вы?» Прошёл год. Объективная необходимость навести порядок с электросамокатами в Иркутске никуда

29 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC74 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bg_irkutskPhoto

⚡️⚡️⚡️Пескодобытчиков (таких, как Дикунов в Приангарье) действующее законодательство оберегает А вот памятники природы не очень Такой вывод можно сделать из ответа Правительства Кобзева на запрос газеты «Байкальская Сибирь». Поводом для направления запроса СМИ стало горделивое сообщение регчиновников на официальном портале Иркутская область о том, что у памятника природы «Игирминский сосновый бор» установлена охра

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @alikinalubov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Народные инициативы-общественный контроль” (@alikinalubov), 334 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alikinalubov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.