Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,494–24,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:00
24,561
-8
16 Sept 2026, 12:17
24,569
-2
14 Sept 2026, 19:39
24,571
-4
13 Sept 2026, 02:39
24,575
-3
11 Sept 2026, 04:20
24,578
-8
8 Sept 2026, 08:18
24,586
-14
4 Sept 2026, 23:36
24,600
-7
3 Sept 2026, 09:27
24,607
-2
2 Sept 2026, 04:56
24,609
-10
1 Sept 2026, 07:28
24,619
-19
31 Aug 2026, 08:47
24,638
-7
30 Aug 2026, 08:18
24,645
+4
29 Aug 2026, 09:27
24,641
-4
28 Aug 2026, 07:58
24,645
+9
27 Aug 2026, 07:05
24,636
-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:44
24,640
+4
22 Aug 2026, 13:15
24,636
+7
20 Aug 2026, 08:46
24,629
+13
19 Aug 2026, 05:25
24,616
+9
18 Aug 2026, 08:02
24,607
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 24,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,710
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
19 (23 May 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
7,410
Reactions total
637
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 53s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,655 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,637
69.7%
🥰
969
14.6%
🔥
490
7.36%
🎉
312
4.69%
😁
92
1.38%
👍
76
1.14%
🤩
69
1.04%
👏
10
0.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С Днём знаний всех❤️
А нас, с родительским почином, можно сказать🫣
Первые супер тревожные ночи и переживания, которых не испытывали никогда раньше.
Первые ошибки - безусловно доверились педиатру и не включая рациональное мышление и мозг - намазали рекомендованный крем на акне новорожденных- в итоге получили жуткое воспаление😢
Только спустя 2 дня и 4 консультации с разными педиатрами - пришли к тому, что воспаление на…
Нам 2 недели ❤️🤭👼🏻
ровно 14 дней назад мы стали
родителями. И это лучшее, что могло случиться в нашей
ЖИЗНИ🙏🏻
Наша булочка спасибо, что выбрала нас❤️
безгранично любим тебя❤️
Добро пожаловать в этот мир, наша принцесса 👸🏻
11.08 в 12:11 мы стали родителями👼🏻 самыми счастливыми на свете🙏🏻
Спасибо, доченька, что выбрала нас❤️❤️❤️ мы тебя очень любим, наша сладкая булочка 🥰
Спасибо моему любимому за то, что был рядом каждую секунду и я еще раз поняла, что уже подарила дочке самый ценный подарок - лучшего папу в мире🙏🏻
И спасибо всем за поздравления 🫶
Всех целую❤️ ну а я потихоньку привыкаю …
⚡️❗️❗️
Пока я в декрете, мой проект, который я создавала по крупицам больше 4-х лет, работает.
В боте @goodmo_annabuzova_bot сейчас идет закрытый набор в новый поток.
Я этим постом не буду вас мотивировать, давить и агрессивно призывать к действию, ведь вы и так знаете, что двигаться полезно, что утро задаёт тон дню, что забота о себе это важно.
Также я не буду обещать, что через 28 дней вы станете неузнаваемы.
…
Потихоньку готовимся к самой долгожданной встрече👼🏻🥰
Если говорить о моих супер слабых сторонах - так это всё, что касается выбора😭 а выбор сегодня всех детских товаров - не просто большой, он ОГРОМНЫЙ🙈 и как понять - что будет лучше для твоей малышки - я, честно говоря, не знаю🤣
Мной просмотрены все обзоры на кроватки, стульчики, шезлонги, коляски и автокресла и, плюсом, неделя мучений менеджеров puzatikbaby.ru (спа…
☀️Последний старт перед большим перерывом
Июнь. Лето только началось, а у нас важная новость.
Я запускаю новый поток «Доброго утра» в последний раз перед декретом.
Ближайшие три месяца продаж в её блоге не предвидится.
Поэтому этот набор — ваш шанс войти в мягкие тренировки прямо сейчас, пока солнце и длинные дни сами тянут нас двигаться.
Какие условия?
🌸 1 поток (новичкам) — 1 990 ₽
Всё, как вы любите: програм…
14 февраля 2026 года мы узнали, кто ты, наш маленький человечек❤️👼🏻
Это был самый волнительный
момент в моей жизни, И самый прекрасный одновременно🫶
Мы тебя очень любим и ждём
❤️❤️❤️❤️
❤456🥰105🔥54🎉29🤩2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @annabuzova1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ирина Агибалова @agibalova_irinaa · 64,439 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
Olya Des @olyades1 · 29,385 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
Не Kostenko.94 @kostenko1994 · 25,018 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
Варвина Наталья @varvina_n · 194,946 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Чат с Дарьей Пынзарь 🌸 @DaryaPinzar86 · 68,983 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
Ольга Гажиенко @olgagajienko1 · 49,309 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anna Buzova” (@annabuzova1), 24,561 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annabuzova1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.