Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрій Попик

Channel

Андрій Попик

@apopyk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,105subscribers

+2,008 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178640815
TypeChannel
Username@apopyk
Created10 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/apopyk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,07221,33420,2036 August 2026 — 19,097 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,101 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,089 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,109 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,096 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,072 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,118 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,162 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,233 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,307 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,391 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,532 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,612 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,748 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,922 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,183 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,300 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,437 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,553 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,700 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,869 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,020 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,080 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,123 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,334 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,313 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,256 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,215 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,200 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,150 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,105 subscribers21,1056 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,008. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,733–21,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:4021,105-45
16 Sept 2026, 08:1721,150-50
14 Sept 2026, 16:5821,200-15
13 Sept 2026, 02:3921,215-41
11 Sept 2026, 07:1821,256-57
8 Sept 2026, 14:1821,313-21
5 Sept 2026, 11:3621,334+211
3 Sept 2026, 10:4821,123+43
2 Sept 2026, 07:1321,080+60
1 Sept 2026, 06:2721,020+151
31 Aug 2026, 07:2220,869+169
30 Aug 2026, 04:5520,700+147
29 Aug 2026, 05:4320,553+116
28 Aug 2026, 02:0620,437+137
27 Aug 2026, 01:4420,300+117
26 Aug 2026, 01:5420,183+261
25 Aug 2026, 00:4719,922+174
23 Aug 2026, 10:1719,748+136
21 Aug 2026, 18:2619,612+80
20 Aug 2026, 15:5319,532first reading

Engagement

171 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 21,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 171 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held171 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total87,169
Reactions total4,672
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 52s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,877 reactions across 152 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5,60028.2%
😁4,59023.1%
💯2,86114.4%
👍2,62713.2%
1,3406.74%
🤣9985.02%
🤡2661.34%
🤮1890.951%
👏1660.835%
🥰1330.669%
😢1170.589%
👎1060.533%
🤔1000.503%
❤‍🔥980.493%
🤬980.493%
🙏890.448%
🤯800.402%
🍾720.362%
🤩650.327%
🤝290.146%
28 further kinds2531.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 152 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,877 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC419 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кажуть це обід в одній з шкіл Чернівецької області. Запіканка, шмат хліба, сира ціла морква... Оприлюднив батько учня. Найстрашніше, що це все не помилка однієї людини. Це все затверджували, закупали, розкладали по тарілкам десятки різних людей і ніхто не сказав ні слова, і ні в кого не йокнуло. Якби дітям наклали щебінь з мазутом, думаю так само ніхто не моргнув би оком..

🤬16🤯111🤡1😢1

3 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,470 views150 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ахаха! В Полтаві в ботанічному саду замісь бюста сашка гарматного поставили Шекспіра. Хороший тролінг, але Байрон був би більш стьобним. Не треба нам всіх цих уюшкіних. Згодні?

👍123🔥175🥰3🎉1🤮1

2 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC≈2,050 views179 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Німці нарешті прикрили "рузкій дом" в Берліні. Касатки походу починають просинатись.

😁92🔥55👍248

2 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈2,310 views171 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥Ахаха! На митинг за русские школы в Латвии пришло всего 20 человек. Руководители пророссийских партий. Даже не собрали родителей одного класса. вот и вся суть русской пропаганды в Латвии! ВИДЕО ТУТ https://youtu.be/h4DZdBJJFB4

😁106🔥50👍6🥰63

1 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC≈2,540 views67 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔥Всьо. Шахед з'їбався 😁

🔥578🤡2

1 Sept 2026, 21:45 UTC≈2,560 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔥класний був стрім. закінчили трішки раніше бо повідомляють що реактивний шахед над Хмельницьким. то чілимо в укритті 😎

🙏4614🥰6🤡4

1 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,560 views89 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔵🟡наші друзі з Правого Сектора, Дана Виноградова яка на війні з 2014 року збирає на ремонт авто прошу всіх читачів долучитись. Знаю Дану особисто. монобанка Дани на збір для ремонту авто https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8ixnojrruL КАРТА МОНОБАНКИ 4874100031792917 🔴наши друзья из Правого Сектора, Дана Виноградова которая на войне с 2014 году собирает на ремонт авто. Прошу всех читателей присоединиться!

69🔥14🥰3👍2🖕1

1 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈2,390 views77 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Всі кинулись обговорювати, що Федоров запропонував США створити армію дронів в обмін на ракети Patriot. А американці про це взагалі знають? Ось я спитав в чатажпт щоб він мені надав посилання, де в американських виданнях це обговорюється. І що відповів той штучний інтелект? --------------- Щодо американських видань: поки що я не знаходжу великого американського ЗМІ рівня NYT, Washington Post, CNN, CBS, NBC чи WSJ,

👍41🤔17💯124🖕2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @apopyk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MrRissso
@mrrissso63 · 21,620
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрій Попик” (@apopyk), 21,105 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apopyk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.