Posted without readable text
❤19👍5

Channel
@axdentist
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,372subscribers
+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001674048609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @axdentist |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/axdentist |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 10,372 | -24 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 10,396 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 10,414 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 10,427 | -26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 10,453 | -34 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 10,487 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 10,509 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 10,522 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:54 | 10,526 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 10,534 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 10,546 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 10,560 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 10,567 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 10,578 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 10,592 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 10,611 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 10,625 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 10,646 | -32 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 10,678 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 10,675 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (20 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 640 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
443 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 175 | 39.5% | |
| ❤ | 149 | 33.6% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 14.9% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 4.74% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 4.29% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 2.71% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquvdYci | 1 | 21 July 2026 | 21 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Posted without readable text
❤19👍5
Нам всем крупно повезло, что в свои 8 лет Денис шлепнулся с турника и сломал зуб. Родители сразу отвели его в поликлинику, где он замер в немом восхищении. Это нормальные люди не любят стойкий запах антисептиков, стерильность медицинских кабинетов, вид инструментов и оборудования. Денис же обомлел и решил, что хочет провести в этом царстве чистоты всю жизнь. И теперь в нашей команде великолепный стоматолог-терапевт…
🔥19❤6👏3
Posted without readable text
❤1👍1
Тогда мы ещё не знали, к чему Саша готовится😅 но видели, что он готов!
🔥6❤1👍1
Сегодня будут слёзы, несмотря на наши улыбки на видео. Пока держимся всем коллективом. С Александром мы семь лет, а теперь он будет заведовать своим скалодромом в Сочи. Не буду врать, что это разлука дается легко, Саша надежный, порядочный, профессиональный доктор и просто отличный человек. Других не держим. Мы знаем, что многие пациенты точно так же прикипели к Александру, благодарны ему за труды и с теплотой вспо…
❤13😢10👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7😢5👍1
Запреты и отказы не всегда продиктованы исключительно заботой. Иногда это понимание врачом, что его ресурс ограничен в данной ситуации. Поэтому всегда идем за вторым мнением, друзья! Не грузится видео? Смотрите нас в Максе https://max.ru/channel_axdentist/AaAKcXSncyM
❤11🔥6👍1
Отказ в коррекции прикуса. С одной стороны можно расценивать как заботу о сохранности зубов, над которыми нависла реальная угроза и которым не стоит добавлять нагрузки в видео ортодонтической тяги. С другой стороны, мы не знаем: может убыль костной ткани как раз-таки усугубляется проблемным прикусом! Основная причина убыли костной ткани - пародонтит. Воспалительное заболевание тканей пародонта, то есть зубоудержи…
❤9👍1
Posted without readable text
🔥14❤2
На летучку собираемся?! Пока я рассекал водную гладь карельских озёр, выпал из скандалов, интриг, расследований, коими нас постоянно балует интернет-пространство. Вы же все успели насладиться громким вторжением Летучей в стоматологическую клинику? Не буду долго оценивать саму подачу ведущей. Едкое выражение лица, нахрап, колкость и провокационность всех жестов. Как вербальных, так и невербальных. Мне важнее суть п…
👍18
Карелия во всей своей летней красе! Человек, лодка, собака, пытающаяся, если не сгрызть, то понадкусывать оборудование! Что ещё надо??? Под дождь попасть✅ Пикник на камнях организовать✅ Вымотаться и вернуться счастливыми✅ Пёс подтверждает.
🔥23👏3❤1👍1👎1
Человек просто так, без ожидания денег,стоит с этим плакатом. Не знаю, почему и зачем, я не спросил. Только поинтересовался, можно ли сфотографировать, и все. Но от самого факта бескорыстного такого «стояния» кусок ватмана работает как снаряд.
❤14🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @axdentist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как считаете, меня надули? Просто хотели, чтобы я уехал? Или реально сотрудницы проявили заботу?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Axdent Стоматология/ лечение/ имплантация/ ортодонтия/ Москва” (@axdentist), 10,372 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/axdentist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.