Channel
@banki_economy
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
1,073,738subscribers
+26,747 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002409669849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @banki_economy |
| Description | Она такая одна. Быстро пишем про банки, экономику и всё, что с ними связано. По рекламе: @whoisdonny Помощник: @justcage Работаем с @bidfox_news и @Spiral_Miya Регистрация в РКН: https://rkn.link/Ryz |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/banki_economy |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @banki_economy/26913 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC | @economic_newz/59506 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC | 0.97 | 2 minutes |
| @banki_economy/26975 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC | @economic_newz/59837 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC | 0.96 | under a minute |
| @banki_economy/26923 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC | @economic_newz/59556 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC | 0.95 | 2 minutes |
| @banki_economy/26919 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC | @economic_newz/59546 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC | 0.94 | under a minute |
| @banki_economy/26928 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC | @economic_newz/59606 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC | 0.94 | under a minute |
| @banki_economy/26937 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC | @economic_newz/59646 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC | 0.93 | 8 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @economic_newz | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | 72 seconds | this entry (8–0) |
| @moneytochki | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 55 minutes | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 74 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @banki_economy — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 1,073,738 | -11,706 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 1,085,444 | -4,248 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 1,089,692 | -3,540 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 1,093,232 | -279 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 1,093,511 | -2,555 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 1,096,066 | -4,335 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 1,100,401 | +8,628 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 1,091,773 | +2,454 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 1,089,319 | +616 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:23 | 1,088,703 | +3,085 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 1,085,618 | -2,699 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,088,317 | -4,840 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 1,093,157 | -4,614 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 1,097,771 | +1,608 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 1,096,163 | +489 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 1,095,674 | -4,822 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 1,100,496 | -4,969 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 1,105,465 | -791 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 1,106,256 | +7,440 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 1,098,816 | first reading |
1,711 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,711 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 24,822,185 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 105 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 836 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (29 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 806 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 31.0% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 71.0% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 22,200 views — 2.07% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 27,100).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2884828 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC | 426 minutes – 2.0 hours old | 3,610 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 2,750still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 26 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884728 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC | 920 minutes – 4.1 hours old | 9,720 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 6,074 interp. → 3.0 hours: 9,180still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 40 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884628 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC | 1022 minutes – 4.6 hours old | 12,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 8,099 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 40 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884528 Sept 2026, 18:34 UTC | 1026 minutes – 4.7 hours old | 14,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 8,681 interp. → 3.0 hours: 13,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 41 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884428 Sept 2026, 18:07 UTC | 1118 minutes – 5.1 hours old | 14,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 8,292 interp. → 3.0 hours: 12,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 48 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884328 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC | 1277 seconds – 5.4 hours old | 14,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 8,113 interp. → 3.0 hours: 13,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 54 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884228 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC | 1324 minutes – 6.3 hours old | 17,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 7,209 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,908 interp. → 6.0 hours: 17,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 74 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2884128 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC | 1418 minutes – 6.8 hours old | 17,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 7,421 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,900 → 6.0 hours: 17,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 81 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwJUrgb | 1 | 31 August 2026 | 31 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Российский бизнес в ловушке: прибыль падает, но зарплаты приходится повышать. В первом полугодии прибыль крупных и средних компаний снизилась на 11%, тогда как реальные зарплаты выросли на 6,5%. Чтобы удерживать сотрудников на фоне роста стоимости жизни, работодатели вынуждены платить больше даже без сопоставимого роста производительности. В ответ компании сокращают издержки и штат, автоматизируют процессы и внедряют…
Очевидно, что в России свободнее, чем в Европе, — Володин. @banki_economy
Нам не хватает Жириновского, особенно сейчас, — Путин. @banki_economy
Зюганов пожаловался Путину на квитанцию за ЖКХ на 30 тысяч рублей. На встрече с президентом лидер КПРФ поднял тему роста коммунальных тарифов и рассказал о собственных расходах. «Я сорок лет в Москве живу, мне Андропов квартиру дал. Но вот сейчас мне “жировку” на 30 тысяч принесли», — рассказал Зюганов. @banki_economy
Победа, безусловно, будет за Россией, — Путин. @banki_economy
Кушнер и Уиткофф не привезли в Киев собственного плана завершения конфликта, а фактически передали условия российской стороны, рассчитывая, что Украина их примет, — «Украинская правда» со ссылкой на источник. Собеседник издания считает, что такой подход не приведет к миру, и опасается продолжения российских атак по Украине. @banki_economy
Путин увеличил штатную численность Вооруженных сил России до 2,441 млн человек, из которых 1,55 млн — военнослужащие. Ранее штат ВС РФ составлял 2,389 млн человек, включая 1,5 млн военнослужащих. Таким образом, общая численность увеличивается примерно на 52 тысячи человек, а число военнослужащих — на 50 тысяч. @banki_economy
Путин встретился с главой ЦИК Эллой Памфиловой. Президент поблагодарил ее и сотрудников избирательных комиссий за проделанную работу. @banki_economy
Оснований для новой мобилизации в России нет, — заявил первый зампред Комитета Госдумы по обороне Андрей Красов. @banki_economy
Москвичам с одним ребенком потребуется доход минимум 240 тысяч рублей в месяц, чтобы получить семейную ипотеку на новых условиях. После введения дифференцированных ставок требования к доходу вырастут в 1,4 раза для семей с одним ребенком, в 1,3 раза — с двумя и в 1,1 раза — с тремя. Для семей с четырьмя детьми требования останутся прежними, а с пятью и более — снизятся. @banki_economy
Топливо из опилок и шелухи от семечек разработали в России. Ученые уже испытали новый биокеросин на авиационном двигателе: он снижает уровень выбросов и шума, однако тяга оказалась примерно на 10% ниже. Пока биотопливо стоит дороже обычного керосина и не может полностью его заменить, поэтому использовать его планируют в составе топливных смесей. @banki_economy
Путин разрешил компании «Софтэкс» выкупить российскую «дочку» Western Union. @banki_economy
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,711 posts we hold for @banki_economy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@banki_economy edited 16 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 59 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 96 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русская экономика” (@banki_economy), 1,073,738 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/banki_economy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.