❗️ВНИМАНИЕ ВСЕМ❗️ Продолжаются массивные атаки по всем регионам России. Наши ПВО за сутки сбивают ТЮСЯЧИ дронов. Во многих областях введен режим ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО ПОЛОЖЕНИЯ. Всем настоятельно рекомендуем следить за ситуацией в специальных каналах вашего города! КАНАЛЫ БУДУТ РАБОТАТЬ ДАЖЕ БЕЗ МОБИЛЬНОЙ СВЯЗИ. Убедительная просьба, найти свой город и подписаться: Москва: @msklive Питер: @petrlive Абакан: @abknlive Арха…

Channel
Белгород С-400🚀🇷🇺
@belgorodc400
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,567subscribers
-370 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001841116964 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @belgorodc400 |
| Description | Главные события Белгородской области. Информация по приграничью и не только! По рекламе: @dchouse, @malikk116 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/belgorodc400 |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 49,567 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 49,577 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 49,593 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 49,599 | -18 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 49,617 | -7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 49,624 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 49,643 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 49,653 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 49,656 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 49,671 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 49,677 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 49,691 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 49,694 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 49,696 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 49,706 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 49,719 | -26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 49,745 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:09 | 49,761 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 49,769 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 49,785 | first reading |
Engagement
424 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.54%
- avg views ÷ 49,567 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,250
- 260 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.626%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 260
- of 424 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 249 of 260 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 424 (6 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 584,516 |
| Reactions total | 3,524 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,600
- Videos
- ≈5,620
- Links
- ≈9,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 59m 42s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,633 reactions across 408 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 1,275 | 22.6% | |
| ❤ | 972 | 17.3% | |
| 🙏 | 861 | 15.3% | |
| 👎 | 573 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 525 | 9.32% | |
| 😱 | 507 | 9.00% | |
| 😢 | 248 | 4.40% | |
| 👏 | 239 | 4.24% | |
| 🔥 | 142 | 2.52% | |
| 🤯 | 97 | 1.72% | |
| 😭 | 92 | 1.63% | |
| ❤🔥 | 49 | 0.87% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 0.692% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 411 of the 424 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 424 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.236%
- 1 of 424 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 584
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 2,230
- over 423 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJ4UbPw | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 424 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Mr. Freeman поставил 3.000.000 рублей на свой железный матч! Он убеждён, что достаточно делать одну ставку в день, чтобы быть в стабильном плюсе! На данный момент его статистика по железным матчам 1496+ 26-🤯 Статистика последних ставок: 2,17✅ 1,92✅ 2,15✅ 2,02✅ 2,27✅ 2,02✅ 2,08✅ 2,31✅ 🔎КАНАЛ ПРОШЁЛ НЕЗАВИСИМУЮ ПРОВЕРКУ!🤝 Уже завтра он будет отдавать этот матч за 100.000₽❗️Специально договорились, чтобы каждый смог…
👎3
🚛 Курьеров на электровелосипедах хотят приравнять к мопедам Глава СПЧ Валерий Фадеев предложил выдавать водительские права доставщикам на электровелосипедах. Транспорт получат номерные знаки, а нарушения начнут фиксировать камеры. «Нарушил — штраф, второй раз — лишение прав. Без прав он уже не сможет ездить», — заявил Фадеев, назвав меру «очень простым решением». С января по август 2026 года в России произошло бол…
👍32👎13❤4
Беспилотник ударил по школе в Новом Осколе По данным оперштаба, пострадавших нет. Повреждён фасад здания. Местные уже оценивают последствия. Держим руку на пульсе. Белгород C-400🚀🇷🇺
🤬6🙏2
❗️Женщина пострадала при атаке FPV-дрона в Грайвороне Она получила осколочные ранения ног. Пострадавшую доставили в Грайворонскую ЦРБ, после оказания помощи её транспортируют в городскую больницу №2 Белгорода. 🙏 Скорейшего выздоровления! Белгород C-400🚀🇷🇺
🙏7
🔊 Шум в «Тату баре» на Славянской не даёт спать жителям Посетители заведения до 6 утра мешают местным жителям. По словам очевидцев, люди пьют и кричат, а полиция на вызовы не приезжает. «Творится беспредел», — жалуются горожане. Ждём реакции от ответственных служб. Белгород C-400🚀🇷🇺
🤬7👍1
🔊 Ночь с дронами: Чернянский округ под обстрелом Жители округа сообщают о неспокойной ночи: более 10 пролётов беспилотников и свыше пяти взрывов. Подробности уточняются. Белгород C-400🚀🇷🇺
🙏6❤2😱2
🌎 Геомагнитный шторм накроет Землю Метеозависимым белгородцам стоит приготовиться: с 23 по 25 сентября планету накроют сильные геомагнитные волнения. Пик придется на 25 сентября — активность достигнет 5 баллов, что соответствует буре уровня G1. Возможны головные боли, скачки давления, слабость и бессонница. Как переносите такие сюрпризы от Солнца? 😱 — Голова раскалывается 👀 — Не реагирую, полет нормальный Белгор…
😱20❤1👍1
⚡️ Громко над Белгородом! Мониторинговые каналы сообщали о пусках в сторону Шебекино, там объявлена ракетная опасность. Следим за ситуацией, держим в курсе. Белгород C-400🚀🇷🇺
🙏5👍1
⏺⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ ⬜️ ⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ 💯 Гарантии, отзывы 👤 Конфиденциальность 💲 Низкие цены 📦 Оперативная доставка 📁 Помощь с разрешением Перейти в магазин 👇🏼 https://t.me/+Iqj84yEaJY9lZGNi Купить травмат
👎3❤1😱1
⚡️ Кандидат в Госдуму от «Яблока» уехал из России Кандидат в депутаты Госдумы от партии «Яблоко» в Белгородской области Илья Костюков покинул Россию и уехал в Грузию. По данным местных источников, это произошло ещё неделю назад. Накануне Костюков выпустил видео с жёсткой критикой врио губернатора Вячеслава Шуваева. Подписчики попросили его быть осторожнее с высказываниями. Ранее политик призывал к прекращению боев…
😢15👎3🔥2🤬2🤯2
📚 Школьникам добавят ещё 142 часа учёбы С 1 сентября 2027 года минимальная нагрузка для 10–11 классов вырастет до 2312 часов вместо нынешних 2170. Об этом сообщает ТАСС. Изменения вводят вместе с новым ФГОС: программы по математике, физике, химии и биологии пересмотрят в сторону практических задач. А вы как думаете, это пойдёт на пользу или просто добавит нагрузки? 💯 — Определённо есть толк 🤡 — Ещё больше учёбы, к…
👎36😱6❤4💯1🤬1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 424 posts we hold for @belgorodc400. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@abknlive · 86 posts🚧ДТП АРХАНГЕЛЬСКА🚧
@arhangelsklive · 146 postsAstrakhan.live Лайк
@Astrakhanlive · 96 postsБарнаул лайв
@barnaullive · 1086 postsИркутск live
@irkutsklive · 256 postsКалининград | все обо всем 🌆
@kaliningradLive · 626 postsKazan
@kazanlive · 186 postsКУРСК (БЕЗ ОПОВЕЩЕНИЙ) Школьная жизнь
@kurskLIVE · 406 postsЛипецк LIVE
@lipetsklive · 1,4916 postsМагнитогорск лайв
@magnitogorsklive · 86 postsНижний Новгород лайв
@nizhnynovlive · 236 postsНовоалтайск Live ДТП и ЧС
@novoaltaisklive · 186 postsНВКЗ
@novokuznetsklive · 106 postsНОВОРОССИЯ
@novorussialive · 286 postsNskLive
@NovosibirskLIVE · 146 postsПермь LIVE
@permlive · 106 postsПетрозаводск Live
@petrozavodsklive · 2576 postsАндрей Савельев
@razvitie · 7286 postsSAHALIN LIVE
@SAHALINLIVE · 106 postsПыльный Сратов
@saratovlive · 2,0976 postsСтаврополь LIVE
@Stavropollive · 596 postsTonPlay
@tonplay · 720,7875 postsGreen VPN 🌿
@greenvpn_rbot · 87,5512 postsUNSTOP VPN
@unstop_vpn_bot · 20,7782 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 40
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 40
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@belgorodc400 named 40 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@radarb31 · 138,436#1
@zhest_belgorod · 591,426#2
@grohot_pgr · 2#3
@vvgladkov · 414,183#4
@belgorod01 · 191,357#5
@bletgorod · 106,427#6
@belgorodecRU · 92,521#7
@belplus_bg · 71,230#8
@zhest_shebekino_channel · 61,110#9
@vzrivi_belgorod1 · 34,375#10
@prigranichie_radar1 · 32,427#11
@undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,756#12
@lpr1_Belgorod_alarm · 57,501#13
@bbbelgorod · 49,116#14
@zalpom31_2 · 69,146#15
@mfoto31 · 45,952#16
@belgorod_live1 · 13,696#17
@belgorodchina31 · 6,779#18
@club_shebekino · 48,980#19
@Sho_Shebekino · 31,234#20
@pravda_belgorod · 7,533#21
@grp_sever · 34,105#22
@Rschs_prigranichie1 · 34,520#23
@chp_bel · 63,669#24
@bel31online · 46,004#25
@avto_belgorod31 · 25,583#26
@belgorod_sirena31 · 13,007#27
@incbgd · 9,448#28
@belgorod_best31 · 7,671#29
@love_shbk · 9,040#30
@krasnaya_yaruga31 · 29,942#31
@elite_belgorod_31 · 32,819#32
@belgorod_go31 · 35,239#33
@rschs_prigranichie · 28,170#34
@belpravda31 · 15,865#35
@IABelRu · 34,532#36
@opersvodki_belgorod · 18,737#37
@fonartv · 26,787#38
@ZOV_granicy · 9,231#39
@radarnebo_bpla · 15,880#40
@onlain31 · 5,476#41
@st_oskol_news · 10,293#42
@rachsbelgorod · 6,633#43
@rschs31 · 16,694#44
@channelbel · 7,340#45
@belgorod_granica · 182,787#46
@bel_podrobnosti · 7,129#47
@rchs_belgorod · 9,892#48
@belpepel · 167,154#49
@belgorod_vkurse24 · 19,991 (as read 25 August 2026)#50
@openbelgorod · 5,769#51
@yaruga31 · 35,979#52
@operativno31 · 15,197#53
@steelmalikov · 13,989#54
@stroitel_online_31 · 26,843#55
@belgorodziza · 7,981#56
@bgdoblast31 · 2,817#57
@belnews_belgorod · 16,857#58
@pograni4nik_iz_ada · 104,972#59
@notes_veterans · 276,927#60
@dva_majors · 1,168,837#61
@kozacha23 · 39,722#62
@zhest_kursk_146 · 92,206#63
@yurasumy · 2,672,095#64
@novosti_efir · 3,956,254#65
@readovkanews · 2,012,262#66
@Z13_Separ · 212,772#67
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,285#68
@gubernator_46 · 183,486#69
@rezervsvo · 205,638#70
@huyovy_kharkiv · 465,748#71
@rodnaya_sudzha · 72,151#72
@tipich_kursk · 151,420#73
@belgorod01people · 38,591#74
@kurskbomond · 226,708#75
@belarusian_silovik · 453,479#76
@control_sigma · 31,775#77
@vysokygovorit · 488,324#78
@epoddubny · 575,703#79
@Stasfeisiia · 6,051#80
@tokov · 3,207#81
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,202#82
@XNRRussia · 25,274#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@belgorod_granica · 182,787
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@radarb31 · 138,436
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@vzrivi_belgorod1 · 34,375
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
@r31belgorod · 31,467
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@grp_sever · 34,105
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
@chp_bel · 63,669
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
@grohot_pgr · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@avto_belgorod31 · 25,583
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
@undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,756
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
@bel31online · 46,004
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
@belgorod_smi · 63,588
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
@belgorodecRU · 92,521
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
@bbbelgorod · 49,116
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@belgorod_informant · 22,532
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
@krasnaya_yaruga31 · 29,942
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 7 September 2026
@Sho_Shebekino · 31,234
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
@belgorod_tg · 39,500
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@mfoto31 · 45,952
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
@club_shebekino · 48,980
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
@bletgorod · 106,427
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@rschs_prigranichie · 28,170
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@elite_belgorod_31 · 32,819
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@zhest_shebekino_channel · 61,110
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
@zalpom31_2 · 69,146
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белгород С-400🚀🇷🇺” (@belgorodc400), 49,567 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belgorodc400.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.