Posted without readable text

Channel
ЧП Белгород
@chp_bel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,481subscribers
-350 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001351170357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chp_bel |
| Description | Предложить новость: @Chp31bot Новостной портал Белгорода и области Реклама: @Engage_suBot, @Olha605 Мы в ВК - https://vk.com/bel_obl_chp |
| Created | 26 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chp_bel |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 63,481 | -84 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 63,565 | -104 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 63,669 | -7 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 63,676 | +36 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 63,640 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 63,645 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 63,665 | -16 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 63,681 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 63,692 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 63,688 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 63,689 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:07 | 63,698 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 63,709 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 63,713 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 63,726 | +18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 63,708 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 63,731 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 63,743 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 63,755 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 63,775 | first reading |
Engagement
458 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.72%
- avg views ÷ 63,481 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,730
- 220 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.306%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 220
- of 458 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 215 of 220 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 458 (5 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 380,082 |
| Reactions total | 1,153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 16:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,000
- Videos
- ≈6,450
- Links
- ≈12,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 13m 38s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,485 reactions across 450 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 941 | 37.9% | |
| 👍 | 518 | 20.8% | |
| 🤬 | 459 | 18.5% | |
| 😢 | 186 | 7.48% | |
| 🙏 | 157 | 6.32% | |
| 🤯 | 148 | 5.96% | |
| 😱 | 68 | 2.74% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 0.322% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 450 of the 458 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 458 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 12.4%
- 57 of 458 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 57
- posts carrying an erid · 50 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,070
- over 57 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,870
- over 401 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwPNH23 | 4 | 18 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqufxpHq | 2 | 3 September 2026 | 4 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvwcEEg | 2 | 15 September 2026 | 16 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqw2AEkU | 2 | 20 September 2026 | 21 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqxXeoFy | 2 | 9 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2VtzquZkiDr | 1 | 24 September 2026 | 24 September 2026 |
| 2VtzquyYp2x | 1 | 12 September 2026 | 12 September 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv5aXEs | 1 | 24 August 2026 | 24 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv74Dvz | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqv8WpPu | 1 | 23 August 2026 | 23 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvFrg8k | 1 | 13 September 2026 | 13 September 2026 |
| 2VtzqvHSosG | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 38 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 458 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
В селе Хорошилово Старооскольского округа мотоциклист врезался в столб, есть погибшая. Авария произошла 5 октября около 3:15 ночи. 30-летний водитель мотоцикла не справился с управлением и допустил наезд на опору освещения. В результате столкновения 26-летняя пассажирка скончалась на месте происшествия. Водитель получил травмы. Фото: ДПС 31 Старый Оскол Подписаться | Написать нам
Сотрудники ЕТК остались без аванса за вторую половину сентября. Задержка выплат коснулась всего штата крупнейшего пассажирского перевозчика Белгородской агломерации. По внутреннему графику деньги должны были прийти 15-го числа. В руководстве компании подтвердили факт задержки и объяснили ситуацию нехваткой средств. Причиной стала задержка оплаты по госконтрактам со стороны регионального «Организатора пассажирских п…
🤬6❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Отопительный сезон в Белгороде начнется позже, чем в предыдущие три года. Мэр Валентин Демидов назвал предварительные даты: социальные объекты начнут подключать с 12 октября, а многоквартирные дома — с 15 октября. Для сравнения: в прошлом году тепло в дома дали 6 октября, в 2024 году — 14 октября, а в 2023 — 11 октября. При этом по нормативам отопление должны включать не позднее дня, следующего за пятью сутками, ког…
❤1
Белгородская область получит списание почти 3 миллиардов рублей долга перед федеральным центром. Соответствующее решение озвучил председатель правительства России Михаил Мишустин на совещании с вице-премьерами. Освободившиеся средства направят на поддержку участников специальной военной операции и их семей. Всего федеральная программа позволяет регионам списать две трети накопленных бюджетных обязательств. Ранее об…
❤2👍1
На улице Октябрьской 3 октября в результате атаки беспилотника погибла 30-летняя Алла Маркова. В момент удара женщина вышла во двор вместе с мужем, чтобы покормить бездомную кошку. От полученных ранений Алла скончалась на месте, ее супруг был госпитализирован в реанимацию. Мать погибшей Галина Маркова-Литвинова рассказала, что дочь получила травмы, несовместимые с жизнью, в тот момент, когда пыталась помочь животно…
😢41🙏5❤1🤯1
В Старооскольском округе под нужды Стойленского ГОКа планируют перевести 193,5 гектара сельскохозяйственных земель. Это площадь, сопоставимая с 271 футбольным полем. Соответствующий законопроект уже внесен в Белгородскую облдуму. Речь идет о переводе 12 участков в категорию земель промышленности и иного специального назначения. Документы поступили на рассмотрение 24 августа. Окончательное решение по этому вопросу д…
❤1👍1
Жители Белгорода в соцсетях обращаются к властям с просьбой начать подачу тепла в многоквартирные дома. Горожане отмечают, что с приходом октябрьских холодов температура в помещениях заметно снизилась. Ранее мэр Валентин Демидов заявлял, что старт отопительного сезона будет зависеть от погодных условий. При этом в городской администрации отчитывались о полной технической готовности коммунальных служб к запуску систе…
🤬17❤2😱1
Сколько раз за неделю вы откладывали что-то «на потом»? Собрать альбом, оформить открытку, придумать подарок, написать поздравление, сделать приглашение. Раньше на это уходили вечера. Теперь достаточно просто описать, что нужно. Сервис, который напишет текст, сделает картинку, подскажет идею и поможет с рутиной — всё в одном месте. Без фотошопа и сложных программ. Вы описываете задачу — получаете готовый результат…
❤3
В Масловой Пристани Шебекинского округа в результате атаки FPV-дрона погиб водитель грузового автомобиля. Мужчина получил травмы, несовместимые с жизнью, и скончался на месте происшествия. В Грайвороне под удар попал еще один автомобиль. Мужчина госпитализирован с осколочными ранениями головы, кисти и ног. Сейчас пострадавшему оказывают помощь в местной ЦРБ, после чего его переведут в белгородскую горбольницу №2. П…
❤6😢3
В Белгороде скончалась женщина, получившая тяжелые ранения при атаке беспилотников на многоквартирный дом. Она находилась в больнице после удара БПЛА, но спасти ее не удалось. Всего в ходе атаки пострадали еще семь человек, в том числе трое детей. Врачи продолжают оказывать помощь раненым, двое из них, включая 16-летнего подростка, остаются в тяжелом состоянии. Город атаковали шесть дронов, один из них был сбит. В …
🙏16😢6😱4🤯3👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 458 posts we hold for @chp_bel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@chp_bel edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 18 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zhest_belgorod · 589,859#1
@vvgladkov · 407,361#2
@radarb31 · 138,151#3
@belgorod01 · 190,618#4
@bletgorod · 106,202#5
@belplus_bg · 70,904#6
@belgorodc400 · 49,395#7
@belgorodecRU · 92,246#8
@grohot_pgr · 24#9
@bbbelgorod · 49,001#10
@undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,684#11
@zhest_shebekino_channel · 60,988#12
@vzrivi_belgorod1 · 34,335#13
@bel31online · 45,712#14
@mfoto31 · 46,228#15
@avto_belgorod31 · 25,580#16
@zalpom31_2 · 68,749#17
@okoskol · 70,365#18
@kozacha23 · 39,639#19
@fonartv · 26,837#20
@Sho_Shebekino · 31,260#21
@club_shebekino · 48,891#22
@chp_st_oskol · 28,751#23
@IABelRu · 34,423#24
@opersvodki_belgorod · 18,684#25
@belgorodchina31 · 6,752#26
@prigranichie_radar1 · 32,293#27
@rschs_prigranichie · 28,088#28
@krasnaya_yaruga31 · 29,852#29
@belgorod_go31 · 35,097#30
@rchs_belgorod · 9,855#31
@belpepel · 167,635#32
@bel_podrobnosti · 7,138#33
@sta_oskol · 84,693#34
@channelbel · 7,320#35
@glaZ_graniZa · 20,779#36
@openbelgorod · 5,764#37
@zhest_kursk_146 · 91,881#38
@operativno31 · 15,212#39
@elite_belgorod_31 · 32,595#40
@belpravda31 · 15,816#41
@steelmalikov · 13,960#42
@belgorod_sirena31 · 12,992#43
@belnews_belgorod · 16,803#44
@grp_sever · 34,008#45
@belgorod_live1 · 13,640#46
@tgvaluyki · 30,615#47
@Z13_Separ · 211,155#48
@belgorod_vkurse24 · 20,004 (as read 21 August 2026)#49
@beladm31 · 6,791#50
@valuyki31 · 6,560#51
@belgorod_best31 · 7,661#52
@Rschs_prigranichie1 · 34,392#53
@ZOV_granicy · 9,261#54
@epoddubny · 573,236#55
@incbgd · 9,423#56
@mchs31 · 18,574#57
@rschs31 · 16,616#58
@mirbelogorya · 12,190#59
@belpressa · 2,894#60
@belgorodmedia24 · 4,291#61
@yaruga31 · 35,891#62
@belregion_ru · 4,580#63
@graivoron_okrug · 5,357#64
@valuykitg · 9,847#65
@bondarev_gennadi · 1,763#66
@onlain31 · 5,475#67
@pulsegrayvorona · 11,046#68
@belgorod_informant · 22,427#69
@chpbelgorod · 35,970#70
@oskol_stelit_31 · 28,774#71
@beltrue · 2,772#72
@bel_lemon · 2,800#73
@notes_veterans · 275,838#74
@yurasumy · 2,681,490#75
@readovkanews · 2,008,496#76
@belgorod01people · 38,516#77
@novosti_efir · 3,951,474#78
@shot_shot · 1,268,483#79
@rvvoenkor · 1,466,282#80
@vysokygovorit · 490,528#81
@huyovy_kharkiv · 464,989#82
@tokov · 3,207#83
@urazovo · 9,642#84
@korocha_iz · 9,112#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@r31belgorod · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@belgorod_life · 27,843
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
@chp_st_oskol · 28,751
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 9 September 2026
@belgorod_informant · 22,427
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
@oskol_stelit_31 · 28,774
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 9 September 2026
@tgvaluyki · 30,615
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
@undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,684
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
@bel31online · 45,712
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
@valyikizoov · 19,748
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 30 September 2026
@avto_belgorod31 · 25,580
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
@okoskol · 70,365
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 20 August 2026
@belgorod_tg · 39,201
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@belpepel · 167,635
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@elite_belgorod_31 · 32,595
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@bbbelgorod · 49,001
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@belplus_bg · 70,904
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
@bletgorod · 106,202
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@rschs_prigranichie · 28,088
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@vzrivi_belgorod1 · 34,335
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
@radarb31 · 138,151
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@belgorod01 · 190,618
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Sho_Shebekino · 31,260
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
@belgorod_smi · 63,427
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
@belgorpost · 61,073
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧП Белгород” (@chp_bel), 63,481 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chp_bel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.