Предложить новость: @Bletgorod2bot
По поводу рекламы: @belgorod_ads
✅ Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6891e0fc153f4e05119d4a25
Купить рекламу через биржу: https://telega.in/c/bletgorod
Created
7 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net +1,253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105,134–106,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 07:39
106,597
-8
3 Sept 2026, 12:57
106,605
+1
2 Sept 2026, 06:58
106,604
+17
1 Sept 2026, 06:56
106,587
-3
31 Aug 2026, 08:16
106,590
+131
30 Aug 2026, 08:42
106,459
-12
29 Aug 2026, 05:43
106,471
-20
28 Aug 2026, 07:45
106,491
-11
27 Aug 2026, 09:58
106,502
-29
26 Aug 2026, 06:54
106,531
-4
24 Aug 2026, 01:55
106,535
-19
22 Aug 2026, 11:27
106,554
+30
21 Aug 2026, 02:12
106,524
-33
19 Aug 2026, 22:48
106,557
+6
18 Aug 2026, 21:35
106,551
-8
17 Aug 2026, 21:37
106,559
-7
15 Aug 2026, 17:16
106,566
-5
14 Aug 2026, 08:28
106,571
+1
13 Aug 2026, 01:25
106,570
+4
11 Aug 2026, 23:57
106,566
first reading
Engagement
314 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 106,597 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,300
288 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.413%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
288
of 314 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
314 (5 August 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
5,282,040
Reactions total
21,792
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 04:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,400
Videos
≈5,370
Links
≈3,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54m 01s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,412 reactions across 304 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5355163321429400695
16,535
73.8%
❤🔥
5,877
26.2%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 314 of the 314 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,970 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.46%
14 of 314 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
14
posts carrying an erid · 11 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
15,100
over 14 measured posts
Median views · rest
17,800
over 300 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxXWm9R
4
14 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzquxNwcZ
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
2VtzqvJasLs
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2VtzqvQcqEb
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2VtzqvUq2Qx
1
5 September 2026
5 September 2026
2VtzqwqwKmq
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2VtzqwtT3Rn
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2Vtzqx1mQ2m
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqxZY6kv
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2Vtzqxh214o
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
2VtzqxiDXg5
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Один человек погиб и один пострадал при ударе дрона по машине в Октябрьском Белгородского округа, — Оперштаб.
Женщина скончалась на месте от полученных ранений, мужчина получил закрытую черепно-мозговую травму.
@bletgorod
Взаимный режим прекращения огня вступит в силу в 00:00 6 сентября и будет распространяться только на Киев и Москву, а также на «места, задействованные в переговорном процессе».
Официальные заявления были сделаны Песковым и Зеленским. Временное перемирие продлится трое суток.
@bletgorod
Подписчики пишут, что на Ozon снова нельзя выбрать белгородские ПВЗ для заказа 😢
Напомним, возможность заказывать товары в Белгородскую область вернулась только вчера после ограничения, которое действовало с 30 августа из-за удара дрона по складу маркетплейса.
Ozon повторную отмену пока никак не комментировал.
Написать нам: @Bletgorod2bot
ПингВин становится мощнее!
Мы открыли ещё одну кибер-арену в самом центре Белгорода — на 50-летия Белгородской области, 12Б.
Ещё мощнее компьютеры, видеокарты 50-й серии и максимум производительности для тех, кому важна каждая секунда.
Но и это ещё не всё.
Совсем скоро здесь откроется абсолютно новая зона — такой ещё нет ни в одном клубе нашей сети.
Что именно мы готовим? Пока оставим в секрете.
📞 Бронь столов и …
В Оперштабе подтвердили атаку дрона на администрацию в Шебекино — загорелось одно из помещений, выбиты окна.
Также в городе при другой атаке загорелось оборудование предприятия. В Вознесеновке в результате удара БПЛА по машине погиб мужчина.
При этом с 00:00 5 сентября власти Украины объявили режим прекращения огня — сегодня в Москву для прилетели американские переговорщики Уиткофф и Кушнер. Режим должен был продей…
❗️В Белгороде заработал Ozon, заказы снова доступны — редакция «Блэтгорода» проверила и убедилась, что заказы принимаются к доставке в регион. Уведомление на скрине выше также пропало.
Напомним, 30 августа склад Ozon попал под удар, погибли трое человек, ещё 15 пострадали. В тот же день маркетплейс временно ограничил заказы — повесил уведомление и сделал выбор ПВЗ в Белгородской области недоступным.
Сейчас снова мо…
В Старом Осколе впервые с начала СВО отменили праздничные мероприятия ко Дню города.
В администрации округа заявили, что такое решение они приняли «в знак солидарности с жителями приграничья нашего региона». В городе к празднику пройдут только культурные мероприятия по проекту «Оскольские сезоны».
При этом ранее в Старом Осколе не отменяли праздничные мероприятия из-за обстановки. Туда даже переносили крупные событ…
Вы вероятно ошибаетесь на счет цвета своих глаз 🧿
Десятки оттенков, линии, родинки, переходы и рисунок, которые делают ваши глаза непохожими на другие можно различить в студии фото радужки глаз Зеница.
Можно прийти одному — сохранить свой уникальный рисунок. Можно вдвоём, всей семьей или даже вместе с питомцем — и собрать несколько радужек в одну композицию.
Результат оставить фотографией на бумаге, перенести на х…
Так выглядит здание музыкального колледжа, повреждённое после атаки беспилотников 9 августа.
По словам студентов, стёкла к 1 сентября не восстановили — в некоторых аудиториях они просто обтянуты плёнкой.
О сроках ремонта музыкального колледжа власти ничего не сообщали.
@bletgorod
custom 535516332142940069558❤🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @bletgorod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bletgorod edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Белгород — Молния @bbbelgorod · 49,176 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Пепел ➜ Белгород @belpepel · 167,040 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Белгород №1 @belgorod01 · 191,783 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Жесть Белгород @zhest_belgorod · 592,930 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 August 2026
Белгородский Андеграунд @undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,814 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Бел.Ру | Новости Белгорода @IABelRu · 34,579 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
БелПлюс @belplus_bg · 71,486 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Радар Белгород @radarb31 · 138,624 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Настоящий Гладков @vvgladkov · 419,681 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Go31 | Новости Белгорода @belgorod_go31 · 35,335 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Белгород @belgorod_tg · 39,762 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
ЧП Белгород @chp_bel · 63,692 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
СВО 2024 @zalpom31_2 · 69,401 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
БЕЛГОРОДЕЦ @belgorodecRU · 92,616 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026
Белгород С-400🚀🇷🇺 @belgorodc400 · 49,624 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
Новости Белгорода и Области @belgorod_smi · 63,798 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
Элитный Белгород @elite_belgorod_31 · 32,996 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
Красная Яруга🇷🇺Ракитное Приграничье @yaruga31 · 36,075 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 2 September 2026
31 Онлайн @bel31online · 46,216 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Взрывы Белгород🇷🇺 @vzrivi_belgorod1 · 34,409 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
ШÖ ❓ Шебекино @Sho_Shebekino · 31,245 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Просто Михаил Шебекино 📸 @mfoto31 · 45,891 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
Шёпот Шебекино @club_shebekino · 48,965 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
Жесть Шебекино @zhest_shebekino_channel · 61,200 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блэтгород” (@bletgorod), 106,597 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bletgorod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.