Channel
@borhancheque
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,200subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001009714190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borhancheque |
| Created | Between 1 October 2015 and 31 January 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borhancheque |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @borhanmaliyat/197514 Sept 2025, 16:14 UTC | @borhancheque/1884 · this entry14 Sept 2025, 16:15 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @borhancheque/1886 · this entry25 Sept 2025, 05:55 UTC | @borhanmaliyat/197725 Sept 2025, 05:55 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @borhancheque/1887 · this entry3 Oct 2025, 16:20 UTC | @borhanmaliyat/19783 Oct 2025, 16:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @borhancheque/1891 · this entry29 Oct 2025, 07:16 UTC | @borhanmaliyat/198129 Oct 2025, 07:16 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @borhancheque/1895 · this entry10 Dec 2025, 11:21 UTC | @borhanmaliyat/198310 Dec 2025, 11:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @animoshaver/144714 Sept 2025, 16:15 UTC | @borhancheque/1884 · this entry14 Sept 2025, 16:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @borhanmaliyat | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @borhanmaliyat (5–4) |
| @animoshaver | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–1) |
| @borhanpeyman | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @borhancheque — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 1,200 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 1,198 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 1,200 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,199 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 1,200 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,201 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 1,201 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
اعسار سهامدار شرکت سهامی 1⃣ سهامدار بودن در شرکتهای سهامی خاص و سهامی عام بخودی خود ، دلیل بر تاجر بودن سهامدار و یا دلیل بر توانمندی و تمکن مالی سهامدار برای پرداخت دیون و تعهدات شخصی اش (ملائت و دارندگی مالی) نیست. 2⃣ به صرف اینکه سهامدار شرکت سهامی خاص یا شرکت سهامی عام هستید تاجر شناخته نمیشوید. ✅ بنابراین ؛ اگر سهامدار شرکتهای سهامی خاص و عام درباره پرداخت بدهی شخصی یا پرداخت هزینه دادرسی مربوط به پرونده ش…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
پیامد دریافت چکی که در سامانه صیاد ثبت نشده!؟ از دیدگاه قانون جدید صدور چک ، اگر برگه چکهای صیادی بدون درج و تأیید در سامانه صیاد ، صادر شوند چک شناخته نمیشوند و مزایای قانونی که برای چک در نظر گرفته شده را نخواهند داشت. شخصی که برگه چکهای صیادی را بدون ثبت آنها در سامانه صیاد دریافت کرده عملاً خود را از مزایای قانونی چک محروم کرده است و حتی نمیتواند از طریق دادگاه ، الزام صادرکننده چک به ثبت چک در سامانه صیاد…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
مالیات بر خودروهای گرانقیمت(لوکس) در سال ۱۴۰۵ در قانون بودجه سال ۱۴۰۵ که هماکنون در مجلس شورای اسلامی در حال بررسی و رسیدگی میباشد پیشبینی شده است که نرخ مالیات بر انواع خودروی سواری و وانت دواتاق (دوکابین) گرانقیمت که دارای شماره انتظامی شخصی هستند مازاد بر مبلغ هفت و نیم میلیارد تومان ، برابر با یک درصد ارزش خودرو باشد. ♦️ مرکز دفاع از حقوق مالیاتی کسبوکارهای ایران (ساوایران) تماس برای هماهنگی و رزرو نوبت…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
یلدایتان خجسته دلتان شاد کسبوکارتان پر رونق www.animoshaver.ir
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
صلاحیت مدیرعامل برای طرح دعوا از سوی شرکت برابر قانون تجارت ، مقررات آیین دادرسی و اساسنامه اغلب شرکتها ، مدیرعامل شرکت بدون تصویب هیات مدیره ، نمیتواند اقدام به انتخاب وکیل یا طرح و دفاع از دعاوی مرتبط با شرکت در مراجع قضایی نماید. بنابراین ، لازم است مدیرانعامل شرکتها پیش از اقدام برای طرح یا دفاع از دعاوی شرکت ، مصوبه هیات مدیره شرکت خود درباره اعطای اختیار به مدیرعامل برای انتخاب وکیل و طرح و دفاع از دعوا را…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
دعوای بازگردان (استرداد) لاشه سفته اگر مبلغ سفته به دارنده سفته پرداخت شده ولی لاشه آن همچنان نزد دارنده سفته باقی مانده باشد صادرکننده سفته میتواند دعوای استرداد لاشه سفته را مطرح کند زیرا به تعهد خود عمل کرده است. صادرکننده سفته پس از انجام تعهد و پرداخت بدهی موضوع سفته ، حق دارد سفته را پس بگیرد تا از استفاده مجدد سفته بهعنوان سند بدهی جلوگیری نماید. ❇️ در صورت عدم استرداد سفته، امکان سوءاستفاده از آن وجود دا…
Signed گروه حقوقی برهان
اجرای حکم محکومیت مالی علیه شرکت منحله یا شرکت ورشکستهای که عملیات تصفیه آن به پایان رسیده؟! درباره شرکت ورشکسته یا منحلهای که عملیات تصفیه آن به پایان رسیده است و مالی از آن شرکت باقی نمانده، دادبرده یا بستانکار ، در مطالبه طلب خود فقط به میزان مبلغ اسمی سهام یا سهم الشرکه سهامداران و شرکا حق رجوع به آنان را دارند. بنابراین در معامله با شرکتها اولاً دقت کنید که شرکت به اندازه کافی ، خوشنام و دارای اعتبار و امو…
Signed گروه حقوقی برهان
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
پایان مدت عضویت در هیأت مدیره شرکتها برابر ماده ۱۳۶ لایحه قانونی اصلاح قسمتی از قانون تجارت در وضعیتی که مدت ۲ ساله عضویت در هیات مدیره شرکت سهامی به پایان میرسد تا زمان انتخاب اعضای هیئت مدیره جدید ، هیات مدیره سابق ، کماکان برای اداره امور شرکت سهامی مسئولیت خواهند داشت. بنابراین اقدامات ، تصمیمات و دادوستدهای شرکت سهامی که از طریق هیأت مدیره کنونی با رعایت قوانین کشور و همچنین با رعایت اساسنامه شرکت سهامی انج…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
دعوای بازگردان (استرداد) لاشه سفته اگر مبلغ سفته به دارنده سفته پرداخت شده ولی لاشه آن همچنان نزد دارنده سفته باقی مانده باشد صادرکننده سفته میتواند دعوای استرداد لاشه سفته را مطرح کند زیرا به تعهد خود عمل کرده است. صادرکننده سفته پس از انجام تعهد و پرداخت بدهی موضوع سفته ، حق دارد سفته را پس بگیرد تا از استفاده مجدد سفته بهعنوان سند بدهی جلوگیری نماید. ❇️ در صورت عدم استرداد سفته، امکان سوءاستفاده از آن وجود دا…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
الزام به ثبت چک در سامانه صیاد ؟! ❗️ اگر تصور میکنید که عدم ثبت چک در سامانه صیاد ، مسأله چندان مهمی نیست بدلایل زیر سخت در اشتباه هستید!! ۱- چکی که در سامانه صیاد ثبت نشود هیچگونه امتیازات و حمایتهای بانکی ، قضایی و قانونی به عنوان چک را نخواهد داشت. ۲- اگر چکی که در سامانه صیاد ثبت نشده است را بگیرید نخواهید توانست صادرکننده چک را از طریق دادگاه ، ملزم به ثبت چک در سامانه صیاد کنید زیرا 👇 دیوان عالی کشور در …
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
دعوای ابطال چک دعوای ابطال چک ، یک دعوای غیرمالی است و مستلزم واریز هزینه دادرسی به اندازه یک دعوای مالی نمیباشد. زیرا دعوای ابطال چک در حقیقت ، دعوا برای ابطال سندی است که بر خلاف مقررات قانون چک و قانون تجارت ، تنظیم شده و نتیجه مالی مستقیم برای خواهان ندارد. (برگرفته از نظرات مشورتی اداره حقوقی قوه قضاییه) 💎 وکالت تخصصی دعاوی چک 💎 مشاوره حقوقی تخصصی چک ☎️ تماس برای هماهنگی و رزرو نوبت مشاوره ☎️ 02188323…
Signed صادق رئیسی کیا
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @borhancheque. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانستنیهای چک” (@borhancheque), 1,200 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borhancheque.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.