Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -227. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,943–21,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:17
20,997
-5
17 Sept 2026, 06:55
21,002
-10
15 Sept 2026, 09:15
21,012
-16
13 Sept 2026, 20:59
21,028
-2
12 Sept 2026, 05:16
21,030
+23
10 Sept 2026, 01:40
21,007
+27
6 Sept 2026, 18:16
20,980
-13
4 Sept 2026, 04:58
20,993
-7
2 Sept 2026, 20:38
21,000
-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:45
21,002
-16
31 Aug 2026, 15:48
21,018
-9
30 Aug 2026, 17:26
21,027
-22
29 Aug 2026, 16:13
21,049
-9
28 Aug 2026, 12:52
21,058
-13
27 Aug 2026, 13:34
21,071
-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:23
21,072
-6
25 Aug 2026, 10:12
21,078
-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:24
21,080
-12
22 Aug 2026, 23:54
21,092
-28
21 Aug 2026, 12:24
21,120
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 20,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,150
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
20 (17 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
12,590
Reactions total
313
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 17:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 12s
Average length
1m 18s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,252 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,490
66.2%
💋
255
11.3%
💅
205
9.10%
🍓
169
7.50%
💘
133
5.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @callmegelik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вот и уходовая косметика подъехала. Обещала же совмещать обзоры на декоративку и уход, поэтому Hollyshop отправили мне небольшое пополнение запасов.
Тут куча всего для волос — очень давно хочу ещё и про уход за волосами начать рассказывать, так что постепенно двигаемся и в эту сторону. От популярного корейского mise en scene приехали кондиционер, несмываемый крем и сыворотка. Ещё шампунь для волос от moev и бальзам …
Сегодня пришлось знатно побегать по всем магнитам моего и соседнего района, чтобы урвать этот бронзер Stellary. Сделала заказ на самовывоз в одном магазине — позвонили, сказали, что у них его нет
Начала искать в других. УРВАЛА ПОСЛЕДНИЙ, даже специально к полке подошла, чтобы проверить. Стоят только румяна из этой же коллекции будто бы никому ненужные.. Прям фулл полки ими забиты. Забрали везде именно бронзер. Меня,…
Ну прям жесть какая-то, знаете ли, а не термотушь от Relouis
Попробовала я её впервые, ну, может, месяц назад. Смотрю, жидкая, как чёрт. Наносить невозможно, все вокруг глаз в этой туши. Окей, думаю, пусть полежит и высохнет — гляди может так все наладится. У меня так было с термотушью Vivienne Sabo Grand Noire. Я её сначала отбросила в дальний ящик с громким «фи», а потом она стала одной из любимых. А эта? Ни-ху-я
…
Я в последнее время прям совсем увлеклась темой макияжа. Сначала поставила запятую и написала «простите», а теперь думаю: а за что, собственно? Знаю-знаю, что многие подписаны (или были, хех) за мои обзоры на уходовые банки, но зарывать свою тягу к мейку я не буду. Постов про декоративную косметику сейчас сильно больше, это правда
Тем более, что со временем я уже не могу тестировать настолько большой объем уходовой …
Мои любимые тонеры прямо сейчас💧
Не секрет, что я в последнее время почти полностью перешла на тонеры именно в формате спрея. Это колоссально экономит время. Попробовав мист однажды, потом либо не захочется возвращаться к тонерам в классическом понимании, либо всех любимчиков будете переливать во флакон с распылителем. Инфа сотка
ТОП-1. Vt Cosmetics PDRN Glow Ampoule. Пусть производитель и назвал это сывороткой, дл…
Скупила я как-то одним днем все термостойкие туши на обзор, которые мне попались на просторах маркетплейса. Че там только нет, но сейчас пищу больше всего от этой и еще парочки
В двух словах: тушь невероятно удлиняет (настолько, что не верится, что это мои ресницы), идеально смывается чулочками без черных кругов, не отпечатываться в течение дня на веке и не осыпается. Все остальное — на видео в посте.
Попробовала я…
Мои любимые помады в стиле бимбо/milky lips. Те самые, о которых спрашивают тыщу раз на дню. Моя влажная мечта, чтобы такое видео залетело на огромные просмотры и я просто бахнула его в закреп. А то скоро придется на лоб себе приклеить 😀
Firin 938 (любимочки, вот если вам реально понравилась эта помада в обзоре — берите, пока дают. Если зайдете в вопросы к товару, афигеете, сколько раз спрашивали именно про 938 отте…
Не знаю как вы, а я жоска недооценивала силу Авито в плане косметики. И это не кринж
Особенно, когда ты бьюти-блогер и покупаешь косметику на обзоры ну почти постоянно, успеть за всем просто нереально, использовать всё — тоже нереально. Я прекрасно понимаю, что почти любая косметика, какой бы клёвой она ни была, всё равно будет лежать на полке и пылиться. Тогда за какой хуй мне платить за новые румяна 3к, когда я мо…
Продукты, которые были использованы для макияжа глаз:
Консилер Catrice
Палетка Love Generation
Палетка Relouis
Палетка Beauty Bomb
Каял Vivienne Sabo
Однушка-сияшка Art-Visage
Тушь RAD синяя
Губы:
Карандаш Golden Rose
Помада Essence caring
SHINE vegan collagen 206
Перламутровая помада Nice View
Если полезно, то буду рада 🤍
❤65💘16💋11💅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @callmegelik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
делиса косметикс @imdelisa · 35,840 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
lettres d’elina @lettreselina · 41,806 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
ангел хлоя @angchloeme · 61,001 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 August 2026
Эмили @lokerm · 34,239 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
hey, it’s me Anya @heyitsmeanya · 77,603 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
ТОЛЬКО (НЕ) НА ЛИЦО @kravtz_cosmetology · 32,659 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
целую, лера @norvegianwoods · 22,327 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
ББШКА @bbvikaaa · 51,254 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 September 2026
целую, аня @kisbaes · 31,913 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
DaSHuk @ShulginaDa · 161,695 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
несоджа @nesojaa · 86,473 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
крис про сияние @krisbeautynews · 53,972 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
Imargot @immmargot · 71,775 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 August 2026
helnns @helnns · 68,574 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
Lera Salomatina @withheartValeria · 43,425 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Геля бьюти фея” (@callmegelik), 20,997 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callmegelik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.