Вот так выглядят пары ртути. Смотрим на тень.

Channel
Химики
@chemistrytg2021
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,020subscribers
-311 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001439985976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chemistrytg2021 |
| Description | Здесь собраны самые интересные опыты и эксперименты, не пытайтесь повторить самостоятельно! Реклама: @glock_seventeen, @fomin717 |
| Created | 29 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chemistrytg2021 |
Topic
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 32,020 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 32,040 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 32,052 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 32,063 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 32,070 | -20 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 32,090 | -23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 32,113 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 32,124 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 32,136 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 32,144 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 32,152 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 32,159 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 32,170 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 32,179 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 32,184 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 32,190 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 32,196 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 32,214 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 32,215 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 32,224 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈310
- Videos
- ≈2,160
- Links
- ≈141
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7m 12s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Реакция нейтрализации Черный раствор представляет собой йодкрахмальный комплекс, а прозрачный раствор содержит ионы тиосульфата. При смешивании тиосульфат восстанавливает йод до йодида, который разрушает комплекс и исчезает окраска.
Эффект Мпембы - действие кипятка на морозе Эффект Мпембы, или парадокс Мпембы — научный парадокс, который гласит, что горячая вода может замёрзнуть быстрее, чем холодная, хотя при этом она должна пройти температуру холодной воды в процессе замерзания. Данное наблюдение противоречит первому началу термодинамики. #интереснаяфизика
Самый плотный металл осмий (Os) При стандартных условиях представляет собой блестящий серебристо-белый с голубоватым отливом металл. Переходный металл, относится к платиновым металлам. Наряду с иридием обладает наибольшей плотностью среди всех простых веществ. Согласно теоретическим расчётам, его плотность даже выше, чем у иридия.
H2SO4+KI. ⠀ В результате действия концентрированного раствора серной кислоты на твердый иодид калия происходит образование соли – сульфата калия, воды, а также выделение свободного йода и газообразного сероводорода. ⠀ Йод представляет собой летучие кристаллы фиолетово-черного цвета с металлическим блеском.
Взрыв первой в мире водородной бомбы «Майк», испытания были произведены США 1 ноября 1952 года. Суть реакции заключается в синтезе легких элементов, в данном случаи изотопов водорода (дейтерия). В обычном состоянии ядра водорода напоминают что-то в виде зарядов, которые отталкиваются друг от друга, для того, чтоб они соединились и образовался новый изотоп (тритий), или новых химический элемент (гелий), нужна сумасшед…
Смесь «Пиранья» против цветка
Завораживающее спиральное кинетическое искусство #интереснаяфизика
Реакция воска с водой в макросъемке
Зажигание смеси пропана и кислорода в полиэтиленовом пакете.
Эксперимент «Химический телепорт» Возгонка, или сублимация — это процесс перехода из твердого состояния в газообразное, минуя жидкое. Этот эксперимент красив тем, что из неприметных черных крупинок йода образуется красивое фиолетовое облако, которое по мере охлаждения постепенно исчезает.
Магнит и магнитная слизь. Рецепт приготовления такой слизи достаточно прост. Растворите чайную ложку буры в небольшом количестве воды и осторожно добавляйте раствор в клей, постоянно помешивая. Секрет магнитных свойств заключается в железных опилках, вмешенных в слизь.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chemistrytg2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@chemicalexpert · 2,810#1
@ychemistry · 12,896#2
@official_anod · 2,148#3
@TheThoisoi · 45,321#4
@chemistryofmsu · 8,606#5
@chemrussia · 8,893#6
@chem_olimp_alles · 7,201#7
@Galaktikachem · 2,615#8
@ChemistryEasy · 25,167#9
@nsmag · 191,976#10
@ruschemunion · 3,395#11
@easy_biology1 · 1,750#12
@muctr_official · 9,064#13
@chemcraft · 987#14
@biochem_pro · 10,304#15
@chemberushi · 1,826#16
@very_interesno · 172,515#17
@labadorogovobrata · 4,565#18
@chemmuseum · 2,090#19
@mnv_msu · 2,010#20
@chemproms · 18,500#21
@ochewid · 55,316#22
@baze_chemistry · 660#23
@chem4you_ege · 17,069#24
@ziocras · 3,293#25
@bio_chem_easy · 5,393#26
@vhz_31 · 2,603#27
@chemflamel · 4,683#28
@chemyo1 · 8,108#29
@samorasvitia_opros · 157,214#30
@naturesciencetg · 19,608#31
@navseruk · 93,363#32
@funscience · 34,434#33
@iPumpBrain · 182,946#34
@anprsv · 656#35
@apo_chemistry · 2,326#36
@incredible_chemistry · 3,772#37
@prometallinfo · 9,967#38
@atrium_olympiads · 1#39
@voprosiponeorganike · 914 (as read 5 September 2026)#40
@ananikovlab · 4,377#41
@mendeleevinfo · 740#42
@lektorium20 · 115,168#43
@free_edu · 309,050#44
@turbo_chem · 4,620#45
@yaplakal · 422,290#46
@exploitex · 2,041,128#47
@Lepragram · 341,206#48
@pikabu · 256,113#49
@oplata_skoro_budet · 460,873#50
@NationGeographic · 325,560#51
@retra · 165,509#52
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,880#53
@media1337 · 1,152,508#54
@lifeyt · 330,253#55
@FactTG · 217#56
@dmuctruz · 1,062#57
@otsuka_bld · 160,444#58
@olegizvini · 32,999#59
@mycosmos · 131,200#60
@chemistryjokes · 696#61
@imehanik · 320,465#62
@priroda_animal · 113,063#63
@Architecture2021 · 36,122#64
@fuckingenglish · 312,495#65
@yuniy_biolog · 4,611#66
@naturestg · 7,692#67
@sosicka · 162,767#68
@kosmostime · 63,555#69
@animal_planeta · 117,755#70
@ca11_you · 141,538#71
@Nationall_Geoographic · 50,223#72
@Sandymustache · 212,050#73
@simpleartist · 59,075#74
@macters · 233,958#75
@viveconesto · 53,935#76
@daokedao · 99,140#77
@pda_4 · 88,340#78
@Black_History · 93,754#79
@Scienceg · 94,484#80
@neuroset_vidit · 128,026#81
@bio_ege_alles · 745#82
@hacks_excel · 284,136#83
@biologybooks2024 · 7,348#84
@elonmusk_ru · 60,846#85
@bzd_channel · 36,430#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ANIM3MALS · 26,863
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
@Operation_med · 27,119
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
@Nationall_Geoographic · 50,223
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@navseruk · 93,363
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
@ChemistryEasy · 25,167
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
@simpleartist · 59,075
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Химики” (@chemistrytg2021), 32,020 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemistrytg2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.