Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علوم شناختی

Channel

علوم شناختی

@cognitive_science_iran

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,063subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107635076
TypeChannel
Username@cognitive_science_iran
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cognitive_science_iran

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,9826,0636,022.56 August 2026 — 5,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,995 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,029 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,032 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,030 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,040 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,042 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,046 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,048 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,060 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,063 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,970–6,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:156,063+3
13 Sept 2026, 19:006,060+12
10 Sept 2026, 10:586,048+2
5 Sept 2026, 11:396,046+4
1 Sept 2026, 08:566,042+2
29 Aug 2026, 06:116,040+10
26 Aug 2026, 03:426,030-2
22 Aug 2026, 19:596,032+3
19 Aug 2026, 09:026,029+7
16 Aug 2026, 17:136,022+27
12 Aug 2026, 20:375,995+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:315,994+11
6 Aug 2026, 14:035,983+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:315,982no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:115,982first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4376.8%
👍1119.6%
👎11.79%
🔥11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC183 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سلسله سخنرانی‌های علوم اعصاب Prefrontal Controlof Cortical Signals سخنران: دکتر بهراد نوعدوست یکشنبه ۱ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۱۷:۰۰ لینک جلسه آنلاین: https://skyroom.online/ch/ipm-scs/semina @cognitive_science_iran

11 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC200 viewsread 12 August 2026

مغز ما چگونه بزرگ شد؟ با مصرف گوشت؟ احتمالاً خیر! داستان تکامل انسان، به‌‌خلاف تصویری که گاهی از آن ارائه می‌شود، روایتی ثابت و تمام‌شده نیست. تقریباً هر روز یافته‌های تازه باستان‌شناسی، ژنتیک و زیست‌شناسی تکاملی، بخشی از دانسته‌های پیشین ما را اصلاح می‌کنند. پژوهش تازه‌ای که در Science منتشر شده نیز از همین جنس است: مطالعه‌ای که یکی از روایت‌های نسبتاً جاافتاده درباره‌ی تکامل مغز انسان، یعنی نقش محوری گوشت‌خواری، ر

4 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC539 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @philosophyofscienceFile

قسمت سوم #پادکست فلسفه علم پیرامون دیدگاه های نانسی کارترایت درباره فلسفه ذهن. این پادکست مانند دو نمونه قبلی که سال گذشته تولید و منتشر شدند با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی تولید شده است و اشتباهات جزیی در ادای جملات و کلمات به همین دلیل می باشد که پیشاپیش به همین جهت عذرخواهی میکنیم. در تولید این پادکست تلاش شده است به دیدگاه ها و نظرات دیگر در فلسفه ذهن ارجاع داده شود اما محوریت بحث پیرامون نظرات نانسی کارترایت است که د

3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC563 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

پادکست شماره ۱۰ 👤: نوید پاشازاده موضوع: Cognition and Intelligence in Corvids: Exploring the Minds of Crows and Ravens #HNS_JournalClub #Neurohelli_Podcast @Zehnayesh @HelliResearch @HelliSchool @cognitive_science_iran

👍4

30 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC834 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @evophilosophy

هشدار زیست‌شناسان تکاملی درباره‌ی هوش مصنوعی در سال‌های اخیر، بحث درباره‌ی خطرهای هوش مصنوعی عمدتاً حول محور افزایش توانایی‌های شناختی آن شکل گرفته است: اینکه آیا ماشین‌ها از انسان باهوش‌تر خواهند شد، آیا می‌توانند شغل‌ها را تصاحب کنند، یا حتی روزی کنترل تصمیم‌گیری‌های مهم را به دست گیرند؟ گروهی از زیست‌شناسان تکاملی در مقاله‌ای که اخیرا منتشر شده، معتقدند که این نگرانی‌ها فقط بخشی از مسئله را نشان می‌دهد. به باور

3👍3

30 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC665 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @adscognitive1

قیمت تعرفه های جدید/ خردادماه ۱۴۰۵ @cognitive_science_iran #تایمی ① . 24 ساعت 1 ساعت پست آخر | 500 تومان ② . 48 ساعت 2 ساعت پست آخر + یک بار ریشات | 550 تومان ‌③ . پست آخر شبانه 24 تا 10صبح | 510 تومان ④. پست‌ آخر شبانه 24 تا 10 صبح +24 ساعت پست آزاد | 550 تومان 👁‍🗨 #بازدید ⑤ • 1 کا بازدید | 550 تومان ⑥ • 2 کا بازدید | 700 تومان #رزرو_تبلیغات 👈 @mmasiha1988

29 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC848 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سلسله سخنرانی‌های علوم اعصاب Oscillations and Information Processing in Nervous Systems سخنران: دکتر علیرضا ولیزاده یکشنبه ۱۱ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۱۵:۰۰ لینک جلسه آنلاین: https://skyroom.online/ch/ipm-scs/seminar @cognitive_science_iran

3

27 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC957 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🧬 چرا پیر می‌شویم؟ «سایه تکامل» و معمای عمر طولانی 🔹آیا تا به حال فکر کرده‌اید که چرا با وجود پیشرفت علم، هنوز پیری و بیماری‌های وابسته به سن گریبان‌گیر ماست؟ یک پژوهش تازه در نشریه معتبر Nature Reviews Genetics به این پرسش پاسخ می‌دهد. 🔹این مطالعه با بررسی مفهوم علمی «سایه انتخاب» (Selection Shadow) نشان می‌دهد که چرا افزایش طول عمر لزوماً با سلامت بیشتر همراه نیست. 🔹 سایه انتخاب چیست؟ نیروی انتخاب طبیعی بیشترین

3

19 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,150 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آیا تکامل واقعاً آن‌قدر تصادفی است که فکر می‌کردیم؟ تصور کنید قرار است هفت نفر را که هیچ ارتباطی با یکدیگر ندارند به هفت نقطه مختلف جهان بفرستید و از آن‌ها بخواهید برای حل یک مسئله، راه‌حلی مستقل پیدا کنند. شهود ما می‌گوید احتمالاً هر کدام راه متفاوتی پیدا خواهند کرد. حالا فرض کنید پس از چند سال، متوجه شوید که همه آن‌ها تقریباً از ابزارها و ترفندهای یکسانی استفاده کرده‌اند. این تقریباً همان چیزی است که پژوهشگران دان

7👍3

18 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,050 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

به دلیل *محدودیت* در تعداد آزمایش ،*الویت ثبت نام به ترتیب زمان ثبت نام* است. حضور دو روز متوالی: روز اول، روز مصاحبه است، ۳۰ دقیقه طول می‌کشد. روز دوم، روز آزمایش و تست های رایانه ای: حداکثر ۲ ساعت طول می‌کشد. "برای هماهنگی، کسب اطلاعات بیشتر با شماره 6047-630-0902 تماس بگیرید یا روی این لینک کلیک کنید تا فرم را پر نمایید:" ​این لینک به طور مستقیم شما را به فرم ثبت نام هدایت می‌کند. https://survey.porsline.ir/

3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cognitive_science_iran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دیالکتیک علمی
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Sherwin Vakili (شروین وکیلی)
@sherwin_vakili · 22,095
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علوم شناختی” (@cognitive_science_iran), 6,063 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cognitive_science_iran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.