Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кринж

Channel

кринж

@cringeestory

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42,871subscribers

-651 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259416619
TypeChannel
Username@cringeestory
DescriptionТолько реальные кринжовые истории со всего интернета и нашей предложки реклама: @achexdd
Created10 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cringeestory

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@cringeestory/19828 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC@anonstoryss/248225 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC1.007.0 hours
@cringeestory/19829 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC@anonstoryss/248235 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC1.006.7 hours
@cringeestory/19830 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC@anonstoryss/248255 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC1.006.4 hours
@cringeestory/19831 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC@anonstoryss/248265 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC1.006.0 hours
@cringeestory/19832 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC@anonstoryss/248275 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC1.006.0 hours
@anonstoryss/248346 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC@cringeestory/19846 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC1.0023 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@anonstoryss14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @cringeestory — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

42,87143,52243,196.56 August 2026 — 43,522 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,480 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,452 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,424 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,405 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,382 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,363 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,332 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,305 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,280 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,262 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,249 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,230 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,201 subscribers23 August 2026 — 43,172 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,119 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,094 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,069 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,046 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,022 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,997 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,983 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,962 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,936 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,906 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,871 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -651. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,773–43,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:2142,871-35
2 Sept 2026, 20:3842,906-30
1 Sept 2026, 19:5342,936-26
31 Aug 2026, 17:4842,962-21
30 Aug 2026, 15:1342,983-14
29 Aug 2026, 17:0242,997-25
28 Aug 2026, 14:3443,022-24
27 Aug 2026, 16:1243,046-23
26 Aug 2026, 15:3543,069-25
25 Aug 2026, 17:0843,094-25
24 Aug 2026, 17:4643,119-53
23 Aug 2026, 02:0543,172-29
21 Aug 2026, 15:4743,201-29
20 Aug 2026, 11:2243,230-19
19 Aug 2026, 12:1243,249-13
18 Aug 2026, 14:4343,262-18
17 Aug 2026, 13:4943,280-25
16 Aug 2026, 07:4943,305-27
14 Aug 2026, 15:2843,332-31
13 Aug 2026, 03:0443,363first reading

Engagement

289 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.61%
avg views ÷ 42,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
263 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
263
of 289 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 257 of 263 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held289 (3 August 20265 September 2026)
Views total294,233
Reactions total6,047
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 22:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
74
Videos
4
Links
135

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,786 reactions across 282 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,42335.7%
😁1,57023.1%
🤯1,51322.3%
👍5998.83%
🔥5698.38%
🥰1121.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 283 of the 289 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,786 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 289 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC195 views10 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Мой парень работает в травмпункте санитаром. Недавно принес мне в подарок губную помаду, которая стоит 5к. Я удивилась, откуда такие бабки на косметику, акция что ли в летуаль была? А потом он рассказал, что однажды ночью к ним привезли девку, которая засунула себе эту помаду в задний проход... Ппц подарочек, типа чего добру пропадать, в магазине же дорого!

7🤯1🥰1😁1

5 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC363 views12 reactionsread 5 September 2026

П20. Есть ебанутый друг, как-то раз он пришел к своей двоюродной тетке (к слову, милфа 35 лет), а она спала бухая. Ну он полез к ней под платье и стал делать куни... в итоге его застал за этим делом тетин муж и ебанул так, что сломал челюсть. А друг все равно доволен, хоть и лежит в больничке - исполнил свою мечту...

😁11🤯1

5 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC497 views12 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Мой кент поймал бабу на измене - ебалась с соседом по работе. Выкинул её вещи с балкона, она стала орать внизу, он ей говорил съеби по-хорошему, она не уходила. Тогда он сбросил на нее кресло🤣 Щас деваха лежит в больнице с переломанной шеей.

🤯111

5 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC579 views14 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Д19. Живу со знакомой девчонкой с потока. Я хз, как и где её воспитывали, потому что дрочит она по ночам с криками на всю квартиру! Это, блять, для чего вообще так делать? В чём прикол? Каждый раз приходится давать знать ей, что я не сплю, чтоб заткнулась. Ещё оставляет на видных местах свой чёртов вибратор. Приходится ещё и проверять не лежит ли он где-то на видном месте, перед приходом гостей.

10🤯4

5 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC661 views18 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Есть у меня соседка, ей 40 лет... и вот значит, она меня все зазывает к сееб, но она стремная на вид, скажаем прямо. Даже с таким недотрахом как у меня, не встанет, скорее всего. И вот она уже впрямую меня зовут и говорит, что любит когда на нее ссут. Я такой завис, говорю - как ссут? Она - ну просто, я залезу в ванну, а ты на меня пописяешь за тысячу рублей, делов-то. Ну и вот что думаете, соглашаться или нет?

👍12🤯51

5 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC677 views14 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Сосед по съёмной квартире постоянно приводит девушку. Да не просто - ебутся так, что мне ухо закладывает. Стены тонкие, диван у него скрипит, как будто в фильме ужасов, и всё это в 2 часа ночи. Один раз не выдержал - постучал, тишина. А потом в общий чат пишет: "Не стучите, уважаемые, у нас любовь".

😁131

5 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC727 views23 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Я очень старалась, когда у него был день рождения: не спала, готовила бенто-торт, ждала 12:00 и поздравила его. А сегодня, когда у меня день рождения, он даже словами не поздравил, а я всё ждала… Как бы вы поступили на моём месте?

🤯211😁1

5 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC782 views2 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

🎁1⃣2️⃣3⃣👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 💍1000 колечек бесплатно! 💍 1-1000 местам по 1 колечку 💍 для участия: ✅подписка на @alinlav ✅ поставить любую реакцию! 🍀Всем удачи 💍

2

5 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC750 views20 reactionsread 5 September 2026

П18. Много читал разных историй про то, как к многих лучшие друзья начинают встречаться с вашей девушкой. И тоже самое случилось. Друг, с который знакомы были 11 лет, с первого класса, начал встречаться с моей девушкой, с которой совсем недавно разошлись. Спросил у него, мол че за херня, типо знакомы так долго а он девку увел. А он ответил что-то типо "не хочу смотреть в прошлое с тобой, сорян, хочу видеть будущее с

😁11🤯63

5 Sept 2026, 04:40 UTC779 views20 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Д23. Кринж - это когда парень при мне обсуждает со своим батей, как далеко я сквиртую

🔥113🤯3😁3

4 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC864 views11 reactionsread 5 September 2026

П24. Ехал недавно с города домой.попросила девчонка помочь вытащить коляску по приезду. Разговорились обменялись контактами, в итоге эта шкура начала гнать что я ей предлагал секс в автобусе и меня хочет отпи3дить не муж😕

🤯101

4 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC893 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Д21 Приветики Сегодня пошла по врачам т.к. У меня болел живот с левой стороны.(меня продуло под кондиционером) Захожу я к терапевту и она мне назначает гинеколога. Я на отрез не хотела к нему ходить потому что обращаюсь к другому в платную клинику. Прихожу значит она меня смотрит и такой бред выдаёт. "Твой организм готовился к беременности, вижу у тебя плод замерший, он у тебя сдох в этом месяце, можно детей не ждать

7🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 289 posts we hold for @cringeestory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кринж” (@cringeestory), 42,871 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cringeestory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.