Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Detecter Bros

Channel

Detecter Bros

@detecter_calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13,051subscribers

+163 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001734225883
TypeChannel
Username@detecter_calls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/detecter_calls

Growth

12,83613,05112,943.57 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,882 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,879 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,885 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,892 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,889 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,870 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,887 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,886 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,884 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,870 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,897 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,887 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,836 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,846 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,855 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,892 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,927 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,918 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,982 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,051 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 33 days, net +163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,804–13,083 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 20:5513,051+69
6 Sept 2026, 16:1912,982+64
4 Sept 2026, 07:5912,918-9
2 Sept 2026, 18:1612,927+35
1 Sept 2026, 16:1312,892+37
31 Aug 2026, 14:1512,855+9
30 Aug 2026, 15:3712,846+5
29 Aug 2026, 17:5812,841-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:0512,842+6
27 Aug 2026, 15:1812,836-51
26 Aug 2026, 13:4612,887-10
25 Aug 2026, 13:0612,897-1
24 Aug 2026, 10:0412,898+28
22 Aug 2026, 20:0812,870-18
21 Aug 2026, 10:4512,888+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:3412,884-2
19 Aug 2026, 11:4712,886-10
18 Aug 2026, 10:4312,896+9
17 Aug 2026, 14:0512,887+17
16 Aug 2026, 06:4512,870first reading

Engagement

234 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.60%
avg views ÷ 13,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
730
189 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
200
of 234 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 188 of 189 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held234 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total138,032
Reactions total7,313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,646 reactions across 220 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,35438.8%
👍2,82032.6%
🔥2,27726.3%
👏1051.21%
😱901.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 221 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @detecter_calls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 234 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC427 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

RH coins need a small rest before the main run comes. remember, we still haven’t seen a $1B runner yet. every major chain had the same motion this cycle, with multiple $5-7B meme runners. this is just the warm-up. the long rail is still ahead.

🔥74

2 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC587 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Robinhood, yes. Let's find new play there.

🔥214👍3

2 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC603 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

$BITCAT bought a bag today around $1.8m MC. i dug into the dev and tokenomics, and a few things caught my attention: • 40% of supply burned forever • 11% locked so over 50% of the total supply is currently out of circulation, which is pretty interesting at this valuation. the lore is even better. $BITCAT traces back to the first cat visually inscribed on the Bitcoin blockchain in 2014, mined into block 322,917.

🔥274

2 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTCviews —

Detecter Bros pinned «but when you start winning, you have to be even more careful. more wins can make you greedy, and greed makes it much easier to give everything back. the best meme coin traders aren’t trying to hit a 1000x on every trade. they survive long enough to make…»

2 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,230 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026

You gave me a lot of money bro I really appreciate of you 🙏😍

👍2316

2 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC632 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

but when you start winning, you have to be even more careful. more wins can make you greedy, and greed makes it much easier to give everything back. the best meme coin traders aren’t trying to hit a 1000x on every trade. they survive long enough to make 1000 trades until that one 1000x finally comes. you realize the real game? you have to survive long enough for the market to reward you. if you keep sizing your

29👍2

2 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC608 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Where are you mainly trading right now? 👍 if Robinhood ❤️ if Solana

👍4034

2 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC680 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

can’t say too much right now while almost every call is pumping hard asf 😂 $AI: 150x on the stock × meme meta $MOO + $SPACEHOOD: 100x+ on the beta plays $PONS: 30x crazy moves, but don’t take this as a reason to FOMO in. if you haven’t done your own research, don’t chase the chart after the move. i’m just a person too. i can be wrong and i can make mistakes. NFA DYOR if you’re trenching with me here.

16👍6

2 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC692 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

don’t forget to bid a small bag on the launchpad’s token while it’s still cheap. find your entry and be patient. don’t FOMO into the chart. 0x385b36Ff682Ab4C76E7c37A66b96aABC466471d5

🔥35👍2

2 Sept 2026, 08:24 UTC663 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

you’re not frong, you're just early

26👍21

2 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC689 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026

+80% in a single hour. but I know RH players know how to hold much better than SOL players. welcome if you just joined here btw. 🙌

👍2719

2 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC695 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

I swear I'm not an Insider. But they've waited for me to call this 😂

22👍20🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @detecter_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Detecter Bros” (@detecter_calls), 13,051 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/detecter_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.