Генетик Карина Ким pinned a photo

Channel
Генетик Карина Ким
@dr_karina_kim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,582subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001636083671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_karina_kim |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_karina_kim |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 4,582 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 4,586 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 4,590 | +5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 4,585 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 4,582 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 4,583 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 4,587 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 4,583 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 4,587 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 4,586 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 4,585 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 4,588 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 4,587 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 4,587 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
333 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 136 | 40.8% | |
| ❤ | 131 | 39.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 9.01% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 4.50% | |
| custom 6334853809847666473 | 11 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5434031913260035048 | 7 | 2.10% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.3% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 11
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
- Most on one post
- 7
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_karina_kim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
↗️ЛИПЕДЕМА - Часть 1 Этим постом мне бы хотелось открыть цикл про липедему - диагноз, который неизвестен абсолютному большинству врачей, нутрициологов и фитнес-тренеров. Как следствие миллионы женщин не получают лечение, а получают психологический дискомфорт, борясь с ветряными мельницами псевдоожирения. В этом посте обсуждаем историю и проблемы, ну а дальше обсудим симптомы, патофизиологию, диагностику и подходы …
❤35👍16🔥7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👍2
Posted without readable text
🔥29👍9❤4🤝1😢1
Posted without readable text
❤10🔥4👌1
Ко мне уже приходило несколько человек с генетическими паспортами от поликлиники, кстати! Жаль, что исходные данные, по-моему, не дают! Но для бесплатного анализа очень неплохо, потом поищу, покажу, что вошло!
🔥7
Дай Бог! Чудесно, что так получилось. Но мы, например, сдали в детской Московской поликлинике генетику. Принимают не везде, но в нашей было, активно зазывали возле кабинета сдачи крови. Меня вообще не надо было уговаривать, хотя генетика у нас сдана. С 0 до 17 лет включительно можно.
🔥4
Posted without readable text
❤20🔥14
Posted without readable text
🔥36❤13custom 63348538098476664736
Posted without readable text
🔥25❤18custom 63348538098476664735👍3🙈1
Дорогие друзья! Мы написали классный пост! Обновите, пожалуйста, свой телеграм, иначе пост превратится в тыкву 🎃
👌9❤6
‼️Информация для тех, кто зашел в пробный период! В субботу вышел второй урок — обязательно его посмотрите! Только этот один урок уже очень многое объяснит о том, как устроена наша жизнь в биологическом смысле: 🌟откуда берется энергия, 🌟как связана еда с работой каждой клетки нашего организма, 🌟почему одни вещества становятся строительным материалом, другие — источником энергии, а третьи — сигнальными молекулами. …
❤18🔥10custom 54340319132600350487👌5
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dr_karina_kim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mazaevdoc · 36,624
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@lavkalekary · 23,574
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
@doclana_mornatural · 31,642
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
@yusipovacom · 54,288
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@zametki_nevrologa · 71,593
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@annacheeta · 33,816
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
@krushanova · 21,841
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@uniprof_med · 32,087
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@ximiya_tasya_ro · 24,353
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@dzhobavaeliso · 31,654
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
@gastrosmile · 41,219
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@doc_gastro_life · 77,348
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@zdravomislievede · 31,498
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Генетик Карина Ким” (@dr_karina_kim), 4,582 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_karina_kim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.