Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for О лечении миом

Channel

О лечении миом

@dr_shefova_mioma

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,551subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946854604
TypeChannel
Username@dr_shefova_mioma
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_shefova_mioma

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@drshefova_menopause/32625 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC@dr_shefova_mioma/535 · this entry25 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@drshefova_menopause/32727 Apr 2026, 09:25 UTC@dr_shefova_mioma/541 · this entry18 May 2026, 09:20 UTC1.0021 days
@drshefova_menopause/3281 May 2026, 09:35 UTC@dr_shefova_mioma/542 · this entry22 May 2026, 09:45 UTC1.0021 days
@dr_shefova_mioma/543 · this entry23 May 2026, 03:29 UTC@drshefova_menopause/33023 May 2026, 06:35 UTC1.003.1 hours
@drshefova_menopause/33112 Jun 2026, 06:33 UTC@dr_shefova_mioma/544 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 06:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@dr_shefova_polip/43825 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC@dr_shefova_mioma/538 · this entry29 Apr 2026, 15:40 UTC1.004 days
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@drshefova_menopause5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.1 hours@drshefova_menopause (32)
@dr_shefova_polip5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 days@dr_shefova_polip (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @dr_shefova_polip. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,5516,5956,5737 August 2026 — 6,580 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,579 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,585 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,586 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,595 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,586 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,572 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,569 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,560 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,561 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,557 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,551 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,544–6,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 14:176,551-6
9 Sept 2026, 17:146,557-4
3 Sept 2026, 22:586,561+1
1 Sept 2026, 00:376,560-9
28 Aug 2026, 14:376,569-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:456,572-14
23 Aug 2026, 08:176,586-9
20 Aug 2026, 06:126,595+9
13 Aug 2026, 13:056,586+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:176,585+6
7 Aug 2026, 16:516,579-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:016,580first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 25 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

505 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30059.4%
👍7915.6%
🔥377.33%
😭295.74%
🙏244.75%
❤‍🔥132.57%
💯132.57%
😨40.792%
👏20.396%
😴20.396%
👎10.198%
🤨10.198%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 505 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC544 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Субмукозная миома 28×27 мм и обильные месячные — возможно консервативное лечение или только хирургическое? Субмукозная миома такого размера с обильными кровотечениями — это почти всегда показание к гистероскопии (удаление узла через полость матки). Это малая операция, без разрезов. Консервативные методы при субмукозной миоме с кровотечением работают слабо и не устраняют причину. Конечно, можно параллельно начинать и

11👍4

15 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC930 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Субмукозный узел, кровотечение, 54 года, пока оставили без удаления. Как поддерживать и что противопоказано? Субмукозная миома с кровотечением — ситуация, которая требует активного решения, особенно в постменопаузе. Если кровотечение продолжается, гистероскопическое удаление узла — это хирургия одного дня, малотравматичная. Пока ждёте — противопоказаны: тепловые процедуры (баня, горячая ванна, грелка на живот), инте

18👍1

11 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,450 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Миома 3 см, последние 3 месяца цикл стал 12 дней кровотечения. Как уменьшить или сделать ЭМА? 12 дней кровотечения — это много, и это напрямую ведёт к анемии. Миома 3 см при таком расположении (скорее всего, близко к полости) может давать именно такую картину. ЭМА — вполне рабочий вариант для таких случаев. Но сначала важно понять тип миомы по классификации FIGO (это покажет УЗИ или МРТ). Также стоит проверить показ

13

8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,580 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Что делать с кровотечениями? Зависит от того, что именно происходит. Обильные месячные (меняете прокладку каждые 1–2 часа), кровотечения в середине цикла или между месячными — всё это требует обследования, а не просто «наблюдения». Первые шаги: УЗИ, чтобы понять тип и размер узла; общий анализ крови — проверить гемоглобин, эритроциты, гематокрит, MCV; консультация с врачом об остановке кровотечения. Если показатели,

16

4 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,660 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Может ли болезнь мужа (синдром Клайнфельтера) вызвать у меня миому? Нет, это невозможно. Хромосомные аномалии мужа не передаются вам ни через кровь, ни через биоматериал. У вас свой набор хромосом, и он не меняется. Причины вашей миомы нужно искать в вашем собственном гормональном фоне, образе жизни и генетике.

👍93

1 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,830 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Почему появляется миома именно в шейке матки? За год выросла до 2,5 см. Мог ли УЗИ спровоцировать миому? Шеечная миома — редкость, примерно 1–2% всех миом. Причины те же, что и для обычных, просто «неудачное» место для первой мутировавшей клетки. УЗИ — абсолютно безопасная процедура, она не провоцирует никаких опухолей.

9👎1

28 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,060 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Есть ли взаимосвязь между миомой и лишним весом? Да, прямая. Жировая ткань — это не просто запас энергии, она сама производит эстроген. Чем больше жировой ткани, тем выше фон эстрогена — а это главная «пища» для миомы. Поэтому снижение веса реально помогает замедлить рост узлов. Это одна из немногих вещей, которые полностью в наших руках.

🙏24❤‍🔥132🤨1

27 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,060 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

44 года, ФСГ 27,49, эстрадиол 23,6, миомы, аденомиоз, обильные кровотечения — врач отказывается от Мирены, назначил лигнаны и Утрожестан 400 мг ФСГ 27,49 при эстрадиоле 23,6 пг/мл — это картина перименопаузы с уже сниженной функцией яичников. На этом фоне обильные кровотечения и кровотечения на 2–3 день цикла при миомах и аденомиозе — это не то, что можно контролировать только лигнанами. Лигнаны (из льна или других

16

26 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,680 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Здравствуйте! Подскажите пожалуйста как работать с воспалением организма? Что пить, есть Очень рекомендую с изучения этих постов. Как найти воспаление в организме https://t.me/dr_shefova/3243 Как найти воспаление в малом тазу https://t.me/dr_shefova/3247 Завтра стартует интенсив на 2 недели по эндометриозу, кто не знает с чего начать. Будет информация и по воспалению и по питанию и многое другое! Очень актуально

8

25 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,650 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Не понимаю причину: миома появилась в 25 лет (сейчас 28). Беременность была в 27. В молодом возрасте миомы нередко связаны с ранним эстрогеновым доминированием, стрессом, дефицитом витамина D, воспалительным фоном. То, что она вас не беспокоит — хорошо. Главное сейчас — понять, есть ли рост, и поддержать гормональный баланс.

18

21 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,080 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026

У меня эндометриоз, теперь сказали — миома. Из-за миомы могут быть мазки перед менструацией? Мажущие выделения перед месячными чаще связана не с миомой, а с эндометриозом или недостаточностью второй фазы цикла (мало прогестерона). Если у вас уже есть эндометриоз, то именно он, скорее всего, виноват в этом симптоме. Маленькая миома редко даёт такой симптом сама по себе.

10👍10

18 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,390 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026

У меня миома появилась через 2 месяца после ковида, вторая — после второго заражения. Может ли причиной быть только вирусная нагрузка? Вирус может стать мощным провокатором у тех, у кого уже есть предрасположенность. Ковид вызывает системное воспаление, нарушает гормональный фон, иммунитет, работу сосудов. Скорее всего, уже были условия для роста (гормональный дисбаланс, дефициты и т.д.), а вирус подтолкнул процесс.

21🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @dr_shefova_mioma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dr_shefova_mioma edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🚷 Переходник 🚷
@dr_shefova · 3
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“О лечении миом” (@dr_shefova_mioma), 6,551 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_shefova_mioma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.