Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Женское здоровье | Ольга Андросова

Channel

Женское здоровье | Ольга Андросова

@drandrosova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,326subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001389898671
TypeChannel
Username@drandrosova
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drandrosova

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,2938,3698,3317 August 2026 — 8,293 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,293 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,305 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,353 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,369 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,362 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,360 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,355 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,356 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,360 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,354 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,345 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,334 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,326 subscribers8,3267 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,282–8,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:008,326-8
14 Sept 2026, 17:168,334-11
11 Sept 2026, 12:008,345-9
6 Sept 2026, 15:218,354-6
2 Sept 2026, 08:348,360+4
29 Aug 2026, 23:568,356+1
27 Aug 2026, 09:278,355-5
24 Aug 2026, 03:278,360-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:528,362-7
17 Aug 2026, 19:258,369+16
14 Aug 2026, 10:278,353+10
11 Aug 2026, 04:348,343+38
8 Aug 2026, 01:068,305+12
7 Aug 2026, 12:168,293no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:098,293first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.54%
avg views ÷ 8,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
545
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held56 (28 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total7,081
Reactions total237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

520 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39175.2%
🔥6913.3%
👍214.04%
❤‍🔥203.85%
😢91.73%
💯61.15%
👀10.192%
👏10.192%
😁10.192%
🤮10.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 520 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC534 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Иногда мне хочется сделать себе харакири из-за постоянного желания совершенствовать все в себе и вокруг))) Но Миша Филяев сказал мне, что лечить это не нужно Мир потеряет движение иначе🤣 На этой прекрасной ноте завершаем болтовню) Завтра продолжим🤎

32👏1😁1

24 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC493 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Я сразу хочу сделать акцент: я не хочу порождать в вас комплексы! Просто делюсь своими мыслями и решениями Я вижу на пляже много счастливых женщин с неидеальной фигурой И это супер! Но мне для счастья нужно, чтобы меня во мне ничего не раздражало🤣

17👍5

24 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC491 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А это фото сделала София, после 1,5 км в море я уже не позировала и тут четко видно, что кожа живота — оверсайз. Сколько я не работала айкун, нужны другие меры! Обсудим с моими докторами КЛМед осенью два варианта: -полимолочная кислота -RF-лифтинг

15

24 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC477 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Многие считают, что мне повезло с фигурой Это не так. То, что вы видите — результат серьезного труда. Только последний год я позволила себе сбавить обороты из-за другой нагрузки. Но я намерена нарастить обороты на пятом десятке 🤣 С сентября я добавлю силовые тренировки, хочу увеличить мышечную массу на 2 кг, в помощь будут пептиды, конечно Основная цель — выпрямить спину , поднять ягодицы, подтянуть трицепс Взяла

15

24 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC467 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

По мне вот она - идеальная попка 🌰😁 Тут, конечно, боженька постарался и не нужно корпеть над стройной фигурой Хотя у Полины 7-8 часов танцев в неделю и мы, наконец, нашли пару🤎

12

24 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC543 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Друзья, мне 44 в ноябре и я хочу поговорить с вами о красоте тела У меня есть определенные претензии к себе: 👉🏼 объемные бедра: достались от папы 👉🏼 голень «бутылочкой»: я люблю это, но вот многим не нравится, вкусовщина 👉🏼 грудь, конечно, -0, после всех кормлений 👉🏼 но самое важное: это ягодницы, их форма мне никогда не нравилась. Я считаю, такое строение связано с уровнем андрогенов, и часто сопровождает СПКЯ или

22🔥7👍6

23 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC631 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Кайфую с ними рядом🥰 Но мы с мужем поняли, что этот формат отдыха не для нас больше! В следующем году хотим виллу только для нас и дикий пляж. Возможно, в движении на авто или яхте🤎 Вообще классно провели время, несмотря на дефицит сервиса, позже расскажу вам ещё инсайты🤎

29

23 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC560 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Мой цветок: самый беспроблемный ребенок — не болеет, всегда всему рада, эмоции ровные, всегда на дофамине, но умеренно🤎

15

23 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC524 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

А Яков в этом году сильно зашел в роль отца, я даже немного в шоке😃 Возможно, я дала ему возможность Раньше, конечно, более активной и тревожной мамой была

8

23 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC495 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Уровень моего напряга на пляжном отдыхе с 5 детьми - ноль! Все самостоятельные🤎

10

23 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC473 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Расскажу про отдых, это заслуживает внимания🤎 Было 6 ночей и 7 дней в Белек, которые лично мне не понравились: кухня - не та, море - не то, интересных мест - нет Но ДЕТИ в восторге и мы с мужем наслаждались их счастьем!

❤‍🔥15

23 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC492 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Друзья, мы прилетели домой! ❤️ С такими помощницами я смогла все сделать за 7 часов: - 5 стирок, чуть даже погладила - разложила вещи, собрала новый чемодан в Москву, достаточно плотно, так как обратный билет ещё не покупала - приготовила ужин: полезный и вкусный И у меня много отпускного контента! Хотите?😁❤️

12💯5

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @drandrosova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@drandrosova edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Как думаете? Все погрузились?

  1. Да, а как по-другому!55%
  2. Нет🥶45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Химия Пищи/Биохакинг/ А.Родионова
@ximiya_tasya_ro · 24,353
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Здравомыслие в еде
@zdravomislievede · 31,498
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женское здоровье | Ольга Андросова” (@drandrosova), 8,326 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drandrosova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.