Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор В.К. Зафираки

Channel

Доктор В.К. Зафираки

@drzafiraki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,255subscribers

+153 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001268339820
TypeChannel
Username@drzafiraki
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/drzafiraki

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

19,09819,26219,1807 August 2026 — 19,102 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,103 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,098 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,113 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,112 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,109 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,102 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,117 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,118 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,114 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,117 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,120 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,127 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,126 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,121 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,125 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,141 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,150 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,151 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,152 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,154 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,148 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,149 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,174 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,177 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,178 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,186 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,177 subscribers26 September 2026 — 19,190 subscribers4 October 2026 — 19,179 subscribers8 October 2026 — 19,191 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,215 subscribers14 October 2026 — 19,224 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,231 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,238 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,245 subscribers18 October 2026 — 19,256 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,252 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,249 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,251 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,255 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,256 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,255 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,260 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,255 subscribers28 October 2026 — 19,258 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,252 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,257 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,260 subscribers1 November 2026 — 19,262 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,260 subscribers3 November 2026 — 19,258 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,254 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,246 subscribers6 November 2026 — 19,244 subscribers7 November 2026 — 19,243 subscribers8 November 2026 — 19,255 subscribers19,2557 August 20268 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,073–19,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 18:5019,255+12
7 Nov 2026, 09:1619,243-1
6 Nov 2026, 12:2219,244-2
5 Nov 2026, 09:1819,246-8
4 Nov 2026, 09:0619,254-4
3 Nov 2026, 06:2819,258-2
2 Nov 2026, 06:3619,260-2
1 Nov 2026, 03:0619,262+2
31 Oct 2026, 05:0819,260+3
30 Oct 2026, 07:0619,257+5
29 Oct 2026, 08:0019,252-6
28 Oct 2026, 08:2919,258+3
27 Oct 2026, 06:4819,255-5
26 Oct 2026, 06:2919,260+5
25 Oct 2026, 09:2119,255-1
24 Oct 2026, 12:0619,256+1
23 Oct 2026, 14:5419,255+4
22 Oct 2026, 13:5919,251+2
20 Oct 2026, 06:3519,249-3
19 Oct 2026, 09:5519,252first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 19,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,070
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held53 (25 April 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total73,200
Reactions total2,025
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 00s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,372 reactions across 53 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,48147.2%
❤1,67622.7%
🔥6849.28%
😁3624.91%
🙏2192.97%
🤔1552.10%
👏1411.91%
💯1001.36%
😱781.06%
👀720.977%
❤‍🔥690.936%
💔530.719%
👌460.624%
🤷‍♀450.61%
😭360.488%
🤓280.38%
😡220.298%
😨180.244%
🙈180.244%
🤩160.217%
12 further kinds530.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (38.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,420 views70 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Можно ли похудеть на Форсиге? Представьте лекарство, благодаря которому организм ежедневно теряет с мочой сотни килокалорий. Без дополнительных физических нагрузок и даже если человек продолжает есть сладкое. Каким же должно быть снижение веса за несколько месяцев? А за полгода? Учёные проверили это в клинических исследованиях и получили любопытные результаты. Сколько килограммов действительно можно потерять на Ф…

👍49❤14❤‍🔥4🤔3

6 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC≈1,780 views66 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍26❤25🔥9❤‍🔥3🤔3

4 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,210 views107 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍58😁30❤14💯5

3 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC≈2,940 views94 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

«Мне установили стент. А через сколько лет его придётся менять?» — один из частых вопросов пациентов после стентирования коронарных артерий. Пять лет? Десять? Или стент может прослужить всю жизнь? Современное стентирование позволяет восстановить кровоток в артериях сердца. Но даже после успешно проведённой операции у некоторых пациентов вновь возникают сужения сосудов, стенокардия, а иногда и инфаркт миокарда. Поче…

❤46👍32🔥16

30 Oct 2026, 17:53 UTC≈3,830 views127 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Лекарство без побочных эффектов — мечта любого пациента. Особенно если производитель обещает полную безопасность. Но академик АМН СССР Борис Евгеньевич Вотчал предложил взглянуть на такие обещания несколько иначе. Его замечание не потеряло актуальности и сегодня. Перешлите любителям абсолютно безопасных лекарств.

👍90🔥24❤8🤔5

28 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC≈3,970 views100 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Урюпинский ГМУ. После заседания кафедры 🫠

😁54🔥33👏8❤5

26 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC≈4,440 views97 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍64❤16🔥11❤‍🔥6

26 Oct 2026, 07:44 UTC≈4,700 views118 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Уже знакомый вам многоопытный преподаватель и врач - доцент И.С.Пыльников дал мне интервью прямо у себя на кафедре, и рассказал, что он думает о таких неоднозначных лекарствах, как статины.

😁63👍34❤12🔥6🤔2👏1

25 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈4,000 views92 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥40👍28❤19❤‍🔥5

24 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC≈3,560 views90 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥45👍30❤15

22 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈4,640 views183 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Бляшка в сонной артерии всего 25%. Неужели уже нужен статин? УЗИ обнаружило атеросклеротическую бляшку, которая сужает сонную артерию лишь на четверть. Кровоток практически не нарушен, никаких симптомов нет. Казалось бы, зачем принимать лекарства? Но насколько безопасна такая находка? Существует ли определённый размер бляшки, после которого статины становятся необходимы? И может ли даже небольшой стеноз сонной арте…

👍89❤64🔥22🤔4❤‍🔥2👎2

18 Oct 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,240 views115 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Бывший президент США перенёс коронарное шунтирование и стентирование, после чего полностью пересмотрел своё питание. Теперь он рассказывает о поразительных результатах растительной диеты: атеросклероз отступает, бляшки уменьшаются, а кальциевые отложения в артериях якобы исчезают. И самое интересное — Клинтон ссылается не на сомнительных целителей, а на научные исследования, опубликованные в одном из самых авторите…

🔥51👍41😁9❤8😨5❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @drzafiraki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @drzafiraki as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

НЕ ЛЕЧИТЕ МЕНЯ. Доктор Вожова
@nelechitemenya · 3,378
#1
Доктор Королёв
@dockorolev_channel · 7,631
#2
ImmunoBee
@immunobee1 · 103,889
#3
АНЧА БАРАНОВА
@anchabaranova · 35,896
#4
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 138,346
#5
Эндокринолог, психолог Игнатьева Полина
@doc_ignateva · 4,581
#6
dnevnikdoctora
@dnevnikdoctora · 45,182
#7
З̆̈ӑ̈п̆̈й̈с̆̈к̆̈й̈❣️ М̆̈ӗ̈д̆̈с̆̈ӗ̈с̆̈т̆̈р̆̈ы̆̈
@medsestra_dona · 5,485
#8
Headache_dr
@headache_dr · 16,143
#9
new Кардиология
@cardiology_info · 19,239
#10
Кардиолог Константин Крулёв
@kardiologKrulev · 17,969
#11
Нутрициология: просто о питании
@nutrition_dsc · 2,188
#12
Медицина
@medobrazovanye · 11,111
#13
Олег Лихачёв-Мищенко | Кардиохирург, аритмолог | РЧА в Ростове-на-Дону
@dr_aritmolog · 3,726
#14
Евразийская Ассоциация Терапевтов
@euatofficial · 9,181
#15
Денис Лебедев | Эндокринология MD.school
@true_endo · 12,158
#16
Российское кардиологическое общество
@scardioru · 14,989
#17
SupremeMed|Медицина
@suprememed · 6,401
#18
cardiologist_malania
@cardiologist_malania · 1,024
#19
Лайфхаки для врачей
@medhacker · 5,164
#20
АМПК. Междисциплинарные проблемы кардиологии
@publ_ampk · 7,095
#21
Non Nocere | Журнал для врачей
@newtjournal · 4,445
#22
Терапия: Созвездие
@progressivnyj_klinicist · 10,831
#23
Гастроэнтеролог & Терапевт
@doctor_sitkina · 42,049
#24
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,620
#25
Врач-психотерапевт Doc_nenashev
@docnenashev · 5,845
#26
Креативная кардиология - CARDIOGRAM
@cardiogram_uz · 21,122
#27
Доктор Искоростинский
@doctor_iskorostinsky · 1,047
#28
Гастроэнтеролог ХАРИТОНОВ Андрей Геннадьевич
@ag_kharitonov · 58,845
#29
Диетология ✨ Созвездие
@dietologia_dsc · 3,161
#30
Профессия – кардиолог
@profcardiologist · 20,932
#31
Nestarenie.ru - научно о продлении жизни и долголетии
@nestarenieRU · 3,360
#32
Гастроэнтеролог-нутрициолог
@gastrodoctor1 · 994
#33
Cardiology / Кардиология
@cardio_online · 6,857
#34
Кардиология с Александром Зарудским
@cardioZar · 1,241
#35
МедЗнат
@medznat_media · 2,191
#36
Адвокат Экстрасистол
@advokat_pvc · 4,702
#37
ATP Cardiology news | Новости кардиологии
@atp_cardiology_news · 2,614
#38
CardioLogic | Кардиология Кейсы
@cardiologic · 1,713
#39
Доктор Демченко
@demchenkodr · 16,386
#40
Кардиология & ФД. Академия Докстарклаб
@cardio_fd_dsc · 15,188
#41
@doctor_lobzhanidze
@doctor_lobzhanidze1 · 3,972
#42
Врачи говорят | Школа общения с пациентами
@vrachigovoryat · 1,646
#43
Русский медицинский журнал | РМЖ
@rusmedjournal · 4,102
#44
ДОКТОР ХАН
@doctorkhanstanislav · 57,306
#45
Отоневролог Оверченко Кира Владимировна dr.kira_ok
@drkiraok · 11,397
#46
Заметки невролога Овсянникова КС
@zametki_nevrologa · 72,056
#47
Доктор Егоров
@doctorilyaegorov · 32,840
#48
Медицина для всех
@medicin_time · 1,594
#49
Ревматолог подагролог | Панина ЕВ
@revmatolog_podagrolog · 7,143
#50
Будет больно. Российская версия
@ohkefir · 7,970
#51
глазами медика
@glazami_medica · 3,019
#52
Доктор Жесткова|Косметология
@drzhestkova · 2,611
#53
Наталья Ринская РИНОПТИКА
@rin_optica · 5,301
#54
ЛОР Ольга Палажук
@lorpalazchuk · 5,402
#55
Ладинец
@bf_ladinec · 260
#56
Наталья Владимировна
@butnats · 4,360 (as read 3 October 2026)
#57
Пермский врач. Юлия Каракулова
@karakulova59 · 829
#58
Психолог Ольга Батуева
@olga_batueva · 1,661
#59
Красножон Д.А. Хирург-онколог, маммолог
@breastcancernews · 15,820
#60
Институт междисциплинарной медицины
@dpo_imm · 1,575
#61
Нутрициолог Виктория Манукян ВИА КЛИНИК
@drmanukyanvia · 840
#62
Гастроэнтеролог Садыков
@gastro_sadykov · 6,311
#63
Нистратов online 📲
@nistratovonline · 338
#64
Нутрициология, диетология и Аюрведа с Dr.Robertovna
@dr_robertovna · 10,054
#65
Доктор Булах | Сексолог
@drbulah · 3,490
#66
Бородатый не пробовал | доктор Бурлаков
@doc_burlakov · 34,201
#67
Борис Мельцер • Нутрициология
@meltsercare · 1,877
#68
Васту-ответы с Владиславом Маркеллом
@akashaashraya · 3,282
#69
Елена Власова | Функциональная диагностика.
@nastavnik_fd · 845
#70
Молчанова Наталья_Lab
@natalimolchanova · 1,409
#71
Доктор Коуч Варвара Веретюк
@doctor_veretyuk · 8,527
#72
Doctor.Gastro
@doctorgastro · 6,118
#73
Школа для диетологов Docs4Docs
@Docs4Docs · 1,474
#74
Significo-АМГ
@significogene · 5,784
#75
Цинзерлинг | NEUROблог 🧠
@zinserling_neurology · 8,052
#76
🩺Доктор НМО
@doctor_nmo · 1,908
#77
Постневрология: блог доктора Карабутина
@vita_motus · 633
#78
Доктор Рудченко
@doctorrudchenko · 5,868
#79
Кардиолог Новикова Диана Сергеевна
@cardiolognovikova · 24,362
#80
Превентэйдж
@preventagecom · 13,412
#81
Женское здоровье | Ольга Андросова
@drandrosova · 8,285
#82
Детский ортопед|Коршунова Светлана
@svetlana_ortoped · 7,105
#83
Биохимия. Просто о сложном
@simplebestbiochemistry · 5,435
#84
Вопросы детской диетологии
@VDDjournal · 1,056
#85
Татьяна Хомякова, кардиолог, врач ФД ♥️
@Khomiakova_ecg · 2,251
#86
Мини-курс по психиатрии
@amo_psyfarm · 2,408
#87
Гастроэнтеролог Лопатина М.В.
@gastrogram · 36,881
#88
Brain media | УОМ
@uom_brainmedia · 4,894
#89
Первый медицинский канал I 1medTV
@firstmedtv · 11,213
#90
Мы ЭХОКГ друг друга 🔉
@praktikaEHOKG · 3,663
#91
Демкина верит!
@docstarclub · 4,004
#92
ПРОСТОЙ МЕДИК | AI✨
@prostojmediktj · 2,155
#93
💜Комсомольский Краснодар КМР
@kmr_krasnodar · 4,795
#94

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Егоров
@doctorilyaegorov · 32,840
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr.Anshina
@DrAnshina · 412,971
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 138,346
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор В.К. Зафираки” (@drzafiraki), 19,255 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drzafiraki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.