Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,085–19,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 05:16
19,177
-9
16 Sept 2026, 16:19
19,186
+8
14 Sept 2026, 19:57
19,178
+1
13 Sept 2026, 03:41
19,177
+3
11 Sept 2026, 03:18
19,174
+25
8 Sept 2026, 03:57
19,149
+1
3 Sept 2026, 06:24
19,148
-6
2 Sept 2026, 01:02
19,154
+2
31 Aug 2026, 21:23
19,152
+1
30 Aug 2026, 19:07
19,151
+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:25
19,150
+9
28 Aug 2026, 15:12
19,141
+18
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
19,123
-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:57
19,125
+4
25 Aug 2026, 16:49
19,121
-5
24 Aug 2026, 13:47
19,126
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:54
19,127
+7
21 Aug 2026, 09:35
19,120
+3
20 Aug 2026, 09:06
19,117
+3
19 Aug 2026, 08:22
19,114
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 19,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
29 (25 April 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
9,910
Reactions total
582
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
3m 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,587 reactions across 29 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,075
45.2%
❤
1,251
27.3%
🔥
258
5.62%
🙏
175
3.82%
🤔
99
2.16%
💯
89
1.94%
😁
81
1.77%
😱
78
1.70%
👏
75
1.64%
👀
70
1.53%
💔
53
1.16%
👌
44
0.959%
🤷♀
42
0.916%
😭
36
0.785%
🤓
28
0.61%
😡
22
0.48%
❤🔥
20
0.436%
🙈
18
0.392%
🤩
15
0.327%
😨
13
0.283%
11 further kinds
45
0.981%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Отвечая некоторым несознательным товарищам, непонимающим политику партии, замечу: статины и Октябрь несовместимы, ибо статины — порождение чуждой нам капиталистической науки, выкормленной в мрачных лабораториях фармацевтических трестов и поставленной на службу холестериновым магнатам Уолл-стрит. Прикрываясь лживыми лозунгами «снижения риска» и «доказательной медицины», наймиты международного статинового капитала стре…
Статины после 70 лет: для России результат может означать больше
Нужно ли начинать статин после 70 лет, если инфаркта и инсульта ещё не было? В совсем недавно обнародованных результатах затянувшегося и долгожданного исследования STAREE почти 10 тысяч здоровых пожилых австралийцев шесть лет получали аторвастатин или плацебо.
Крупные сердечно-сосудистые осложнения произошли у 6,0% принимавших статин и у 8,3% получавши…
Сэкономил пациентке 25 тыс в месяц
Женщина была на консультации у сосудистого хирурга по поводу венозных проблем. И хотя флебологи происходят из сердечно-сосудистых хирургов, но большинство из них погружаются именно в патологию вен, а от остального в той или иной мере отходят.
Тем более меня удивили сделанные назначения по принципу «есть отклонение в анализах - будем корректировать числа в анализе».
У пациентки ли…
Как я немного побыл андрологом
Иногда пациент приходит к кардиологу таким извилистым путём, что к концу консультации уже не вполне понимаешь, по какой специальности работаешь.
Недавно на онлайн-консультации мы обсуждали историю мужчины, чьи хождения по врачам начались с эпизода эректильной дисфункции. Подробности, не имеющие отношения к сути истории, я намеренно изменил.
Сначала пациент обратился к урологу. По его с…
Ещё раз хочу предупредить своих подписчиков! Я никогда не пишу никому в личные сообщения и не предлагаю своих консультаций первым! Тем более, не беру за это предоплату.
Не поддавайтесь на уловки мошенников! Если кому-то нужна консультация - это всегда обращение ко мне, а не наоборот. Только что мне написали что мошенники опять хотели взять деньги с подписчицы.
1. Работает 20 лет. Все 20 лет - чередование ночных и дневных смен. После ночной смены удается поспать 2-3 часа.
2. Работа связана с постоянным стрессом. Думаю, объяснять почему - не надо.
3. Окружность талии 112 см. Абдоминальное ожирение.
4. Малоподвижность. Он не оперативник, которого «ноги кормят».
5. Тревога фоновая. Он тревожный человек и повышение АД воспринимает как угрозу инсульта. Имеет место «саморазгон АД…
На этой неделе был на консультации сотрудник органов правопорядка. С артериальной гипертонией. Неуправляемой.
Конечно же, я от него услышал, что врачи не могут найти причину. Проверял почки - ничего не нашлось.
Я назвал ему целых пять причин. Не утверждая, что они имеют равный вес и равный вклад.
Назвать причины?
Обратилась пациентка с фибрилляцией предсердий, у которой аритмия стала неуправляемой, и пароксизмы возникали несколько раз в неделю, что сильно снижало качество жизни.
Амиодарон в свое время вызвал осложнение (щитовидная железа). Соталол оказался неэффективен. Ранее принимала беталок ЗОК. Который (ожидаемо) тоже был неэффективен.
С этим она ко мне и приехала.
Результат хороший. Постучите по дереву (Шутка).
Вот такой пациент был недавно на консультации. Сразу сказал, что статины принимать не хочет, но слышал, что есть инъекции, снижающие уровень холестерина в крови.
У пациента - сухожильные ксантомы (отложения эфиров холестерина в сухожилиях), стенозы артерий до 50%.
А вы как считаете: хватит ли тут мощности кумабов или инклисирана, чтобы кардинально изменить ситуацию?
😱78🤔45❤8👀6👍5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @drzafiraki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Доктор Егоров @doctorilyaegorov · 33,122 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Dr.Anshina @DrAnshina · 398,031 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺 @blog_kardiologa · 137,186 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доктор В.К. Зафираки” (@drzafiraki), 19,177 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drzafiraki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.