Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +528. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,130–35,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 09:26
35,741
-6
4 Nov 2026, 07:26
35,747
+8
3 Nov 2026, 07:19
35,739
+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:49
35,737
+2
1 Nov 2026, 11:01
35,735
-1
30 Oct 2026, 09:56
35,736
-4
29 Oct 2026, 11:58
35,740
-12
28 Oct 2026, 07:30
35,752
-3
26 Oct 2026, 12:59
35,755
+12
25 Oct 2026, 12:46
35,743
-13
24 Oct 2026, 10:15
35,756
+3
23 Oct 2026, 12:36
35,753
-8
22 Oct 2026, 10:30
35,761
+1
21 Oct 2026, 05:47
35,760
-4
20 Oct 2026, 06:58
35,764
-2
19 Oct 2026, 09:18
35,766
+3
18 Oct 2026, 12:00
35,763
+43
17 Oct 2026, 12:46
35,720
+18
16 Oct 2026, 12:35
35,702
-9
15 Oct 2026, 10:46
35,711
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 35,741 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,020
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.822%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
125 (20 June 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
80,173
Reactions total
659
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 16s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,527 reactions across 119 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,603
89.2%
👍
254
2.98%
🙏
204
2.39%
👏
183
2.15%
🥰
130
1.52%
😢
68
0.797%
🔥
48
0.563%
🤩
22
0.258%
👎
10
0.117%
🎉
5
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,527 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (36.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅زندگی شبیه یک برگه امتحانه؛
مهم فقط این نیست که چه سؤالی جلوی ما قرار گرفته، مهم اینه چه کسی داره به اون سؤال پاسخ میده.
آدم معمولی وسط درد، طلاق، ترس، خیانت یا شکست گم میشه؛اما آدم خودآگاه میپرسه:
«نکته پنهان این اتفاق برای من چیه؟
این درد قراره چه چیزی رو در من بیدار کنه؟» 🌱
آگاهی یعنی وسط هر سؤال زندگی، فقط دنبال جواب بیرونی نباشی.خودت رو هم پیدا کنی.و یادت نره؛حتی اگر در بعضی امتحانهای زندگی نمره دلخواهت رو …
همریشه ارزشمندم درود🍃
این جشن، جلسه صفرِ چهلمین دوره جامع خودآگاهی بود؛ آموزشهای اصلی هنوز شروع نشده و فرصت همراه شدن با ما باقیه.
دلم میخواد قبل از شروع این مسیر، تو هم این تجربه رو ببینی.
فیلم کامل جشن:
https://t.me/drbitahosseinibot?start=cmd_489427871
همریشهء عزیزم
جشن مقدماتی و جلسه صفرِ چهلمین دوره جامع خودآگاهی، خودشکوفایی و خودفراروی همین حالا در حال برگزاریه! ✨
امروز هنوز آغاز آموزشهای اصلی نیست؛ قراره کنار هم، نقطه شروع یک مسیر تازه رو تجربه کنیم.
از هر کجای دنیا که هستی، تو هم مهمون جشنمون باش.
🎥 تماشای زنده مراسم از لینک زیر:
👇
https://survey.porsline.ir/s/9TtcODW6
🔖و رسیدیم به جلسه آخر
جایی که فهمیدیم ملیکا، تمام این مدت همینجا کنار ما بوده؛شنیده، گریه کرده، گذشتهاش را دوباره ورق زده و در آخر، برگشته و گفته:
«میشنومت رو دوباره برگردون.»
ملیکایی که روزی با زخمهای خودش وارد اتاق درمان شد، امروز روانشناسی شده که همان زخمها را میشناسد و به آدمهای دیگری کمک میکند از آنها عبور کنند.و شاید زیباترین پایان برای قصه ملیکا همین باشد:
این قصه تمام نشد؛
تبدیل شد به شروع دوبارهی …
🔖همه ما میدونیم درد و رنج پیغامی برامون داره؛ اما نکته خیلی مهم اینجاست که ما خیلی وقتها پیغامی رو که در دل درد و رنج وجود داره، اشتباه میفهمیم.
میدونی چرا؟
چون این مقدار آگاهی واقعی درون ماست که میتونه درد و رنج رو معنا کنه؛ نه کتابهایی که خوندیم و چیزهایی که فقط در سطح دانستگی بلدیم.
هرچقدر آگاهیمون کمتر باشه، صدای درد و رنج رو خشنتر و پر از تنبیه معنا میکنیم.و هرچقدر آگاهی درونمون گستردهتر و وسیعتر با…
درود همریشه عزیز 🌱🤍
برای دریافت هدیهی روز دختر،به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید.✨👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
https://t.me/drbitahosseinibot?start=cmd_834380671
📌 اگر لینک براتون باز نشد،کافیه اون رو کپی کنید و در قسمت جستوجوی تلگرام پیست(paste)کنید تا بتونید وارد ربات بشید. 🌱
🎼🎼🎼محرمانههای اتاق درمان | قسمت سیزدهم
🔖 ملیکا؛ ملکهی یخی | پارت دهم
«پس من هیچ تغییری نکردم...»
ملیکا این جمله رو درست زمانی گفت که تغییرات مهمی کرده بود؛ اما برگشتنِ یک رفتار قدیمی کافی بود تا یکدفعه تمام راهی رو که آمده بود، نبیند.
🍃همریشه جانم، یکی از جاهای سختِ مسیر تغییر همینجاست. ممکنه مدتها روی خودت کار کرده باشی، خیلی چیزها رو فهمیده باشی و جور دیگری زندگی کرده باشی، اما یک روز دوباره یخ بزنی، فرار کن…
❤72🥰2🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @drbitahosseini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@drbitahosseini edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @drbitahosseini as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بزرگترین تفاوت یک انسان معمولی با یک انسان «فرارفته» در مواجهه با طوفانهای زندگی چیست؟
تلاش میکنند تمام دنیا و آدمها را به نفع خود تغییر دهند.7%
«قدرتِ حذفِ» اضافات، شکایتها و هیاهوی ذهنی را دارند.70%
با سرسختی بیوقفه میجنگند و هرگز غمگین نمیشوند.11%
رنج و درد کمتری را در زندگی تجربه میکنند.17%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
چرا ما گاهی در روابط و انتخابهایمان احساس میکنیم در یک «چرخه تکراری» گیر افتادهایم❓ انگار داریم همان دردهای قدیمی را با آدمهای جدید تجربه میکنیم. به نظر تو دلیل اصلی چیست❓
شانس بد در انتخاب آدمها3%
دنیا همیشه قرار است ما را با چالشهای مشابه روبرو کند9%
طرف مقابل تغییر کرده و دیگر آن آدم اولی نیست3%
ناخودآگاهِ ما به دنبال تکرارِ زخمهای کودکی است88%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
به نظر تو چرا بعضی زوجها بارها سر یک موضوعِ ظاهراً ساده دعوا میکنند❓
در پستهای بعدی دقیقتر میبینیم چرا بعضی بحثها تمام نمیشوند.
چون یکی از آنها واقعاً لجباز است5%
چون زیر آن دعوا، یک نیاز یا ترسِ شنیدهنشده پنهان شده79%
چون رابطهشان سرد شده و بهانهای برای بحث پیدا میشود6%
چون هنوز درباره آن موضوع به توافق نرسیدهاند18%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
پادکستهای مجتبیشکوری @drmojtaba_shakoori · 63,677 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DrBitaHosseini” (@drbitahosseini), 35,741 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drbitahosseini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
