Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 31 days, net +732. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,997–25,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 20:38
24,435
+3,780
7 Sept 2026, 23:00
20,655
-1,270
4 Sept 2026, 22:20
21,925
-582
3 Sept 2026, 06:44
22,507
-412
2 Sept 2026, 01:04
22,919
-190
1 Sept 2026, 02:18
23,109
-232
31 Aug 2026, 02:56
23,341
-208
30 Aug 2026, 00:12
23,549
-258
29 Aug 2026, 03:37
23,807
-336
28 Aug 2026, 01:53
24,143
-316
27 Aug 2026, 01:56
24,459
-223
26 Aug 2026, 00:22
24,682
-180
25 Aug 2026, 00:18
24,862
-180
23 Aug 2026, 09:25
25,042
+2,858
21 Aug 2026, 21:36
22,184
-192
20 Aug 2026, 18:03
22,376
-117
19 Aug 2026, 14:28
22,493
-203
18 Aug 2026, 13:22
22,696
-140
17 Aug 2026, 10:13
22,836
-254
15 Aug 2026, 16:46
23,090
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.48%
avg views ÷ 24,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
80 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
73,584
Reactions total
2,865
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 08s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,975 reactions across 80 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,762
69.5%
❤🔥
404
10.2%
👍
249
6.26%
🤣
244
6.14%
💔
121
3.04%
😁
43
1.08%
🤬
28
0.704%
🙏
25
0.629%
👏
16
0.403%
😭
15
0.377%
🐳
11
0.277%
🕊
9
0.226%
😍
9
0.226%
👌
8
0.201%
🔥
8
0.201%
😢
6
0.151%
👀
3
0.075%
😘
2
0.05%
😱
2
0.05%
🤔
2
0.05%
8 further kinds
8
0.201%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,975 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دوستان حتما به این پیام توجه کنید...
این کانال و کانال های مشابه و پیج های اینستاگرامی که با عکس من فعال هستن و قول سود ثابت میدن، همگی کلاهبردار هستن...
به هیچ عنوان اعتماد نکنید!!!
آخه کی ۲۰۰ دلار رو تو ۷۲ ساعت ۸ برابر میکنه که شما بخواید باور کنید و پول دستش بدید؟؟
نه خودم و نه تیمم هیچوقت از هیچ عزیزی سرمایه قبول نمیکنیم.
سود ثابت یعنی کلاهبرداری، حالا با هر اسم و برای هرکی باشه....
⚠️⚠️
@ecobehrang1
تتر (دلار) به محدوده ۲۱۷.۵۰۰ رسیده...
تقریبا از ۲۱۲ هزار تومن قیمت حباب مثبت داره و بالا رفتن قیمت همراه با پایین اومدن حجم خرید داره اتفاق میافته...
این الان به معنی نقد شدنه ؟
قطعا نه...
برای دوستان نوسان گیر یک پله کوچیک تاکید میکنم بین ۱۰ تا ۱۵ درصد سیو سود رو محدوده ۲۱۹ تا ۲۲۲ تومن منطقیه.
برای دوستانی که از خرید جا موندن هم روی چارت ۳ پله خرید رو مشخص کردم.
۲۰۴ تا ۲۰۵ _ ۱۹۸ تا ۱۹۷ _ ۱۸۸ تا ۱۹۰
پ.ن: …
سال ۸۶ ... ترمی ۴۰۰ هزار تومن شهریه دانشگاه میدادم میدادم، یعنی کمتر از ۲ دلار امروز...
همون سال ۸۶ با ماهی ۲۰۰ هزار تومن زندگی دانشجویی عالی داشتم، یعنی کمتر از ۱ دلار امروز...
عجیب اینه که فقط ۳۷ سالمه و تحریم ها هم فقط کاغذ پاره بود...
✍️ بهرنگ رسولی
@ecobehrang1
استراتژی و road map...
و نکته مهم درک پتانسیل بازارهای مالی برای سرمایه گذاری و کسب درآمد از سرمایه...
همیشه تو هر تصمیم مالی چه سرمایه گذاری و چه ترید به درصد سود و زیان توجه کنید..!!
۵۰ دلار سود برای سرمایه صد دلاری عالیه اما برای سرمایه هزار دلاری کافی نیست.
ویس رو حتما گوش کنید تو تصمیمات مالی کمکتون میکنه...
حمایت و انرژی های شما مثل همیشه حالم رو خوب میکنه.
ارادت ❤️
@ecobehrang1
این هفته در مجموع ۷ معامله داشتیم:
✖️ یک استاپ ۴۵ پیپ (لایو ترید) ✖️
✅️ ۶ معامله سود ده ✅️
✅️ معامله اول تک تارگت ۴۰ پیپ سود
✅️ معامله دوم دو تارگت ۱۱۰ پیپ سود
✅️ معامله سوم تک تارگت ۵۰ پیپ سود
✅️ معامله چهارم دو تارگت ۱۱۰ پیپ سود
✅️ معامله پنجم ۵ تارگت ۴۱۰ پیپ سود که در برآیند ۴ تارگت و ۲۸۰ پیپ سود محاسبه خواهد شد.
✅️ معامله ششم ۵ تارگت ۳۸۰ پیپ سود که در برآیند ۴ تارگت و ۲۲۰ پیپ سود محاسبه خواهد شد.…
طولانی شد اما گوش کنید.
همه جوانب طلا و دلار رو براتون بررسی کردم.
کدوم نواحی برای خرید طلا و نوسان گیری طلا مناسبه ..؟
حمایت کنید بدونم گوش میکنید.
@ecobehrang1
طلای جهانی هفته رو زیر 4500 دلار (4454 دلار) و با اصلاح هفتگی ۳.۵٪ به پایان رسونده.
نواحی که پتانسیل برگشت یا ری اکشن قیمتی طلای جهانی رو دارن رو روی عکس مشخص کردم.
توضیح کامل تر و تحلیل طلا و دلار( تتر) رو الان تو یه ویس میفرستم براتون...
@ecobehrang1
✍️ اثر تورمی بنزین...
با افزایش قیمت بنزین تو کشور که این بار مرحله به مرحله داره اجرایی میشه...
به زودی موج تورمی جدیدی رو پیش رو خواهیم داشت، با اینکه همین الان تورم اعلامی خود آقایون نزدیک به ۹۰ درصده، با افزایش قیمت بنزین دوباره حداقل ۲۰ تا ۳۰ درصد افزایش نرخ تورم رو در تمامی بخش ها پیش رو خواهیم داشت.
مهمتر از اون بعد از تجربه سال ۹۸ سر گرونی بنزین...
مردم بعد از این اتفاق تجربه کردن که تو این شرایط بهتره ب…
نرخ سوم بنزین...
پرزیدنت پزشکیان :
نرخ سوم قیمت بنزین پس از هماهنگی با همه نهادها و ارگانها از ۵ هزار تومان به ۱۰ هزار تومان خواهد رسید.
@ecobehrang1
🤬19👍14
Signed Behrang Rasouli
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @ecobehrang1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تا حالا سراغ پروژه های سود ثابت مثل FNDK رفتید..؟ صادقانه جواب بدید لطفا
بله سودمم برداشت کردم6%
بله اما پول خودمم نتونستم بکشم بیرون7%
نه میدونم که منطقی نیست و پانزیه87%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💎 خانوادهِ میثاق 💎 @misaghtrade · 84,675 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
قبیله ققنوس|ترید با هوشمصنوعی🤖❤️🔥 @sokoon1111 · 442,202 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
بیدار شو ! @adwakeup · 43,922 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
📊آرش نقی پور 📈📉(Rook Trade) @rooktrade · 45,632 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
سیگنال کریپتو و فارکس عمومی ققنوس ❤️🔥 @adam3 · 94,111 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
آکادمی سرمایهگذاری گلشنی @rezagolshaniinvest · 47,070 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
پولسازی محمّد بصیری گروه52💚 @basiri7 · 85,287 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
Coinlocally Community @Coinlocally · 70,312 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
رنه سینانی @renesinaniofficial · 230,903 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
📈 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝘇𝗮𝗱 𝗩𝗮𝗷𝗶𝗵𝗶 @FarzadVajihi · 106,140 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
MatinMental @matinmentalofficial · 45,594 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
EcoKhavand | اکوخاوند @eco_khavand · 120,501 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
MAYAESLAMIIIIⓂ️💙 @mayaeslamiiii · 40,748 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
JAVIDAN @javidan · 34,163 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eco Behrang | اکو بهرنگ” (@ecobehrang1), 24,435 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecobehrang1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.