Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JAVIDAN

Channel

JAVIDAN

@javidan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,651subscribers

-1,773 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410275311
TypeChannel
Username@javidan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/javidan

Growth

34,65136,42435,537.56 August 2026 — 36,424 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,424 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,423 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,310 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,205 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,097 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,884 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,769 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,666 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,638 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,273 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,057 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,914 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,818 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,751 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,667 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,491 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,326 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,253 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,158 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,080 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,989 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,923 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,853 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34,787 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,702 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34,651 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 27 days, net -1,773. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,385–36,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:2834,651-51
1 Sept 2026, 08:4434,702-85
31 Aug 2026, 05:1534,787-66
30 Aug 2026, 07:1234,853-70
29 Aug 2026, 08:5734,923-66
28 Aug 2026, 09:5634,989-91
27 Aug 2026, 10:2735,080-78
26 Aug 2026, 08:3435,158-95
25 Aug 2026, 12:0235,253-73
24 Aug 2026, 11:3635,326-165
22 Aug 2026, 20:2535,491-176
21 Aug 2026, 08:5435,667-84
20 Aug 2026, 11:4235,751-67
19 Aug 2026, 13:2235,818-96
18 Aug 2026, 14:1435,914-143
17 Aug 2026, 13:3336,057-216
16 Aug 2026, 04:0736,273+635
14 Aug 2026, 14:5635,638-28
13 Aug 2026, 02:5835,666-103
12 Aug 2026, 02:5235,769first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.69%
avg views ÷ 34,651 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held59 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total126,490
Reactions total1,442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,610 reactions across 53 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,37885.6%
774.78%
👎754.66%
🔥674.16%
💔130.807%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 59 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @javidan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC≈1,210 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026

https://youtu.be/tJbzMqJGH4k?is=Ef1Pzac7vHJdAJWa

9🔥3👎2

28 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC≈1,290 views22 reactionsread 1 September 2026

چه سمی بود جی تی ای

17👎3🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,900 views60 reactionsread 1 September 2026

یا صفر یا ۱۰۰

3317👎5🔥5

25 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈2,240 views88 reactionsread 1 September 2026

نفس عمیق ک.. ننش

6910🔥6👎2💔1

24 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈2,630 views73 reactionsread 1 September 2026

مدتی هست گم شدی؟ مدتی هست از کاغذ ‌و قلم به دوری؟ نزدیک شو پیدا میشی

60🔥9👎4

24 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC≈2,700 views56 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

512🔥2👎1

23 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈2,870 views70 reactionsread 1 September 2026

اگر ایرادی در سازمان من وجود دارد ایراد از من است اگر این‌طور نیست پس احتمالاً رهبر کس دیگری‌ست پیداش کن و بگو: چشم اگر مسئولیت عواقب با رهبر است اطاعت تو واجب است

59🔥53👎3

22 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC≈2,730 views74 reactionsread 1 September 2026

کمال‌گرایی دشمن شروع است بد شروع کن اما شروع کن برای شروع اقدام‌گرا باش بعد از شروع، کمال‌گرا و صبور چون اگر بعد از شروع هم فقط اقدام کنی سریع حرکت می‌کنی، اما بی‌کیفیت می‌مانی

64🔥52👎2💔1

22 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,580 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

https://youtu.be/3oCx6HcYz9k?is=8FqQiMyyZRq5dSX8

8🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC≈3,130 views55 reactionsread 1 September 2026

تاب آوری فردات محصول فشار امروز دیروز راحت تر خم میشدی پس فردا…

531👎1

17 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC≈3,360 views26 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Be grateful and appreciative Set your expectations high But your effort should always be greater than your expectations If your expectations are pointlessly greater than your effort, you will burn in the hell of delusion and misery Know that making no mistakes is the product of standing still Don’t be afraid and move

241👎1

17 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC≈3,100 views72 reactions37 Starsread 1 September 2026

قدرشناس و قدردان باش توقعاتت رو بزرگ کن اما تلاشت همیشه باید بزرگ‌تر از توقعاتت باشد اگر توقعاتت بیخودی بزرگ‌تر از تلاشت باشد در جهنم توهم و بدبختی خواهی سوخت بدان که اشتباه نکردن محصول سکون است نترس و حرکت کن

692👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @javidan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTCAnonymous Poll252 voters

تو کدومی؟

  1. مسائل ساده رو پیچیده میکنم24%
  2. مسائل پیچیده رو ساده میکنم32%
  3. مسائل پیچیده رو میکنم17%
  4. مسائل ساده رو میکنم13%
  5. مسائل ساده منو پیچیده میکنند15%
  6. مسائل پیچیده منو ساده میکنند8%
  7. تازه معنای درست دوتای اول رو فهمیدم12%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 792,890 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بیدار شو !
@adwakeup · 44,011
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
هوش مالی (ماهان تیموری)
@hooshemaliii · 85,546
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
قبیله ققنوس‌|ترید با‌ هوش‌مصنوعی🤖❤️‍🔥
@sokoon1111 · 230,975
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
MatinMental
@matinmentalofficial · 45,592
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
آکادمی سرمایه‌گذاری گلشنی
@rezagolshaniinvest · 47,550
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
رنه سینانی
@renesinaniofficial · 229,800
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
📊آرش نقی پور 📈📉(Rook Trade)
@rooktrade · 45,723
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JAVIDAN” (@javidan), 34,651 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/javidan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.