Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +857. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,374–22,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:08
22,418
-4
5 Nov 2026, 05:56
22,422
-4
4 Nov 2026, 06:37
22,426
+11
3 Nov 2026, 04:56
22,415
-3
2 Nov 2026, 02:19
22,418
-7
1 Nov 2026, 04:29
22,425
-7
31 Oct 2026, 02:59
22,432
+5
30 Oct 2026, 03:47
22,427
+21
29 Oct 2026, 02:36
22,406
+15
28 Oct 2026, 02:56
22,391
-1
27 Oct 2026, 03:47
22,392
-2
26 Oct 2026, 07:09
22,394
-2
25 Oct 2026, 05:26
22,396
-5
24 Oct 2026, 08:34
22,401
-26
23 Oct 2026, 09:00
22,427
-10
22 Oct 2026, 08:46
22,437
-24
20 Oct 2026, 22:56
22,461
-24
19 Oct 2026, 18:00
22,485
-23
18 Oct 2026, 14:36
22,508
+2
17 Oct 2026, 17:00
22,506
first reading
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.67%
avg views ÷ 22,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
95 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
58,452
Reactions total
1,004
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36m 01s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,731 reactions across 95 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,708
62.5%
👍
338
12.4%
🥰
172
6.30%
👏
171
6.26%
👌
115
4.21%
🔥
91
3.33%
💋
41
1.50%
💯
26
0.952%
😘
17
0.622%
🎉
14
0.513%
😍
13
0.476%
💊
5
0.183%
🤗
5
0.183%
💘
3
0.11%
🤩
3
0.11%
😈
2
0.073%
🤯
2
0.073%
🫡
2
0.073%
⚡
1
0.037%
👀
1
0.037%
1 further kind
1
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,731 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (6.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎬 جادوی گراف در اینشات؛ تفاوت یک ادیت معمولی با یک ادیت حرفهای!
تا حالا دقت کردی چرا حرکت بعضی ویدیوها اینقدر نرم، روان و جذابه؟ 😍
یکی از رازهای این زیبایی، استفاده از Graph (گراف) یا منحنی کنترل حرکته.
با گراف میتونی:
✨ سرعت حرکت رو کنترل کنی.
✨ ورود و خروج سوژهها رو نرمتر کنی.
✨ زوم و جابهجاییها رو حرفهایتر انجام بدی.
✨ به انیمیشنها حس طبیعی و جذابتری ببخشی.
📌 قراره در مجموعه آموزشهای ادیت امپرور، گ…
🚀 نسخه جدید پیکسآرت آنلاک منتشر شد!
اگه به طراحی و ویرایش عکس با موبایل علاقهمندی، این نسخه میتونه ابزارهای جذابتری در اختیارت قرار بده. 😍
✨ با پیکسآرت میتونی:
🔹 عکسهات رو حرفهایتر ویرایش کنی.
🔹 طراحیهای خلاقانه انجام بدی.
🔹 از ابزارهای متنوع ادیت و افکت استفاده کنی.
🔹 ایدههات رو به طرحهای جذاب تبدیل کنی.
🎓 دوره آموزشی پیکسآرت هم در مجموعه ادیت امپرور برگزار میشه!
شرکت در دوره آموزشی:
@haddadi_editor…
🎬 جادوی حرکت با گراف (Graph / Ease / Curve)
تا حالا برات سؤال شده چرا بعضی ویدئوها حرکتهای نرم، حرفهای و چشمنوازی دارن؟ 😍
یکی از رازهای این حرکتها استفاده از گراف یا منحنی حرکت در کیفریمهاست.
گراف به ما اجازه میده سرعت و شتاب حرکتها رو کنترل کنیم؛ یعنی مشخص کنیم یک حرکت چطور شروع بشه، چطور ادامه پیدا کنه و چطور به پایان برسه.
✨ نتیجه؟
حرکتهای نرمتر، طبیعیتر، حرفهایتر و جذابتر!
📌 قراره در مجموعه ادیت…
🔥 اینشات جدید( آبان ۱۴۰۵ ) 🔥
🔸نسخه فوق العاده با ۳ قابلیت خاص🔸
برای نصب (اگر آپدیت نشد) باید اینشات قبلی را حذف کنی فقط:
🛑حتما و حتما داده ها را پاک کن ،
با پاککردن داده ها، فونت ها و پروژه های نیمه تمامت حذف میشن
⛔️موقع حذف اینشات یک پیغام میاد که نوشته :
🔸داده ها نگهداری شوند🔸
❌نباید اونوتیک بزنی⚡⚡⚡
تمام فونتها و پروژه های نیمه کاره در درافت حذف میشن.
حالا میتونی اینشات جدید را نصب کنی
قابلیت های این اینش…
🎨 میخوای برای پیجت یک هویت بصری حرفهای بسازی؟
@editempror
با این پرامپت رایگان هوش مصنوعی، میتونی برای پیجت ایده بگیری و رنگبندی، فونت، سبک طراحی و قالب پست و استوریهات رو منسجمتر کنی! 🤩
📌 فقط کافیه از صفحه اصلی پیجت اسکرینشات بگیری و همراه پرامپت به هوش مصنوعی بدی.
🎁 میخوای پرامپت کامل و رایگان رو دریافت کنی؟
یه لایک بزن ❤️ و از این لینک دریافتش کن:
روی متن ضربه بزنید👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
دریافت پرامپت هویت پیج
روی…
سرفصلهای اصلی دوره جامع آموزش اینشات | EditEmpror
🎬 آموزش صفر تا صد اینشات؛ از آشنایی با ابزارها تا اجرای پروژههای عملی
۱. آشنایی با اینشات و ابزارهای آن
- معرفی اپلیکیشن اینشات و قابلیتهای آن
- معرفی و آموزش کاربردی تمام ابزارهای اینشات
- آموزش کامل بخشهای مختلف برنامه و نحوه استفاده از آنها
۲. آموزش ویرایش حرفهای ویدئو
- آموزش کاتاوت (Cutout) و کروماکی (Chroma Key)
- آموزش افکتها، فیلترها و ترنزیشنها
…
❤4💘3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @editempror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @editempror as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگه فقط ۳۰ دقیقه وقت داشته باشی برای ادیت کدومو اول انجام میدی؟
کات و مرتب کردن ویدیو87%
رنگ و افکت ها16%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگه بخوای با یکی از این دوتا ادیت کنی کدومو انتخاب میکنی؟؟
گوشی87%
کامپیوتر15%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دوره اموزشی رایگانمون دوس دارید اموش کدوم آپ باشه؟
کپ کات44%
اینشات65%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مهندس شاینا امیری | Shaina Amiri @shaina_amiri · 46,965 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
•• متن های زیبا •• @matn_ziba20 · 26,432 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اینشات ، کپکات ، آموزش تولیدمحتوا | ادیت امپرور” (@editempror), 22,418 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editempror.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.