Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gentle_Psy_Doc

Channel

Gentle_Psy_Doc

@gentlepsydoc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,137subscribers

+189 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702262718
TypeChannel
Username@gentlepsydoc
Created10 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gentlepsydoc

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,92813,13713,032.55 August 2026 — 12,948 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,948 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,942 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,931 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,928 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,931 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,933 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,942 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,941 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,938 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,941 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,948 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,947 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,956 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,967 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,970 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,972 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,973 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,976 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,979 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,990 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,992 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,996 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,015 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,048 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,067 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,118 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,137 subscribers5 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 45 days, net +189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,897–13,168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:5513,137+19
16 Sept 2026, 21:5913,118+51
14 Sept 2026, 22:1713,067+19
13 Sept 2026, 09:5413,048+33
11 Sept 2026, 11:5813,015+19
8 Sept 2026, 18:5512,996+4
5 Sept 2026, 14:5612,992+2
3 Sept 2026, 15:4112,990+11
2 Sept 2026, 05:2212,979+3
1 Sept 2026, 06:1412,976-1
31 Aug 2026, 08:3612,977+4
30 Aug 2026, 05:2812,973+1
29 Aug 2026, 08:0312,972+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:5512,970+3
27 Aug 2026, 11:1312,967+11
26 Aug 2026, 08:4512,956+9
25 Aug 2026, 09:5412,947-1
22 Aug 2026, 15:4212,948-2
21 Aug 2026, 08:4712,950+9
20 Aug 2026, 08:2212,941first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 13,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held28 (23 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total8,350
Reactions total255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,239 reactions across 27 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,17652.5%
🔥42418.9%
👍28412.7%
💯944.20%
❤‍🔥672.99%
👏452.01%
🙏220.983%
🤔200.893%
🤝180.804%
😨170.759%
😱150.67%
😢140.625%
100.447%
👌100.447%
👀60.268%
🍓30.134%
💔30.134%
🤮30.134%
🆒20.089%
🤬20.089%
4 further kinds40.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,450 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

Актуальные рекомендации по ОКР от CANMAT 2025 года Глобально изменения минимальные, все так же СИОЗС, кломипрамин, арипипразол, рисперидон - основные препараты Несколько изменений, которые лично мне показались важными: 1. Галоперидол - переведен в первую линию аугментации, аргумент - доступность в странах с низких доходом, проблема одного маленького исследования и побочных никуда не делась, дело в фармакоэкономике

47👍245

31 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈1,850 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Витамин B6 при акатизии: откуда взялась «первая линия» и что там на самом деле? Встретил утверждение на одном из каналов по психиатрии, что пиридоксин (витамин B6) 600–1200 мг/сут — первая линия при акатизии, вызванной антипсихотиками. Сильно удивился, поискал откуда вдруг такое утверждение. Данные про витамин В6 и акатизию мне известны, но вот откуда вдруг первая линия - было непонятно. Выяснилось, что это утвер

❤‍🔥2825👍10👏1

25 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈5,050 views115 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Проблема современных классификаций психических расстройств Диагноз, как известно, ставится по соответствию критериям. Возьмем для примера депрессию (принимаем, что другие диагнозы типа биполярного расстройства исключены для простоты иллюстрации). Вот два пациента: 1) Пациентка А, 52 года - Последние два месяца — стойко сниженное настроение, хуже по утрам, «внутри всё сжато, как камень». - Просыпается в 4 утра и

67🔥29❤‍🔥19

21 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈3,330 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Напоминание - лекция на тему мифов об антидепрессантах 11 сентября https://t.me/gentlepsydoc/812

19🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈4,430 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Пациент на ламотриджине пропустил несколько дней приёма. Что делать? Клиническая ситуация - пациент стабильно принимает 200-400 мг ламотриджина 2 месяца и более, пропустил несколько дней приема (уехал без таблеток, решил попробовать не принимать почему-то, забыл рецепт и тд). Можно ли просто продолжить ту же дозу? Российская инструкция (так же, как и FDA) говорит следующее: - чем больше прошло времени после по

51👍11🤔4🔥31

19 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈3,030 views62 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Как исследования влияют на выбор терапии в клинической практике? Интересно, что вчерашний пост многие специалисты расценили как оправдание назначению препаратов без доказанной эффективности. Хотя там вообще ни слова про это - текст про понимание того, как работает научный подход в оценке эффективности препаратов- сложнее, чем черное-белое. А клинические решения о терапии- это совершенно отдельная тема. Базовый п

40👍11💯11

18 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,670 views148 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Не доказано = неэффективно? Нередко вижу в постах коллег и комментариях к ним примерно такое: «этот препарат неэффективен при таком-то состоянии, так как не изучен в исследованиях/недоказан». Звучит как будто про доказательную медицину. На деле — ровно наоборот. Доказательная медицина — по сути научно обоснованная медицина. А в науке дихотомия «доказан = помогает, недоказан = не помогает» — странное явление: реаль

74💯33🔥23👍10👏6🙏2

6 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC≈4,510 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Короткие посты в отпуске FDA впервые одобрила устройство для терапии депрессии, которое можно применять дома. ProlivRx- стимулирует постоянным током ветви тройничного и затылочного нервов, что в свою очередь, модулирует активность таламо-кортикальной и лимбической системы. Понятно, что это предполагаемый механизм действия, точности тут нет. Регистрация на основании клинического исследования: 124 участника, акти

🔥2918🤔4👍3🤓1

29 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC≈5,130 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Короткие посты в отпуске. Новость: Центанафадин - тройной ингибитор обратного захвата моноаминов- одобрен FDA для терапии РДВГ(давайте уже перейдем на этот перевод, он точнее). На самом деле соотношение аффинностей у центанафадина сильно смещено в сторону NET (порядка 1:6:14 для NE:DA:5-HT in vitro), поэтому тройной ингибитор несколько больше маркетинг, чем реальность. Проблема- размер эффекта ниже, чем у стандар

24👍17👀6

28 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈4,470 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Продолжение коротких постов в отпуске. Ещё одно исследование с моим участием: Несуицидальное самоповреждающее поведение у студентов российских вузов: результаты онлайн-анкетирования 3925 человек Для оценки применялась шкала ISAS Основные результаты - самоповреждения у 29.3 процентов, чаще всего цель- регуляция аффекта. Распространенность большая, конечно, это не значит, что у трети опрошенных это регулярный патт

😨17😢14👍74💔21👏1

27 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC≈3,990 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @cbt_info

Друзья, некоторое время назад я принял участие в передаче «Встал вопрос», где у нас состоялись бурные дебаты с психоаналитиком Андреем Рассохиным на тему, нужна ли краткосрочная или долгосрочная психотерапия. Надо сказать, что дебаты были очень острые. Я бы даже сказал, атмосфера была накаленной) Позиция Андрея заключалась в том, что краткосрочная терапия только убирает симптомы, которые потом обязательно вернутся, в

🔥4426👍11🤮3👏2🤔2💯1

27 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC≈3,820 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

На мой взгляд важные дебаты на тему психотерапии, как минимум услышать аргументы разных сторон. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pltEGP6IO7o&ra=m

🔥106👍2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @gentlepsydoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀
@krasikovAlexey · 41,248
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 40,070
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Шура-док
@schura_doc · 25,537
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Федоренко Павел | Тревога FM
@szmclub · 32,541
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Доктор Сычев
@dr_sychev · 49,159
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Психиатрия & Нейронауки
@psy_and_neuro · 22,280
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Пей таблетки! | MedIQLab
@mediq · 65,896
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Занимательная эндокринология
@funwithmedicine · 22,699
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,817
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Доктор Галеева
@doctor_galeeva · 28,614
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова
@myshlenie_kurpatov · 43,270
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Юрист для врача Ангелина Романовская
@mfcexpert_news · 29,548
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог ХАРИТОНОВ Андрей Геннадьевич
@ag_kharitonov · 58,905
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gentle_Psy_Doc” (@gentlepsydoc), 13,137 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gentlepsydoc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.