GoMining — Mine Bitcoin. Use Bitcoin. All in one app.
GoMining makes Bitcoin mining simple for everyone, whether you're just starting out or you've been in crypto for years.
Official links: https://link3.to/gmt_token
Created
Between 1 November 2018 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
111 measurements spanning 61 days, net +7,305. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82,942–92,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 111
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 22:01
91,343
+26
5 Oct 2026, 16:21
91,317
+4
5 Oct 2026, 02:59
91,313
+254
30 Sept 2026, 15:21
91,059
+35
29 Sept 2026, 22:55
91,024
+91
28 Sept 2026, 09:22
90,933
+561
18 Sept 2026, 05:58
90,372
-5
18 Sept 2026, 04:20
90,377
+33
17 Sept 2026, 19:59
90,344
+21
16 Sept 2026, 02:38
90,323
+2
15 Sept 2026, 23:37
90,321
+12
15 Sept 2026, 17:58
90,309
+38
14 Sept 2026, 10:40
90,271
+1
14 Sept 2026, 10:16
90,270
-1
14 Sept 2026, 04:02
90,271
+64
12 Sept 2026, 23:01
90,207
+10
12 Sept 2026, 19:00
90,197
+1
12 Sept 2026, 14:59
90,196
+64
10 Sept 2026, 23:41
90,132
+3
10 Sept 2026, 20:02
90,129
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.56%
avg views ÷ 91,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,080
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
65 (6 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
132,049
Reactions total
1,135
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,830
Videos
≈311
Links
≈2,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,313 reactions across 64 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,800
54.3%
👍
511
15.4%
🔥
398
12.0%
⚡
134
4.04%
🤔
125
3.77%
🎉
80
2.41%
🍾
74
2.23%
❤🔥
67
2.02%
🐳
35
1.06%
🏆
33
0.996%
💯
30
0.906%
😍
18
0.543%
🤩
8
0.241%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
202
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 64 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
42
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gomining. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧠 The quiz is back
GoMiners, you asked for it since Bounty days.
Wednesday, October 7, 17:00 UTC, in the @gomining_talking.
How it works:
• Three questions about GoMining, one after another, as quiz polls.
• Get all three right and you qualify. The first three to qualify win 5 GOMINING tokens each.
• One answer per question, no changing it. A wrong click knocks you out, so read before you tap.
• Nobody gets al…
⚡ GoBTC Pay backed a hackathon for the future of payments
AI agents are starting to buy things for us, and soon they'll pay each other for services too. Those payments are tiny, constant and cross-border, which is exactly what Bitcoin handles well and what card networks handle badly.
GoBTC Pay, built by GoMining, joined Agnic.AI's Agentic Commerce Pioneers hackathon as a Diamond Sponsor, with a dedicated track and …
The GOMINING token’s price crossed $0.40 today 🚀
The token’s main value lies in the utility it has within the GoMining ecosystem:
⭐ Lower maintenance costs. Pay maintenance for your Digital Miners in GOMINING and save up to 20% compared with other payment methods.
⭐ Lock GOMINING to get veGOMINING votes. The longer the lock, the more votes you get. Every week, 20% of newly minted GOMINING goes to vote holders, sha…
🎉 The VIP Referral Raffle results are in
First, the important part: 61 prize miners haven't been claimed yet. If you won, claim yours before October 31, 23:59 UTC. After that, the prize is gone.
👉 https://app.gomining.com/raffle/1a457879-4cff-4a44-b6d6-fceb317c87b4?utm_source=smm_telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=vip_raffle_results_02102026
How September went:
400+ referrers took part and collected almost 25…
📊Earn accounts vs staking vs yield farming: which one to choose?
There are 3 ways to put idle crypto to work, and each one pays you for carrying a different risk. Once you see which risk it is, the rate on the screen gets much easier to judge.
💎 Earn accounts. A platform holds your coins and does the work for you. It’s the simplest option, which is exactly why the platform’s financial health matters as much as its …
📊 Every reward, broken down
If you've ever looked at a daily reward and wondered how that number was reached, this release is for you.
Open any payout and go into the breakdown for each of your miners. Every line shows the formula and the numbers behind it:
⚡️ Electricity, priced off kilowatt-hours and your miner's efficiency
🛠 Service fee, with your discount as its own figure: VIP level, paying maintenance in GO…
🏆 #MinerWars Cycle 162 Digest
Cycle 162 closed — 986 rounds per league · ~$1.50M paid out.
💰 Pool: 12.540 BTC ($1,040,332) + 1,225,476 GOMINING ($457,347).
🆕 New clan, biggest reward.
777 entered MW for the first time and walked away with ~0.033 BTC + 1,007 GOMINING — top new-clan haul this cycle.
🎯 Most efficient caster.
꧁❦❀五極寒梅❀❦꧂ cast 1 spell for 1 GOMINING and took an x2 in Odyssey at block #968,550 — earned …
⚔️ Miner Wars: the new league structure goes live next week
GoMiners, the biggest change to Miner Wars since launch arrives on October 6, and the race for your place in it starts tomorrow. The cycle that begins tomorrow is the last one under the current structure, and where your clan finishes decides which league it starts in.
🏛️ A much wider ladder
There are 390 places above Dune instead of 150. Odyssey has 1 lea…
⏳ The VIP Referral Raffle ends soon
There’s still time to add more tickets before the draw.
Every $50 your referrals spend on miner purchases or power upgrades earns you 1 raffle ticket.
🎟️ More tickets = more chances
⛏️ 200 × 4 TH miners up for grabs
🏆 One person can win multiple miners
Already taking part? Keep building your ticket count while there’s still time.
Haven’t joined yet? Tap Take part — eligible re…
⚡ Honest guide to mining Bitcoin in 2026.
No setup, home or digital, escapes the two things that move rewards most: rising network difficulty and a falling BTC price.
And anyone promising fixed daily returns is the one to avoid. We wrote the guide minus the folklore.
https://gomining.com/blog/how-to-mine-bitcoin-a-beginners-guide
🏆 #MinerWars Cycle 161 Digest
Cycle 161 closed — 1024 rounds per league · ~$1.55M paid out.
💰 Pool: 13.285 BTC ($1,138,453) + 1,051,645 GOMINING ($408,669).
🆕 New clan, biggest reward.
samjack310 entered MW for the first time and walked away with ~0.030 BTC + 2,211 GOMINING — top new-clan haul this cycle.
🎯 Most efficient caster.
PrzyCinek cast 1 spell for 3.15 GOMINING and took an x4 in Odyssey at block #967,554…
⚡ Which Bitcoin mining pool should you actually join?
Shorter answer than most expect: ten pools now find over 90% of all blocks, so your pool choice barely moves how much BTC you earn. What it moves is the shape of your payments, when you get paid, who holds your coins, and how much goes to on-chain fees.
The real decision is the payout model:
• FPPS, steady income, the pool absorbs the luck
• PPLNS, lowest fees,…
❤24👍15⚡4
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @gomining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Fluence @fluence_official · 73,816 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
COCA News @coca_card · 19,720 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 September 2026
Whale by Wirex @whalebywirex · 67,044 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
moonasty @mooon_Nasty · 66,691 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Panda Roll 🐼🎋 Announcements @panda_roll_gg · 119,333 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Serge Hexn @SergeHexn · 496,370 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GoMining News” (@gomining), 91,343 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gomining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.