Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 37 days, net +174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,225–59,579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 17:42
59,520
-18
9 Sept 2026, 02:01
59,538
+22
5 Sept 2026, 16:37
59,516
+15
3 Sept 2026, 18:20
59,501
+19
2 Sept 2026, 10:04
59,482
+13
1 Sept 2026, 13:06
59,469
+22
31 Aug 2026, 13:08
59,447
+128
30 Aug 2026, 10:44
59,319
+10
29 Aug 2026, 08:13
59,309
-10
28 Aug 2026, 05:13
59,319
+39
27 Aug 2026, 04:28
59,280
-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:28
59,288
+6
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
59,282
+16
24 Aug 2026, 02:54
59,266
-4
22 Aug 2026, 11:58
59,270
-6
21 Aug 2026, 02:03
59,276
-7
19 Aug 2026, 23:42
59,283
-6
18 Aug 2026, 20:43
59,289
+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:55
59,288
-14
16 Aug 2026, 18:58
59,302
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.0%
avg views ÷ 59,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,900
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
35 (18 June 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
402,200
Reactions total
7,925
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,393 reactions across 34 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,165
52.2%
❤
5,582
26.1%
❤🔥
2,030
9.49%
🤣
1,605
7.50%
🎉
252
1.18%
👀
203
0.949%
😢
144
0.673%
💯
121
0.566%
😍
109
0.51%
🤝
94
0.439%
🙏
88
0.411%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 34 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grillhub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Доброе!
Под сериал можно заказать пиццу или наделать бутеров. А можно скрестить одно с другим.
Минимум заморочек, много сыра и начинки. Хватает примерно на 4 человек. Ну или на двоих очень уверенных в себе.
Погнали готовить 🔥
Видос уже на канале! 🔥
📺 Youtube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/zSYWV_sL8_w
📺 VK:
https://vk.ru/clip-95419678_456240709
📺RUTUBE:
https://rutube.ru/shorts/5091c760b2cdbb6d2044095c999845c8/
Сп…
Привет!
Сразу скажу: мы уже делали обзоры на «Красную цену», «365 дней», «Каждый день» и много других бюджетных продуктов. Казалось бы, нас уже сложно чем-то удивить…
Но ТАКОГО качества я, пожалуй, ещё не встречал.
В какой-то момент обзор превратился в проверку моего словарного запаса.
Столько мата я давно не запикивал. 😂
Но если без шуток — некоторые продукты реально вызывают очень много вопросов по составу, качест…
Привет!) Начинаем серию ностальгических рецептов и первым будет ТОП, это жареная картошка с салом по древнему рецепту от бабушки.
П.С. На фото реальный кадр, добавил только эффект подбрасывания...держу в курсе)
Видос уже на канале! 🔥
📺 Youtube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/Udb9YSFWRVM
📺 VK:
https://vk.ru/clip-95419678_456240707
📺RUTUBE:
https://rutube.ru/shorts/6baf8167a63c99ca89fb1b5ef3a819b4/
Спасибо за поддержк…
Доброе утро! Давно не трогали тему новинок из магазов, оказалось уйма всего нового. Тут и плагиат от роллтона на булдак...и закуски к пиву со вкусом колы...И еще много чего. В сентябре обязательно продолжим!
Приятного просмотра и апетита!
Спасибо за поддержку! ❤️
📱 Youtube:
https://youtu.be/ZfUQbnxTCFo
📱 VK:
https://vkvideo.ru/video-95419678_456240706
📺 RUTUBE:
https://rutube.ru/video/7058a9652ff39047c265b195adab…
Привет! Когда делал ремонт в студии, вообще не думал, что одна из главных фишек в итоге зайдёт не мне, а сыну…
Эта стена для него — натуральный YouTube без рекламы: можно залипать бесконечно 😂
Короче, ремонт делал для работы, а получилась волшебная стена для Тимохи. Кажется, главный зритель студии уже определился!)
Привет! 👋
Если варёные пельмени уже надоели, а жареные кажутся суховатыми — выкатываю свою любимую версию жареных пельменей на манер карбонары. Да простят меня итальянцы. Хотя после первого укуса, думаю, простят. 😄
По времени - минут 15.
По вкусу — почти ресторан.
По бюджету — без продажи почки.
Главное, возьмите нормальные пельмени, потому что плохие даже карбонара не отмоет от репутации.
Видос уже на канале! 🔥
…
Привет! Чижика в Питере нет, но я недавно был в Волгограде и Анюта сделала подборку на тему шашлыков из Чижика. Как и всегда не все так хорошо, но хорошие продукты есть! Надеюсь будет полезно.
Приятного просмотра и апетита!
Спасибо за поддержку! ❤️
📱 Youtube:
https://youtu.be/GhwjThGQ7OE
📱 VK:
https://vkvideo.ru/video-95419678_456240705
📺 RUTUBE:
https://rutube.ru/video/aace6528185e5f47cef18e3961a8e97b/
Доброе! 👋
Я тут для себя открыл офигевшую тему — супер хрустящий картофель фри. И вот без шуток: такой хруст в фастфуде ещё поискать надо.
Готовится всё максимально просто и довольно быстро!
Короче, метод крайне годный. Ребята, попробуйте — особенно если любите, когда фри именно ХРУСТИТ, а не грустно складывается пополам.
P.S. Прикладываю две фотки: одна с ИИ, вторая без. Чтобы вы понимали масштаб преступления — я …
-Ань, тут говорят я тебя не кормлю…
-Ок)
Если серьезно, за 4 месяца до родов поставили гестационный сахарный диабет, а за 2 месяца поставили холестас, так как ребенок передавил желчные протоки. Выписали сильные лекарства и капельницы…как следствие сильное похудение. Сейчас Анюта восстанавливается и вес набирает, все хорошо! Тимоха здоров как бык! Спасибо за заботу! Всех обняли!❤️
Доброе!
Натали собрала для нас подборку странных… хотя кого я обманываю — местами откровенно всратых продуктов с маркетплейсов.
Я такие форматы обожаю. Всегда интересно посмотреть, до чего дошла пищевая промышленность и в какой момент кто-то сказал: «Да, это точно надо продавать людям».
Приятного просмотра! 😄
Как вам вообще такая тема? Делать ещё выпуски со странной едой с маркетплейсов?
Спасибо за поддержку! ❤️
📱 …
❤306👍241🎉21❤🔥6👀6😢6😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @grillhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Привет!) Важнейший вопрос этого лета! ☀️
Какой холодный суп достоин звания «Спаситель в +30»? 😄
Окрошка на квасе33%
Окрошка на кефире12%
Холодник6%
Холодный борщ8%
Гаспачо4%
Пиво Ёпрст)37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ИТОГО:ШНАЯ @ratingfood · 88,189 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Егор Тарнакин @egortarnakin · 31,434 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
АХА ГОТОВИТ @axagotovit · 29,097 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Зона Лазерсона @lazerzona · 81,793 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
TBP Private @tebopi · 28,363 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Кухня с Акцентом @zuriskitchen · 56,880 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Шеф-повар Василий Емельяненко / Рецепты @chefvasiliy · 47,746 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Ведущий Фуд-блогер @foodblogger · 62,802 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Михеев и Павлов @miheevpavlov_pro · 183,878 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
James Alone Official Entertainment System @jamesaloneteam · 38,150 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Команда АП @KomandaAP · 145,543 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Рецепты Каждый День @topretsept · 222,557 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Независимый Эксперт @nexpertGM · 72,584 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 August 2026
CombatCrew 🚜 @combatcrew · 68,323 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GrillHub” (@grillhub), 59,520 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grillhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.