Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,927–4,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:21
4,935
-5
13 Sept 2026, 06:17
4,940
-5
9 Sept 2026, 09:56
4,945
-1
3 Sept 2026, 17:02
4,946
-2
31 Aug 2026, 07:35
4,948
-6
28 Aug 2026, 01:54
4,954
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:35
4,955
-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:07
4,956
-7
18 Aug 2026, 09:19
4,963
-5
15 Aug 2026, 03:39
4,968
-5
12 Aug 2026, 07:14
4,973
-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:13
4,978
-12
6 Aug 2026, 05:20
4,990
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:48
4,990
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,068 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
356
33.3%
💯
260
24.3%
🔥
98
9.18%
🍾
81
7.58%
❤
74
6.93%
😎
52
4.87%
👨💻
36
3.37%
🎉
31
2.90%
👌
25
2.34%
🙏
16
1.50%
🥰
16
1.50%
😍
5
0.468%
🏆
4
0.375%
👏
4
0.375%
🤝
4
0.375%
🤗
3
0.281%
🫡
3
0.281%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gsbdnsych. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Придумал самый неочевидный электоральный лайфхак, который вызовет у вас отторжение, но при этом всё равно является разумным. Если вы живёте в округе с сильным коммунистическим одномандатником, голосовать следует за единоросса. Причина: ЕР всё равно заберёт 210-215 одномандатных округов + 10 мандатов не повлияют на расклад в корне, но при этом 10 коммунистических одномандатников могут склонить думу влево. Голосовать з…
Либералы такие типа: как же Кремль жёстко наебал националистов с Новороссией
Те же либералы: давайте сольём голоса «оппозиционного консенсуса» Яблоку, пусть Путин увидит как нас много
Необучаемые.
Моя главная претензия ко всем возможным нетвойнистам — что они вычеркнули себя из российского политикума, чтобы стоять в белом пальто красивыми. Они своей ошибки не осознают, и продолжают действовать ровно также. Люди лишились родины и ничего не добились, ссать против ветра превращается в какой-то сомнительный, но очень твёрдый принцип.
Россия продолжает контакты с Телеграм по восстановлению доступа к мессенджеру, — Песков
Тянет написать нечто саркастичное, но это неправильный позыв. Правильный позыв сказать: Россия — молодец. Систему определяет не ошибка, а реакция на ошибку. И это очень хорошо и правильно, что Россия не упорствует в самодурстве, а сдаёт назад. Потому как требуется большой государственный рассудок и мужество, чтобы сказать: мы был…
В высказывании Зюганова интересно даже не то, что он прямо нарушил федеральный конституционный закон №2, который запрещает надругательство над российским гербом, и даже не то, последует ли за этим наказание. Зюганов не танцевал на фоне огня или церкви и не ел кулич неподобающе, не постил фотографию политика, которую экспертиза сочтёт экстремистской символикой.
Интересно в этой выходке, что Зюганов нарушил закон, за …
Вообще одна новость лучше другой в последние дни. Намедни толпа людей, которая даже приблизительно не понимает, как работает ИИ, что половина государственной политики в области оборота информации прямо мешает его развитию, каким-то образом уловили, что ИИ — стратегическая технология, и дабы закрепиться в XXI веке приняли ЗАКОН о его развитии, ничего в сущности не меняет. Ну, всё, мы спасены!
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @gsbdnsych. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Обыкновенный царизм @ordinaryczarizm · 43,541 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Под лед @podled · 34,704 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Роман Юнеман @big3russia · 26,966 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Норин @norinea · 40,615 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Павел Губарев @pgubarev · 42,069 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Zlawyers. Русские юристы @zlawyers · 26,903 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
Комиссар Исчезает @komissarischezaet · 31,146 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
ИА "Стекломой" @ia_steklomoy · 110,015 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 122,253 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артемий & Сыч” (@gsbdnsych), 4,935 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gsbdnsych.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.