Для вопросов, предложений: https://t.me/Zlawyers_bot
Если хочется поддерживать канал и писать комментарии:
@evilzlawyersbot
Поддержка канала более высокого уровня + чат для донатеров:
@Zlawyers_premium_bot
Created
5 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,770–27,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 23:56
26,882
-14
6 Nov 2026, 20:14
26,896
+15
5 Nov 2026, 21:19
26,881
+18
4 Nov 2026, 19:45
26,863
-1
3 Nov 2026, 20:47
26,864
-4
2 Nov 2026, 22:42
26,868
-11
2 Nov 2026, 01:38
26,879
+1
1 Nov 2026, 02:08
26,878
-11
31 Oct 2026, 04:29
26,889
-2
30 Oct 2026, 05:27
26,891
-13
29 Oct 2026, 06:08
26,904
-10
28 Oct 2026, 03:20
26,914
-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:31
26,921
-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:59
26,925
-8
24 Oct 2026, 22:48
26,933
-5
23 Oct 2026, 23:40
26,938
-5
23 Oct 2026, 02:21
26,943
-4
22 Oct 2026, 01:25
26,947
+12
20 Oct 2026, 20:38
26,935
+52
19 Oct 2026, 16:19
26,883
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.5%
avg views ÷ 26,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
107 (28 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
381,180
Reactions total
16,354
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,570
Videos
≈211
Links
≈2,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20m 19s
Average length
3m 23s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61,634 reactions across 106 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
22,377
36.3%
😁
8,741
14.2%
custom 5463303107519716229
7,483
12.1%
🔥
4,404
7.15%
🙈
4,394
7.13%
👍
4,126
6.69%
custom 5474522038838238551
3,026
4.91%
❤
1,645
2.67%
custom 5231008495645516430
1,587
2.57%
🤯
1,072
1.74%
🤔
797
1.29%
👎
771
1.25%
custom 5237921335702724931
308
0.5%
❤🔥
221
0.359%
🦄
187
0.303%
🫡
172
0.279%
🐳
115
0.187%
🎉
103
0.167%
🌚
82
0.133%
💅
23
0.037%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 107 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zlawyers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (40.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Новость о сокращении аппаратов обычно вызывает у обывателей щенячий восторг
Хотя на самом деле это ещё один шаг по превращению Госдумы и палаты регионов в клоунаду
Меньше качественной экспертизы в парламенте - больше хайпа и эпатажа, больше влияния исполнительной власти и частных интересов
Хотите больше новостей в стиле «В Госдуме предложили кастрировать каждого третьего петуха»? - кушайте, не обляпайтесь
Компания SpaceX совершила ошибку, оказав помощь Украине, — Илон Маск
Абсолютно любая компания или человек, оказавшие помощь Украине совершили ошибку. Но, чтобы это стало очевидным для всего мира нужна сущая мелочь — одержанная убедительная победа. В таком случае мы, рано или поздно, увидим поджигателей войны из руководства западных держав в наручниках под трибуналом. В иных случаях, увы.
@zlawyers
А вот поздравление к дню народного единства от МИДа РФ. Такое лоскутное одеяло России, такие разные, но все-таки мы вместе.
Было уже в истории государство, которое называли лоскутным одеялом — Австро-Венгрия. Сможете найти его на карте сегодня? Что в конечном счете разорвало эту страну?
Плавильные котлы показывают себя ощутимо более надежными.
@zlawyers
Вообще, политически праздник 4 ноября не очень выгоден для современного государства. Почему? Причина банальна: отмечается событие, которое в принципе стало возможным именно из-за пребывания государства в клинической смерти. Тогда русские и примкнувшие к ним люди самоорганизовались, создали армию, получили деньги у меценатов и выкинули поляков с предателями из сердца русского государства.
Вот так вот легко и без особ…
Прекрасно выступила профессор Дагестанского государственного университета Зиядова Дурея Зиядиновна. Говорит, что кровная месть не должна быть квалифицирующим признаком при совершении убийства.
Очень странное заявление: давайте все резать друг друга, а к государству не обращаться, ага. Очень современно и соответствует традиционным ценностям.
На самом-то деле она говорит о по-человечески понятной вещи. Если живешь в …
С днём рождения Российской империи, дорогие соотечественники!
Это была одна из самых прекрасных страниц в нашей истории!
Возврат к тем традиционным ценностям невозможен, ибо большинство их носителей было физически уничтожено.
Но и сохранённого задела было достаточно, чтобы совершить научный прорыв в XX веке.
А сила культурных архетипов была настолько велика, что даже в позднесоветском кино сотрудники КГБ были гораз…
Во Франции одобрили поправку о введении налога на интернет-трафик для крупных цифровых компаний, включая Netflix, Google и Meta (признана экстремистской и запрещена в РФ), пишет Le Figaro. Согласно инициативе, они должны будут платить в бюджет 5,5 евроцента за каждый гигабайт данных, переданный пользователям.
За поправку проголосовали 11 депутатов Национального собрания, против — 10. Контролировать объем трафика буд…
Во всех этих историях с излишней любовью к кому угодно, кроме самой России, главный вопрос — причем здесь день единства народов России? Причем здесь представление Азербайджана? Как это функционирует в головах организаторов всего этого безумия? И зачем?
@zlawyers
Когда думаешь, что российские следователи, вместе с судами, не могут действовать ещё более криво и топорно, они всегда найдут чем удивить
Теперь использование VPN и удаление сообщений стали преподноситься следствием как аргументы для заключения подозреваемых под стражу. С точки зрения действующего законодательства такое себе: использование VPN или настройка автоудаления в мессенджерах не являются противоправными дея…
Доблестный адвокатский цех, строго следующий доблестной адвокатской этике, вновь доблестно ругается в интернете.
Мы в Zlawyers адвокатской этикой не ограничены, так что можем побыть арбитрами в споре.
Несмотря на отличное отношение к адвокату Калугину, ранее мы вполне позволяли себе его жестко критиковать, так что за нашу беспристрастность можно не волноваться. Все-таки мы профессионалы 🤔
@zlawyers
Кто бы сомневался, какой именно регион отличится. Трутнев конечно глыба, нечего говорить. Желаем удачи в управлении важнейшим макрорегионом и Олегу Кожемяко.
Напомним, что Читу никто никогда не атаковал. Там управленцы сами справляются.
@zlawyers
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @zlawyers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@zlawyers edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 October 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 82 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Михаил Матвеев коммент @matveevkomment · 59,642 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Кирилл Кабанов @kabanovkv · 52,323 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Обыкновенный царизм @ordinaryczarizm · 43,488 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Нити Империи @RusUnlimited · 104,678 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zlawyers. Русские юристы” (@zlawyers), 26,882 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zlawyers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
