Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фунт 🔥 Национал-бурлеск

Channel

Фунт 🔥 Национал-бурлеск

@vsem_xorosho

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,215subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001075125835
TypeChannel
Username@vsem_xorosho
Created10 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vsem_xorosho

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2146,5276,370.55 August 2026 — 6,272 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,272 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,285 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,286 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,337 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,349 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,352 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,354 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,325 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,313 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,315 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,309 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,527 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,247 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,236 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,224 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,227 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,234 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,225 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,223 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,221 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,214 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,217 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,215 subscribers6,2155 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,167–6,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 19:506,215-2
4 Nov 2026, 20:116,217+3
2 Nov 2026, 02:556,214-7
30 Oct 2026, 03:206,221-2
27 Oct 2026, 11:276,223-2
24 Oct 2026, 21:176,225-9
21 Oct 2026, 18:066,234+7
18 Oct 2026, 12:476,227+3
15 Oct 2026, 12:316,224-12
12 Oct 2026, 08:156,236-11
5 Oct 2026, 08:226,247-280
27 Sept 2026, 07:176,527+218
15 Sept 2026, 07:576,309-6
11 Sept 2026, 17:566,315+2
6 Sept 2026, 19:366,313-12
2 Sept 2026, 11:136,325-29
30 Aug 2026, 13:046,354+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:436,352+3
21 Aug 2026, 16:156,349+12
18 Aug 2026, 17:586,337first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.6%
avg views ÷ 6,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held47 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total81,458
Reactions total1,244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,836 reactions across 39 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40121.8%
😁35619.4%
🔥20311.1%
custom 530083551559813500620211.0%
💯1488.06%
👍1457.90%
custom 54157546799319083851216.59%
custom 5359422064971239435613.32%
custom 5267197074037816115341.85%
🤬281.53%
😢261.42%
custom 5194994975825211044221.20%
custom 5452095811267627379211.14%
🌚191.03%
🍾150.817%
🌭130.708%
🤔100.545%
🫡80.436%
🥰30.163%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,060 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Нацболы утятизировались, круг замкнулся. https://t.me/adirect/31608

🍾2custom 51949949758252110441custom 53594220649712394351

6 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC558 views69 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Не понимаю этих нападок на пиццу, у нас вообще-то многонациональное государство, если кто забыл. Пицца — народное итальянское блюдо. Итальянцы — равноправная часть большой дружной семьи народов России, у меня друг итальянец был, во такой мужик, русский по духу. Пора бы компетентным органам заняться отдельными общественниками и депутатами, сеющими в нашей стране межнациональную рознь. https://t.me/flaminarium/2491

🔥36👍15😁9custom 53008355155981350067❤1💯1

5 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC≈1,800 views70 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ВОДКА.

custom 530083551559813500627🔥19custom 526719707403781611510custom 54157546799319083856👍3🥰3🤬1😢1

4 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,750 views53 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Мне больше нечего сказать.

😁32💯10custom 53008355155981350069😢2

4 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,870 views92 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В своей жизни я дважды совершал действия, которые при желании можно было бы квалифицировать как мошенничество. Один раз кинул стриповник на бабки (об этом как-нибудь потом), а второй — взял в видеопрокате фильм «Салон Китти» Тинто Брасса, а он оказался настолько хорош, что сегодня и не выложить все лучшие скриншоты из него — там ворох других статей. Ну, я его и не вернул. Сегодня Тинто Брасс умер. 93 года, нормально…

❤67😢21💯4

3 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,820 views90 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @adirect

Что-то радикально не так в устройстве государства, где самый простой способ сделать себе публичную карьеру — начать бороться с иностранным пирожком с мясом. В каждом обществе есть кликуши, но обычно им выделяют место в мусорных ток-шоу где-то рядом с теми, кто агитирует пить мочу ради здоровья, а не тянут в топы федеральных новостей. Русские — великая нация, и запрещать им что-то — проявление русофобии. Когда нацбол…

❤53💯16custom 535942206497123943511😁7🌭1👍1🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC≈6,580 views87 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Не знаю, чего некоторые злорадствуют по поводу хохлов, я бы скорее предпочёл видеть по другую сторону такие же штурмы помещений, в которых оборвалась жизнь Кокса, Седого и многих других достойных людей, а ещё больше потеряли здоровье и психику. https://t.me/mash_donbass/13267

👍43❤17💯14custom 53008355155981350065🌚2🤔2😁2🌭1

3 Nov 2026, 00:48 UTC≈3,190 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026

КОФЕ.

😁15custom 530083551559813500614🌚5💯1

2 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC≈3,160 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Как вы понимаете, обойти подобную тему стороной я не мог. Написал про библиорейв или как там называлась эта унылая поебень с претензией на оригинальность. https://t.me/ordinaryczarizm/5634

🔥10😁5❤4

2 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC≈3,140 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Абсурд какой, я свою первую преф-тусу в школе и замутил. Играли на деньги, разумеется. Что это за школа такая, где нельзя с пацанами пульку расписать? Тюрьма, а не школа.

😁33❤18💯12custom 530083551559813500610

1 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC≈5,730 views82 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Рейв в ленинской библиотеке это "и не рейв, и не библиотека". Круто только для фоточек и рилзов, а как ивент чепуха полнейшая. Гримаса эпохи соцсетей, жутко смердящая официозным стилем "работы с молодёжью".

💯50❤13😁12custom 53594220649712394356🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 22:01 UTC≈4,020 views55 reactionsread 6 November 2026

День несмешных шуток про Польшу объявляется открытым.

custom 541575467993190838528custom 519499497582521104410custom 52671970740378161159🌭5❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @vsem_xorosho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Павел Губарев
@pgubarev · 42,096
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Под лед
@podled · 34,696
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Норин
@norinea · 40,689
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Комиссар Исчезает
@komissarischezaet · 30,957
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Роман Юнеман
@big3russia · 27,206
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Наемник. Иван Даин
@naemnik_Z · 22,529
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
Егор Холмогоров
@holmogor_talks · 19,461
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Обыкновенный царизм
@ordinaryczarizm · 43,513
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Костылев
@read_kostylev · 25,548
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Каргач 🇷🇺⚡️Ꙃ
@karga4 · 22,216
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Александр Пушкин. Лайфстайл
@pushkins_life · 25,975
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Zlawyers. Русские юристы
@zlawyers · 26,882
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
Александр Пелевин Z
@comradepelevin · 19,910
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
ИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 108,662
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
ЛЕДОРУБ
@elpicahielo · 20,038
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 123,388
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Русский императив
@cybersotnik · 34,743
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
Пролив Сталина
@prolivstalina · 41,244
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Мальцовская Галерея
@malzoffsgallery · 30,688
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Михаил Булгаков. Лайфстайл
@bulgakov_life · 19,883
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фунт 🔥 Национал-бурлеск” (@vsem_xorosho), 6,215 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsem_xorosho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.