Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net -749. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,576–43,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 00:36
42,101
+6
5 Nov 2026, 02:20
42,095
-14
3 Nov 2026, 23:39
42,109
-1
1 Nov 2026, 21:51
42,110
-3
31 Oct 2026, 00:08
42,113
+37
30 Oct 2026, 03:08
42,076
+54
28 Oct 2026, 23:59
42,022
+29
28 Oct 2026, 00:35
41,993
+5
26 Oct 2026, 21:54
41,988
+3
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
41,985
+15
23 Oct 2026, 22:46
41,970
+12
22 Oct 2026, 23:10
41,958
-16
21 Oct 2026, 21:29
41,974
-18
20 Oct 2026, 13:09
41,992
-5
19 Oct 2026, 15:36
41,997
-2
18 Oct 2026, 17:58
41,999
+1
17 Oct 2026, 15:37
41,998
+2
16 Oct 2026, 15:06
41,996
+75
15 Oct 2026, 15:21
41,921
+79
14 Oct 2026, 16:55
41,842
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
70.5%
avg views ÷ 42,101 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,700
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
36 (26 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
386,100
Reactions total
9,703
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 21:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 33s
Average length
6m 07s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22,428 reactions across 34 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
8,930
39.8%
👍
6,657
29.7%
🔥
3,987
17.8%
🤯
1,553
6.92%
😱
771
3.44%
🤔
530
2.36%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
114
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 35 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
85
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pgubarev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Лучший подарок для русского воина за последние 100 с лишним лет — «Кодекс чести русского офицера».
Советы Кульчицкого, написанные им во время Первой мировой, затем читали и в окопах Великой Отечественной, и сегодня в посадках Новороссии они столь же актуальны и востребованы.
Так что если вы всё ещё в раздумьях насчёт подарка к 23 февраля, то лучше ничего не придумать. И не только для военных, но и любых думающих и …
Группа Невского, отряд Спарта БПС Варяг.
В конце апреля тут произошла еще одна ужасная история. Имя и позывной пострадавшего бойца не разглашаю по этическим соображениям. Молодой боец, неуверенный в себе новичок, физически слабый и не вполне понимающий, где оказался, сфотографировал внутренний документ, чтобы выучить позывные и пароли (ему никто не объяснил, что так делать было нельзя). Это заметил один из подчиненн…
Палач этот в своих преступлениях тесно взаимодействовал с начмедом медицинской службы Спецназа Ахмат, неким Константином Флоричем, он же Буля, он же Джабраил.Уверен, Палач дал показания и на него тоже.
Кирилл Озеров, командир группы в отряде Спарта БПС Варяг – настоящий садист, который видимо, получает удовольствие от избиения и унижения слабых.
Преступление Озеров совершил в первой половине июня. Боец с позывным Монгол был зверски избит Озеровым, который бил его руками, ногами, затем металлическим прутом рассек ему всю голову, топтался и прыгал на голове, стрелял в землю из пистолета за ушами, наступив на голову …
Отряд "Спарта" БПС Варяг, группа Невского.
Что представляет из себя боевая работа данного подразделения, нетрудно догадаться по предыдущим публикациям. На одном из направлений фронта командование осуществляло удары по целям беспилотниками типа Ланцет. Стоимость Ланцета варьируется от 3 до 5,5 млн рублей. С середины июня на протяжении 3-х месяцев боевой работы группой Невского было выпущено около 100 Ланцетов стоимос…
ДЕЛО ОТРЯДА «СПАРТА» БРИГАДЫ «ВАРЯГ»
Взял в работу дело по представлению интересов военнослужащих отряда «Спарта» (в/ч 01651), которые заявили о преступлениях со стороны своих командиров.
По заявлению доверителей, в 2026 году командир отряда ст. лейтенант Озеров К.А. («Невский»), его заместитель («Степной») и комбат («Паук»):
Совершали следующие действия:
1. Избивали подчинённых.
2. Удерживали их в наручниках.
3. П…
НА МОРЕ В ДНР
Едут даже с Чукотки. Несмотря ни на что
Знаменитый московский блогер Александр Чаленко в сентябре 2026 года, когда уже заканчивался пляжный сезон, посетил курортный посёлок на Азовском море – Урзуф в Донецкой Народной Республике, чтобы пообщаться с отдыхающими и поинтересоваться, повлияли ли бандеровские дроны и дефицит бензина на их желание позагорать и покупаться в тёплые солнечные дни.
Среди его со…
Отряд "Спарта" БПС Варяг, группа Невского. Громкий крик дневального нарушает тишину:
— Раааняйсь, смииирнааа! Входит командир группы Герой России Невский!
Невский (старший лейтенант Озеров) приближается к дверному проему и с ходу пробивает удар в голову 50-киллограмового дневального, тот падает на пол, скорчившись от боли.
Пронзительным взглядом Озеров осматривает строй и чеканит:
— Вечернюю поверку проводит Гер…
Разбудите нас через 100 лет и спросите, о чем на интервью разговаривают с русскими националистами, и мы ответим — выясняют, кто такие русские.
Тут синхронно вышли интервью Егора Холмогорова и Романа Антоновского («Эмпатии Манучи» и Антону Красовскому соответственно). Даже судя по таймкодам, ясно, что опять речь о том, кто такой русский и что делать, если твоя бабушка утюг.
Это удивительно, ведь когда нас, меня или …
👍449🔥92🤬30🤔19🤯5😱4
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @pgubarev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@pgubarev edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 October 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @pgubarev as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
27 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Спец @spetstv · 21,562 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Рой ТВ - Максим Калашников @roy_tv_mk · 55,049 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Мирослава Регинская (Свободу Стрелкову!) @i_strelkov_2023 · 47,781 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Павел Губарев” (@pgubarev), 42,101 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgubarev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
