Смешные новости из мира IT.
По рекламе: @proglib_adv
Учиться у нас: https://proglib.io/w/b2a87f06
Для обратной связи: @proglibrary_feeedback_bot
РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a4cb8aa16f1b554298
Created
11 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,530–25,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:37
25,571
-8
16 Sept 2026, 09:36
25,579
-17
14 Sept 2026, 16:00
25,596
-18
13 Sept 2026, 05:39
25,614
-10
8 Sept 2026, 17:38
25,624
-27
5 Sept 2026, 08:36
25,651
-12
3 Sept 2026, 09:43
25,663
-11
2 Sept 2026, 06:03
25,674
-1
1 Sept 2026, 06:35
25,675
-5
31 Aug 2026, 08:57
25,680
-10
30 Aug 2026, 09:02
25,690
-4
29 Aug 2026, 05:43
25,694
-10
28 Aug 2026, 05:57
25,704
-11
27 Aug 2026, 02:29
25,715
-9
26 Aug 2026, 02:04
25,724
-11
25 Aug 2026, 02:14
25,735
-7
23 Aug 2026, 16:35
25,742
-7
22 Aug 2026, 01:38
25,749
-12
20 Aug 2026, 17:52
25,761
-6
19 Aug 2026, 20:56
25,767
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.94%
avg views ÷ 25,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.127%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
29 (20 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
10,643
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈58
Links
≈1,810
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
268 reactions across 23 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
200
74.6%
🌚
20
7.46%
❤
12
4.48%
🤩
7
2.61%
😍
5
1.87%
😢
5
1.87%
👎
4
1.49%
👾
4
1.49%
👍
3
1.12%
🥱
3
1.12%
👏
2
0.746%
❤🔥
1
0.373%
🎉
1
0.373%
🤔
1
0.373%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
893
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,770
over 28 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJrVGHw
1
19 September 2026
19 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
А вы уже забрали свой подарок ко Дню программиста?
К вашему профессиональному празднику Tproger, Proglib, Столото, Центральный университет и SmartApe собрали целую коробку подарков. Переходите по ссылке, трясите коробку и забирайте свой презент: https://tprg.ru/lYrK
Реклама. ИП Михайлишина Гузель Фаниловна, erid: 2W5zFJrVGHw
😭 Как не потратить недельный лимит AI-кодинга за три дня?
Разберём на вебинаре, как тратить меньше на AI-агентов — без потери качества кода.
🔘 Поговорим о том:
— когда дорогая модель действительно нужна, а когда хватит дешёвой;
— сколько стоит один прогон и куда уходят токены;
— какие задачи можно отдавать субагентам;
— как настроить маршрутизацию моделей;
— что проверять в AI-коде перед merge.
✏️ Покажем всё на …
⚡️ Разработчик исправил последний баг в проекте.
Проект посмотрел на него и создал ещё три.
😆 hahacker_news
🐸От смешного до IT один шаг — Proglib.academy
🤪 Если бы можно было задать один вопрос про AI в разработке — что бы вы спросили?
Как выбрать инструмент? Как работать с AI-агентами? Как проверять сгенерированный код? Или как вообще встроить нейросети в свой процесс?
Собираем вопросы для вебинара. Самые залайканные разберём в первую очередь 🔥
Пишите, что действительно интересно ⬇️
🌸 Вселенная намекает: пора уже начать этот курс
С 14 сентября цены в Proglib Academy вырастут на 20% 👀
Так что если курс давно ждёт своего часа — лучше не откладывать ещё на месяц 😏
📍 Выбрать курс
⚡️ Разраб застрял в бардаке и не может собраться в отпуск!
Помогите кодеру разгрести завал и хорошо отдохнуть в новой мини-игре, найдите промокод на скидку на все курсы Proglib Academy (действует до 31.08) и другие плюшки! 🌴
⚡️ AI-агенты научились полностью выполнять задачи без участия человека.
Теперь они сами создают себе новые задачи, чтобы не выглядеть бездельниками.
😆 hahacker_news
🐸От смешного до IT один шаг — Proglib.academy
🤔 У большинства разработчиков уже есть подписки на IDE, GitHub Copilot, Claude, ChatGPT или облачные сервисы.
Логично, что обучение тоже постепенно приходит к той же модели: не покупать отдельный курс под каждую новую тему, а иметь доступ ко всей библиотеке и выбирать, что актуально именно сейчас.
Такой формат недавно появился и в Proglib Academy. Вместо одного курса — доступ сразу ко всей библиотеке и новым матери…
⚡️ С 1 августа трафик в MAX не тарифицируется. Мессенджер, которым никто не хотел пользоваться, теперь ещё и бесплатный — осталось только доплачивать.
😆 hahacker_news
🐸От смешного до IT один шаг — Proglib.academy
⚡️ Opus 5 Max снёс всю базу проекта через десять минут после старта. Ни один джун в истории не проходил этот путь так быстро.
😆 hahacker_news
🐸От смешного до IT один шаг — Proglib.academy
⚡️ После блокировок зарубежных криптобирж курс биткоина в России теперь определяется на глаз.
😆 hahacker_news
🐸От смешного до IT один шаг — Proglib.academy
😁14❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @hahacker_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BZD • Книги для программистов @bzd_channel · 36,430 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
Библиотека программиста @proglibrary · 78,334 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Библиотека питониста | Python, Django, Flask @pyproglib · 37,384 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Полка Разработчика @developer_shelf · 26,827 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
Python Books. Книги по питону @pythonbooks · 38,540 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
Библиотека джависта | Java, Spring, Maven, Hibernate @javaproglib · 22,055 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Physics.Math.Code @physics_lib · 146,582 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Библиотека Go-разработчика | Golang @goproglib · 24,071 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming @nuancesprog · 56,542 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Java библиотека @javalib · 30,666 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Советские учебники @sovuche · 105,414 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Pythonist.ru - образование по питону @pythonist_ru · 24,052 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Типичный программист @tproger · 78,569 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Data Science @datascienceiot · 42,642 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Golang @Golang_google · 40,434 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Porscode | CMD @porscode_tg · 28,431 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
Python Hacks @python_secrets · 40,594 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Базы данных | Access, SQL, Big Data @databases_secrets · 30,034 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hahacker_news” (@hahacker_news), 25,571 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hahacker_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.