👀 Автомобилист взломал навигационную систему, чтобы перевести часы После перехода на зимнее время владелец Renault Latitude 2014 года решил поправить часы. Оказалось, меню настройки доступно только с оригинальной SD-картой навигации. Карта к тому времени уже отправилась в мусор. Замена с доставкой стоила около €60. Вместо покупки владелец начал разбирать прошивку, поднял эмулятор системы и нашёл способ выполнить св…

Channel
hahacker_news
@hahacker_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,248subscribers
-591 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001309608108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hahacker_news |
| Description | Смешные новости из мира IT. По рекламе: @tproger_sales_bot Учиться у нас: https://proglib.io/w/b2a87f06 Для обратной связи: @proglibrary_feeedback_bot РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a4cb8aa16f1b554298 Заявка: 8138159610 |
| Created | 11 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hahacker_news |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 25,248 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:17 | 25,255 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 25,263 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 25,271 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:38 | 25,274 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 25,281 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 25,289 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 25,296 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 25,308 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 25,315 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 25,319 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 25,325 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 25,339 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 25,346 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 25,353 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 25,369 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 25,375 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 25,384 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 25,391 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 25,399 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.86%
- avg views ÷ 25,248 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,730
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.243%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (20 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 41,571 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 21:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,670
- Videos
- ≈58
- Links
- ≈1,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
340 reactions across 39 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 233 | 68.5% | |
| 🌚 | 20 | 5.88% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 4.71% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 4.71% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.94% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.65% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 2.35% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 2.06% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.47% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.47% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.588% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.588% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.294% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.294% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.294% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀 Попросил ИИ написать термометр для Mac — нашёл майнер Пользователь Reddit попросил Claude Code сделать приложение для мониторинга температуры. При проверке показания оказались подозрительно высокими, и агент посмотрел, что загружает процессор. По рассказу владельца Mac, нашёлся XMRig с загрузкой около 1175% CPU — примерно двенадцать ядер. В комментариях пользователь сообщил, что агент помог убрать майнер. Один ф…
👍3❤1
👀 Разработчик разозлился на плату за отмену Adobe и взялся переписывать её приложения После спора о плате за отмену подписки разработчик запустил ArtCraft — открытые аналоги Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere и других программ Adobe. Код писал на Rust с помощью Claude. Проект дошёл до Hacker News, где автор пояснил, что приложения ещё далеки от готовности. В плане PhotoCraft готовность к реальной работе оценили прим…
🔥4😁1
👀 Электронную свечу сделали такой реалистичной, что её нужно поджигать Подносишь огонь — загорается светодиод. Дунул — погас. Внутри термистор, транзистор и несколько резисторов. Пламя нагревает датчик и включает свет. Затем схема сама поддерживает нужную температуру, пока её не охладят дуновением. Схемы и демонстрацию выложили на GitHub. Есть даже версия для электронного бейджа — чтобы носить свечу на себе. 🐸 Ха…
❤1
👀 Google собрала клавиатуру, в которой клавиши сами подъезжают к пальцу Команда Gboard поставила 116 клавиш на четыре движущиеся ленты. Нужная буква подъезжает — нажимаешь. Можно печатать одной рукой, пока вторая держит чай. Для заглавных и строчных букв предусмотрены отдельные клавиши. У клавиатуры есть мотор, контроллер и открытые схемы: этот конвейер можно собрать самостоятельно. Шуточный прототип показали к Дн…
❤1
👀 Ламповый компьютер занял стену и обогревает комнату Британский энтузиаст собрал дома компьютер на 460 советских радиолампах. Конструкция висит на стене, греет комнату, а для настройки верхних плат нужна стремянка. После включения машина прогревается 10–15 минут. Затем можно запускать вычисления — например, последовательность Фибоначчи. Для внуков создатель планирует сделать простой симулятор полёта на дирижабле. …
👍8
👀 Энтузиаст разогнал электронную бумагу до 30 кадров в секунду ради Game Boy Экран, который обычно неспешно обновляет страницы, теперь показывает игры Game Boy. В проекте InkBoy маленький E Ink-дисплей выдаёт около 30 кадров в секунду и четыре оттенка серого. Для этого пришлось написать собственный драйвер: он меняет импульсы, управляющие частицами пигмента, и сокращает время обновления. В основе устройства — плата…
❤2
👀 Энтузиаст поставил отдельный процессор в каждую клавишу У клавиатуры Keybytes каждая клавиша — самостоятельный модуль со своим RISC-V-микроконтроллером. Модули держатся на магнитах: их можно переставлять и собирать нужную раскладку прямо на столе. Соседние клавиши передают питание и данные через контакты по краям. Отдельный управляющий модуль связывает всю конструкцию с компьютером по USB или Bluetooth. По оценк…
👎1
👀 Энтузиаст два месяца печатал механический калькулятор Чтобы складывать числа, теперь можно взять 109 пластиковых деталей, собрать механизм и покрутить ручку. Энтузиаст сделал карманный калькулятор на 3D-принтере. Проект занял два месяца и около ста итераций конструкции. Шестерёнки заедали, детали ломались, а люфт сбивал механизм. В итоге помогли напечатанные пружины и храповик. Финальная версия потребовала 17 ча…
❤1
👀 Кофеварке приписали терабайт трафика за десять дней Родители пожаловались на медленный Wi-Fi. Их сын открыл статистику сети и обнаружил кофеварку Keurig с 1008 ГБ исходящего трафика за десять дней. Скриншот счётчика UniFi он опубликовал в X. Позже пользователь уточнил: большая часть трафика оставалась внутри домашней сети. Содержимое пакетов он не записывал, причину такого поведения установить не удалось. Кофева…
❤1👍1😁1
👀 Модель мозга мухи подключили к торговле криптовалютой Инженер создал Stonkfly — проект, в котором модель нервной системы мухи принимает торговые решения. В анонсе он сообщил, что выделил ей $100 на биткоин. Модели показывают график цены. Активность нейронов переводится в команды «купить», «продать» или «держать». Изменение стоимости портфеля запускает искусственный сигнал обратной связи. В сети 166 700 узлов. Ре…
😁4
👀 ИИ-представитель на собеседовании согласился на $60 тысяч вместо желаемых $150 тысяч Блогер отправил своего ИИ-представителя Виктора разговаривать с ботом-рекрутером. В демонстрации Виктор начал приукрашивать опыт кандидата, а затем заявил, что тот готов работать за $60 тысяч в год. Сам кандидат рассчитывал на $140–150 тысяч. Он возразил своему представителю прямо во время разговора. Бот-рекрутер обозначил потоло…
😁15
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @hahacker_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @hahacker_news as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 26 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 14 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 28 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
С какой авторской истории этой недели хахакнули?
- Квартальный план закрыли пустым коммитом29%
- SRE отправил IP-пакет голубем21%
- Я не хахакал50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@proglibrary · 77,665#1
@bzd_channel · 36,229#2
@pyproglib · 36,981#3
@goproglib · 23,900#4
@devopsslib · 10,327#5
@csharpproglib · 21,497#6
@dsproglib · 18,298#7
@javaproglib · 21,794#8
@cppproglib · 16,761#9
@frontendproglib · 20,621#10
@devbooksarchive · 15,617#11
@it_boooks · 47,353#12
@sklad_programmista · 3,897#13
@prog_lib_eng · 2,668#14
@itmemlib · 9,438#15
@maschinelearning · 10,856#16
@Golang_google · 40,464#17
@developer_shelf · 26,720#18
@habr_com · 134,368#19
@tproger · 77,990#20
@devops_interview_lib · 3,477#21
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 275,843#22
@golang_books · 16,877#23
@neuro_text · 6,443#24
@codecamp · 177,697#25
@hackproglib · 12,614#26
@code_m0de · 10,743#27
@mobileproglib · 9,099#28
@javalib · 30,352#29
@ithumor · 60,048#30
@devopslibrary · 19,874#31
@devops_problems_lib · 3,015#32
@dblib · 3,769#33
@go_interview_lib · 7,413#34
@knijnoe_xranilishe · 19,511#35
@itmemes · 121,926#36
@code_library · 17,524#37
@javacodecamp · 3,923#38
@csharp_interview_lib · 5,623#39
@data_secrets · 96,043#40
@robotics_autopilots_iot · 1,844#41
@javabooksarchive · 4,574#42
@itbook_library · 15,942#43
@java_library · 14,066#44
@github · 155,035#45
@it_secur · 63,375#46
@physics_lib · 146,706#47
@addmeto · 71,985#48
@uzdev_jobs · 26,196#49
@rust_code · 9,152#50
@denissexy · 140,553#51
@the_winda · 5,995#52
@S_E_Book · 23,094#53
@ai_newz · 98,261#54
@the_algorithms · 8,233#55
@thingsprogrammersdo · 16,063#56
@seeallochnaya · 81,129#57
@fikrlog · 19,711#58
@jakhonrakhmonov · 9,406#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@programmist_of · 20,576
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
@bzd_channel · 36,229
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
@proglibrary · 77,665
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@pyproglib · 36,981
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
@developer_shelf · 26,720
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
@frontendproglib · 20,621
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 September 2026
@pythonbooks · 38,347
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
@javaproglib · 21,794
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
@physics_lib · 146,706
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
@knijnoe_xranilishe · 19,511
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
@openit_archive · 18,768
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 October 2026
@goproglib · 23,900
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
@nuancesprog · 55,977
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@javalib · 30,352
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
@sovuche · 106,307
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
@devopslibrary · 19,874
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
@backend_it · 18,702
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
@seniorjavist · 20,386
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
@pythonist_ru · 23,877
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
@tproger · 77,990
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@datascienceiot · 42,513
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@Golang_google · 40,464
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
@porscode_tg · 28,123
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@i_odmin_book · 18,773
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hahacker_news” (@hahacker_news), 25,248 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hahacker_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.