Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📈ℙ𝕙𝕠𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕩 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪📉

Channel

📈ℙ𝕙𝕠𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕩 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪📉

@heisedris

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,499subscribers

+1,726 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002127105323
TypeChannel
Username@heisedris
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/heisedris

Growth

54,77356,49955,63621 August 2026 — 54,773 subscribers22 August 2026 — 54,891 subscribers24 August 2026 — 55,030 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,102 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,124 subscribers29 August 2026 — 55,938 subscribers30 August 2026 — 56,499 subscribers21 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1,726. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,514–56,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 12:5656,499+561
29 Aug 2026, 13:2555,938+814
28 Aug 2026, 10:1355,124+22
27 Aug 2026, 10:4455,102+12
26 Aug 2026, 11:0555,090+20
25 Aug 2026, 09:0555,070+40
24 Aug 2026, 10:5355,030+139
22 Aug 2026, 18:1754,891+118
21 Aug 2026, 23:3154,773first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 56,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,330
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held31 (8 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total196,260
Reactions total3,816
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,816 reactions across 31 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,66743.7%
👍97625.6%
🔥57515.1%
❤‍🔥3138.20%
👌1363.56%
👎330.865%
👏230.603%
🤣190.498%
😁140.367%
🫡120.314%
🤔90.236%
80.21%
😍60.157%
😐60.157%
💘30.079%
🙏30.079%
🌚20.052%
💋20.052%
🗿20.052%
🤝20.052%
5 further kinds50.131%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,816reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 31 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @heisedris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈2,340 views85 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥47❤‍🔥14👍7😐65🤔3😁21

29 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈2,360 views129 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Voice message

اگه رو طلا ترید میکنی حتما گوش کن✌ با ری اکشن انرژی بده

95👍11❤‍🔥9🔥4😁4👌3🗿2🥰1

29 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,640 views202 reactionsread 30 August 2026

هستی حرف بزنیم؟

👍15728❤‍🔥8🔥6👎3

26 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈5,050 views46 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥29❤‍🔥112🤔2👌1👍1

25 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈6,520 views122 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

مثلا همین الان خودم همینکارو کردم تارگت ۱۰۰٪ (۱۲۵٪) حساب خورد و برداشت تا فردا نه اینکه نتونم خودمو کنترل کنم برای ترید کردن یا نکردن ولی وقتی اینکارو میکنم دیگه حتی چارتم چک نمیکنم و به زندگیم میرسم امتحانش کن،جوابه✌

❤‍🔥76365🔥5

25 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈5,860 views99 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

جواب خلاصه میشه ستاپ نداد ترید نکن جواب بلند تر اگه نمیتونی ترید نکنی خودتو محدود کن کل بالانستو برداشت کن (فردا دورباره واریز میکنی) از حسابت خارج شو متاتریدر پاک کن اینترنتت قطع کن سیستم خاموش کن بزن بیرون و... راه زیاده فقط باید بتونی جلو خودت در بیای و این حداقل کاریه که باید بعنوان تریدر انجام بدی چون اصل "خود داری" و "خودآگاهی" توی ترید همیشه هست چه تو شروعش ،چه بعد ۱۰ سال

81👌9❤‍🔥4👍41

25 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈4,790 views310 reactions2 Starsread 30 August 2026

فعلا فوروارد تستو ادامه میدم اگه همه چی اوکی بود احتمالا کپی تریدُ استارت کنم با ری اکت نظرتو بگو بهم

👍20550❤‍🔥20👎14👏7🤣6👌3🔥3

25 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈4,760 views200 reactions2 Starsread 30 August 2026

وین ۸۲٪ و ریوارد ۳ کی فکرشو‌ میکرد💀

🔥13920❤‍🔥14👏10👌7🤔4🤣3👎2

25 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈5,140 views240 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
File

چند هفته‌ی اخیر تقریباً درگیر بک‌تست، اصلاح جزئیات ستاپ و پیدا کردن بهترین نسخه‌ی اجرای خودم بودم هفته‌ی گذشته روی یک حساب تست، نتیجه‌ی این تغییرات حدود +200٪ رشد بود این هفته هم فقط تو دو روز معامله، حساب جدید حدود +121٪ رشد ناخالص و 93% رشد بعد از کسر کمیسون داشته . چیزی که برای من مهم‌تر از خود عددهاست اینه که این نتایج بعد از تغییرات تصادفی به‌وجود نیومد حاصل ساعت‌ها بک‌تست، اصلاح ورودها، مدیریت بهتر پوزیشن و

205🔥17👌11🫡4🤣2👍1

23 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈6,190 views221 reactionsread 30 August 2026

تو ترید یه مرحله ای هست که دیگه نمیفهمی واقعاً چی بلدی همزمان همه چیزو میدونی و هیچی نمیدونی! چون اطلاعات زیادی داری برای تحلیل و ترید روی چارت، هم ستاپICT میبینی، هم عرضه و تقاضا، هم واگرایی، هم اوردر بلاک، هم… به‌جای تصمیم گرفتن، فقط دنبال دلیل بیشتر برای ورود میگردی وقتی تاییدیه اصلیتو‌میگیری وارد نمیشی چون فلان سبک خلاف جهت پوزیشن فعلیت بهت میگه! قطعا تجربه‌ش کردی بعضی وقتا رشد توی ترید از یاد گرفتن چیز

167👍28👌16🔥8❤‍🔥2

23 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈6,210 views250 reactionsread 30 August 2026

مشکل خیلی‌ها کمبود اطلاعات نیست؛ وفور اطلاعاته! فکر میکنم یکی از بزرگ‌ترین مشکلات امروز تریدرها اینه که بیش از حد آموزش میبینن خود من چند سال توی این تله گیر افتاده بودم نه اینکه آموزش دیدن بد باشه مشکل از جایی شروع میشه که هر هفته یک سبک یک استاد یک اندیکاتور و یک ستاپ جدید وارد ذهنت میکنی و خب اینجوری نمیشه! بروسلی میگه: 🟢 من از کسی نمیترسم که هزار تا فن بلده، از کسی میترسم که یک فن رو هزار بار تمرین میکنه..!

🔥135👍6740❤‍🔥7👎1

17 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC≈9,150 views79 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

62❤‍🔥6💘3🔥3👍2🍓1💯1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @heisedris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 354,994 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

📉چ‌آرتیست | Chartist📈
@heisedrisss · 31,532
#1
Solevrage
@solevrage11 · 49,243
#2
Fxfarid
@fxfaridb · 15,968
#3
سیگنال کریپتو و فارکس عمومی ققنوس ❤️‍🔥
@adam3 · 94,607
#4
Arash analysis
@arash_timess · 426,635
#5
⚜ امیر وزیری | آموزش ترید ⚜
@vazirifx · 14,317
#6
TSESTOCKS
@tsestocks · 26,019
#7
Rastad | راستاد
@rastad · 415,297
#8
Hoseini Finance
@hoseini · 310,114
#9
Sobhan samadi | سبحان صمدى
@sobhanforex · 103,109
#10
CryptoSaba
@cryptosaba · 208,816
#11
Nahangx | تحلیل بازار های مالی
@nahangx · 160,437
#12
Auto trade forex lord 👽💣|ربات اتو ترید فارکس لورد کریپتو|forex/gold /فارکس/سیگنال فارکس/سیگنال طلا/اموزشات الترای لورد کریپتو
@autotradeforexlord · 9,365
#13
'Live81Trade'
@live81trade · 1,895
#14
Sir BitMiner | Trade🌪️
@SirBitMiner · 780,515
#15
LIMITLESS
@limitless_strategy · 10,538
#16
fatimagold | فاطیماگلد
@fatimacafetrade · 135,409
#17
Omid ahravani - Trade 📈
@tradeomidinovip · 10,118
#18
EarnVest
@earnvest · 50,711
#19
ساتوشی
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 83,865
#20
𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗫_𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗥|سیگنال
@bit_coin_signal · 8,419
#21
SIGNAL | CRYPTO | شریدر
@sheraderCrypto · 148,900
#22
تیم ترید حامد غریب نواز
@hamed_gharibnavaz · 3,891
#23
امیر فارکس
@amiirforex1 · 41,891
#24
Tradingprofessor
@tradingprofessorchannel · 69,672
#25
traderarta1
@traderarta · 11,357
#26
SMC 💸
@SMC_BACKTEST · 4,590
#27
Mohammadhosein.fx
@mohammadhoseinfx · 2,450
#28
Academy Abdolahi Am
@mehdiabdolahi_t · 11,593
#29
Roohitrade academy
@roohitradesignal · 4,030
#30
آرین نادری (تریدر فارکس)
@ariannaderi · 13,608
#31
سیگنال کریپتو چارتیست | Crypto Signal
@ChartsPrice · 83,849
#32
پرايس اكشن مبتدي تا حرفه اي
@priceaction_Amator_To_Master · 4,925 (as read 23 August 2026)
#33
HypoDrop | هایپودراپ
@HypodropIR · 7,037
#34
tradehadi /ترید هادی
@trade_hadi · 457,516
#35
سیامک اسدی _ تریدر بازار مالی
@siamak_asadi · 8,279
#36
Kashazimi
@kashazimi · 3,960
#37
رهام صادقی | بیست و یک
@bistoyekrypto · 40,792
#38
درآمد دلاری | ترید حنیف 🎓📚
@hanif60s · 29,117
#39
🔹🎓TradeHub | University🎓🔹
@TradeHub_University · 246 (as read 23 August 2026)
#40
The Wow Trader
@the_wow_trader · 9,283
#41
📈 Phoenix Trading Floor 📉
@Phoenixtradingfloor · 3,914
#42
Trade City Pro ™️
@tradecity_pro · 75,810
#43
امیرم‌بیت | درآمد دلاری
@amirambit · 183,058
#44
Lord Auto trade bot💣👽لورد کریپتو بات|سیگنال رایگان|کریپتو |signal|ارزدیجیتال|ترید|ارزدیجیتال|ایردراپ| اموزشات الترای لورد
@lordcryptovipbot · 25,832
#45
Lord Crypto | سیگنال کریپتو
@lordcryptovip · 836,562
#46
Matin Crypto | ارز دیجیتال
@MawtinCrypto_vip · 5,641,766
#47
Otis
@otis_vip · 84,115
#48
متالیا
@metaliea · 9,219
#49
MhD fxtrader | مهدی فتوحی
@mhdfxtrader · 7,794
#50
سیگنال رایگان | Rst Trade
@RstCrypto · 400,658
#51
Lasttrader.eth
@ETHlasttrader · 45,683
#52
شفیعی ارز / shafiei arz
@shafieiarz1 · 12,095
#53
📈ترید | آکادمی YEGANEFX🥇
@iamyeganefx · 8,408
#54
BITFA ™️‌| بیتفا
@bitfa · 223,469
#55
HajAli | CryptoPlus🚀
@cryptoplusers · 413,971
#56
ارز دیجیتال با عموکاشانی|سیگنال رایگان
@crypto_amookashani · 98,916
#57
Ali kashani
@amookashani · 125,840
#58
نهنگ قرمز - سیگنال رایگان💰
@redmahale · 47,650
#59
لایوترید با آراد
@cryptobyarad · 55,487 (as read 23 August 2026)
#60
Binam Trade | بینام ترید
@binamtrade · 27,740
#61
TV کافه ترید
@cafetradetv · 75,724
#62
محمد هلاکوئی
@cloobmali · 107,533
#63
کریپتو شیروانی
@shirvanico · 51,405
#64
ارزپـُن |™️ARZPON
@arz_pon · 11,140
#65
MhD crypto
@mhdcrypto7 · 2,460
#66
Radin trade | رادین ترید
@radin_trade · 61,755
#67
دنیای آموزش
@G_N_E_S_R_0 · 126,469
#68
IMAN PROFIT
@imanprofit · 55,836
#69
𝐀𝐑𝐙 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐗𝐘 | ارز دیجیتال
@ARZ_PROXY · 1,572,451
#70
👑 KING CRYPTO | کینگ کریپتو
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 107,948
#71
Liquidity Cycle 🧠
@Liquidity_cycle · 4,840
#72
قبیله ققنوس‌|ترید با‌ هوش‌مصنوعی🤖❤️‍🔥
@sokoon1111 · 231,678
#73
اتاق معاملاتی VIP
@tradeviproom · 35,299
#74
SUPREME TRADERS
@Suprem_traders · 11,581
#75
باشگاه کافه ترید
@bashgahcafetrade · 45,918
#76
Amir_ramzali
@amir_ramzali · 113,720
#77
حسام میرزاده| ارزدیجیتال-فارکس|
@hesam_mirzade · 37,967
#78
نکات ترید | معامله‌گری
@forexsoood · 1,662 (as read 23 August 2026)
#79
RiaLyz
@Rialyzzz · 1,961
#80
Okey Signal
@okey_signal · 16,486
#81
Mahdi_tradee | مهدی ترید
@mahditradevip · 6,974
#82
ارزدیجیتال 🚨
@naghdexx · 78,189
#83
کانال vip آرسا ترید
@arsacafetrade · 45,904
#84
کانال لایو ترید فارکس | SorooshFx
@SorooshFX · 4,060
#85
لایو ترید با وحیدرادمهر
@fx_radmehr · 4,603
#86
nabu
@web3nabu · 49,542
#87
RTM Courses
@RTM_Courses · 1,130 (as read 23 August 2026)
#88

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Solevrage
@solevrage11 · 49,243
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Tradingprofessor
@tradingprofessorchannel · 69,672
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
مستری بوک | کتاب رایگان
@mastrybook · 86,418
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Masculinebros آرشیو🔥
@masculinebros1 · 62,012
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی || فرشید فرخی
@farshid_io · 306,258
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
IMAN PROFIT
@imanprofit · 55,836
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Qabile
@money_tribe · 46,130
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📈ℙ𝕙𝕠𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕩 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪📉” (@heisedris), 56,499 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heisedris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.