Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хельга, да

Channel

Хельга, да

@helga18plus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

138,656subscribers

-4,477 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001455595561
TypeChannel
Username@helga18plus
Descriptionсексуальный научпоп, психология и мемы по рекламе: @helga_dada предложить свое: @hielga_bot РКН: 7138800812
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/helga18plus

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

138,656143,133140,894.56 August 20266 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -4,477. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,984–143,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:56138,656-61
5 Nov 2026, 14:26138,717-62
4 Nov 2026, 13:19138,779-63
3 Nov 2026, 13:19138,842-35
2 Nov 2026, 15:06138,877-45
1 Nov 2026, 15:51138,922-59
31 Oct 2026, 14:45138,981-48
30 Oct 2026, 14:31139,029-69
29 Oct 2026, 16:55139,098-67
28 Oct 2026, 17:39139,165-31
27 Oct 2026, 21:04139,196-65
26 Oct 2026, 18:16139,261-60
25 Oct 2026, 17:41139,321-39
24 Oct 2026, 16:37139,360-69
23 Oct 2026, 13:36139,429-43
22 Oct 2026, 16:27139,472-86
21 Oct 2026, 09:36139,558-75
20 Oct 2026, 06:01139,633-54
19 Oct 2026, 07:00139,687-47
18 Oct 2026, 08:41139,734first reading

Engagement

310 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 138,656 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 310 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held310 (30 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total1,742,600
Reactions total41,531
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,100
Videos
≈52
Links
≈327

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

150,521 reactions across 305 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5235743684204437322101,72067.6%
custom 518818661943739543635,02023.3%
🤔13,7819.16%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 310 of the 310 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152,841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 310 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.323%
1 of 310 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
18,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
20,300
over 309 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjckH3tg122 October 202622 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 310 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,410 views109 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ахах, перепутали?

custom 523574368420443732293🤔16

6 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC≈8,590 views157 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Почему может встать член в мужской бане? Наткнулась на твит, где парень рассказал, что у него произошла эрекция прямо в мужской бане. И, судя по реакции автора, ситуация оказалась довольно неловкой. Но если разобраться, ничего сверхъестественного здесь нет Во-первых, эрекция не всегда означает сексуальное возбуждение. Мужской организм способен реагировать совершенно непроизвольно: иногда она возникает без фантазий,…

custom 5235743684204437322125custom 518818661943739543632

6 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈10,400 views682 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Фраза «у меня есть парень» мужиков не останавливает. «Я замужем» - тоже. И только фраза «я люблю деньги и подарки» работает безотказно💅

custom 5235743684204437322529custom 5188186619437395436139🤔14

6 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC≈11,700 views357 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Помогло?

custom 5235743684204437322302custom 518818661943739543640🤔15

5 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC≈13,500 views246 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Разбираем ваши вопросики: «Мне 20+, я ни разу не занималась сексом. Я что, опоздала?» Начну с главного: нет, вы ничего не упустили и никуда не опоздали. В 20 лет отсутствие сексуального опыта — совершенно нормальная ситуация. Не существует возраста, к которому человек обязан начать половую жизнь. Это не экзамен, который все должны сдать до определённой даты Мне кажется, здесь проблема даже не столько в отсутствии с…

custom 5188186619437395436227custom 523574368420443732213🤔6

5 Nov 2026, 14:23 UTC≈13,300 views457 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ору

custom 5235743684204437322436🤔14custom 51881866194373954367

5 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC≈13,700 views131 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Девочки, кто был любовницей? Что вы в итоге получили от этих отношений?

custom 518818661943739543673custom 523574368420443732234🤔24

5 Nov 2026, 05:22 UTC≈14,700 views735 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Меркантильные 🤣

custom 5235743684204437322658custom 518818661943739543677

4 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC≈15,000 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Пост для знакомств и общения. Как вы знаете, у нас каждую неделю выходит вечерний пост-чат. В комментариях можно себе кого-нибудь найти или поболтать на любую тему — секс, отношения, работа, жизнь и так далее. Можно даже просто рассказать о том, чем заняты в данный момент :)

custom 518818661943739543621custom 52357436842044373227

4 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC≈14,100 views138 reactionsread 7 November 2026

девочки, с каждой по ред флагу каких профессий мужчин даже не рассматривать для отношений

custom 518818661943739543691custom 523574368420443732240🤔7

4 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC≈15,400 views761 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

тредс принес нечто легендарное

custom 5235743684204437322692custom 518818661943739543657🤔12

4 Nov 2026, 06:48 UTC≈15,000 views602 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ред флаг? 😁

custom 5235743684204437322478custom 5188186619437395436113🤔11

Showing the 12 most recent of 310 posts we hold for @helga18plus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @helga18plus as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTCAnonymous Poll6,190 voters approx.

Вы смогли бы встречаться с человеком, который вам идеально подходит, но совершенно не возбуждает?

  1. Нет, без сексуального влечения не вижу смысла57%
  2. Да, со временем влечение может появиться19%
  3. Если люблю, секс не так важен8%
  4. Зависит от того, насколько сильные чувства17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Poll7,000 voters approx.

Вы бы простили измену, если бы точно знали, что партнёр больше никогда не повторит?

  1. Да, если люблю человека17%
  2. Нет, для меня это конец отношений44%
  3. Зависит от обстоятельств29%
  4. Простил(а) бы, но отношения уже не были бы прежними22%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTCAnonymous Poll4,280 voters approx.

Вы просите справку об отсутствии ЗППП перед сексом с новым партнёром?

  1. Да, обязательно29%
  2. Раньше не просил/а, теперь всегда20%
  3. Никогда не просил/а и не вижу в этом смысла29%
  4. Никогда не просил/а, но теперь жалею, надо было22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTCAnonymous Poll8,080 voters approx.

Девушки, если у вас есть лишние волосы на теле, вы откажетесь от секса?

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет42%
  3. Я мужчина, хочу посмотреть ответы31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTCAnonymous Poll7,370 voters approx.

Сколько раз в неделю вы занимаетесь сексом?

  1. Секса совсем нет последнее время33%
  2. 1-2 раза в неделю25%
  3. 3-4 раза в неделю11%
  4. Почти каждый день8%
  5. По-разному, стабильной частоты нет23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 310 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хельга, да” (@helga18plus), 138,656 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helga18plus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.