Александр и Людмила Дудоровы об инструментах фасилитации, повышении продуктивности команд и лидерстве в тотальной неопределённости. Мы привезли фасилитацию в Россию.
Для связи: [email protected]
Сессии и обучение: personalimage.ru
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,929–5,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 02:15
5,972
+5
1 Nov 2026, 09:50
5,967
-1
29 Oct 2026, 11:05
5,968
+4
26 Oct 2026, 04:05
5,964
-4
22 Oct 2026, 21:58
5,968
-2
19 Oct 2026, 12:37
5,970
+3
16 Oct 2026, 20:07
5,967
+4
13 Oct 2026, 16:46
5,963
-4
7 Oct 2026, 20:01
5,967
-1
30 Sept 2026, 23:18
5,968
+19
16 Sept 2026, 01:37
5,949
-2
12 Sept 2026, 18:21
5,951
+7
7 Sept 2026, 11:55
5,944
-1
3 Sept 2026, 00:56
5,945
+4
30 Aug 2026, 18:46
5,941
+5
28 Aug 2026, 03:33
5,936
-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:58
5,939
-4
22 Aug 2026, 10:56
5,943
+8
19 Aug 2026, 06:24
5,935
-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:24
5,939
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 5,972 subscribers
Avg views / post
603
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
30 (3 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
6,025
Reactions total
141
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,100
Videos
≈158
Links
≈486
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 00s
Average length
2m 00s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
417 reactions across 30 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
151
36.2%
❤
124
29.7%
👍
70
16.8%
🥰
29
6.95%
❤🔥
21
5.04%
🤣
16
3.84%
👏
5
1.20%
💯
1
0.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#тренды2026
А еще по итогам нашего с вами голосования по популярным типам сессий здесь в канале видна новая тенденция.
По сравнению с предыдущими годами в лидерство вышли Командные сессии. Это и про эффективность, и про доверие, и про выгорание. И вероятно связано с тем, что их проводят и сами руководители, и лидеры команд, HRBP, и коучи/фасилитаторы.
Как их проводить, все зависит от целей, моделей и навыков ведущего…
#тренды2026
От Людмилы Дудоровой
На Неделе фасилитации я рассказала про тренды фасилитации, которые мы сейчас наблюдаем.
Напишите, про какой тренд рассказать подробнее ( они перечислены на слайдах), Поставьте номер тренда под постом
#Инсайты
Со 2-го модуля курса «Мастер фасилитации», про ценность очного обучения фасилитации, от участников:
«Как только ты провел методику хотя бы один раз, протестировал ее возможности в нашей экологичной среде, отработал на себе, она ценность приобретает большую, чем просто описанная методика. Например, сегодня упражнение «Символы» сначала все по-детски выглядело, но потом оказалось, что рабочее, классное и приме…
Поздравляем опытных фасилитаторов, любителей и тех, кто только начинает с профессиональным праздником - Днем фасилитатора.
Он празднуется с День рождения Ассоциации фасилитаторов!
А Ассоциацию фасилитации поздравляем с первым 10-летием!
В пятницу, 16 октября, в Санкт-Петербурге прошла наша Игротека. Авторскую игру 🌟 Тучи сгущаются провела Людмила Дудорова!
Один из инсайтов встречи — за одним игровым столом собираются люди с разными целями и задачами. Кто-то ищет инструмент развития софт-навыков для бизнеса, кто-то — для женского сообщества, кто-то для спортивной команды.
И запросы порой звучат почти противоположно:
♻️ вдохновить — заставить задум…
Нам задают вопросы про программу Обучение действием / Action Learning делимся с вами полезными комментариями ведущего:
1️⃣Уникальность WIAL — конкретная методология, соединяющая решение проблемы, развитие лидеров и обучение команды.
Это сочетание обязательных 2-х правил и 6-ти компонентов:
🔵Утверждения допускаются только в ответ на вопрос, и право коуча вмешиваться, когда есть возможность для обучения.
🔵Реальная зн…
Друзья, мы решили провести Конкурс факапов фасилитатора, ведь на них учатся! Как минимум сами участники, а как максимум — еще и зрители.
Отбор самых смешных и самых поучительных факапов фасилитатора будет проводиться в три этапа:
1. Публикация Факапа (Краткого описания факапа) — в формате видео, видеокружок или текст — в комментариях к данному посту в канале Инструменты фасилитации или — в сообщении на почту Имидж …
Приглашаем всех желающих на Игротеку бизнес-игр в Санкт-Петербурге!
🚀 28 августа – 8 бизнес-игр за 4 часа
Вы сможете:
🎲 протестировать 8 игровых инструментов;
💡 понять, какие из них лучше всего подходят под ваши задачи;
🛠 разобрать, как использовать их в обучении, стратсессиях и командной работе;
🤝 обменяться опытом, идеями с коллегами.
В программе:
– 4 часа практики без скучной теории;
– 8 бизнес-игр с профессион…
✅ 7 шагов подготовки, которые спасут ваш онлайн-воркшоп
📧 Приветственное письмо за 2–3 дня
Отправьте участникам чёткую инструкцию, какие инструменты будут использоваться на воркшопе и что нужно установить, ссылки. Не пропускайте этот шаг – всем нужно разное время, чтобы привыкнуть к инструменту. Этот шаг сэкономит первые 20 минут воркшопа и снизит тревожность.
🤝 Ледоколы и обзор процесса
Для плавного хода нужно …
👍7❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @impergroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нестыдная фасилитация @no_shame_facilitation · 22,583 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
СберУниверситет @sber_university · 24,305 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
REFORUM @reforum · 18,743 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 5 October 2026
Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко @leadership_position · 27,449 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Skolkovo School of Management @skolkovo_channel · 43,455 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 28 August 2026
Филипп Гузенюк I Счастье в деятельности @guzenuk · 22,048 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 September 2026
Король Говорит! Ораторское @korolgovorit_school · 24,100 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Живое обучение @prolearning · 20,630 Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инструменты фасилитации” (@impergroup), 5,972 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impergroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.