Channel
@iraqnow4
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,329subscribers
-406 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001473854971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iraqnow4 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iraqnow4 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 23,329 | -19 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 23,348 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 23,362 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 23,373 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 23,395 | -38 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 23,433 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 23,459 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 23,478 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:06 | 23,494 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 23,504 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 23,510 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 23,516 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 23,521 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 23,534 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 23,540 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 23,553 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 23,561 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 23,576 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 23,593 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 23,601 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 51.6% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 18.8% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 4.69% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 3.13% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. ( هذه بعض فضائح ترامب ) 1- فشل ترامب بتغيير النظام الايراني. 2- فشل ترامب في الاستيلاء على النفط الايراني. 3- فشل ترامب في فتح مضيق هرمز بالقوة لان مفاتيح المضيق بيد الحرس الثوري. 4- فشل ترامب بتصفير صادرات النفط الايراني. 5- فشل ترامب في الرهان على الداخل الايراني و احداث انقلاب. 6- خسر ترامب جمهوره في اميركا و تآكلت قاعدته الشعبية. 7- فشل ترامب في حشد حلفائه الأوروبيين خلفه. 8- تحول ترامب من رجل الصفق…
❤23😁4👏3
الحـرس الثـوري : بعد رصد صواريخ أمريكية انطلقت من قاعدة الأمير سلطان الجوية يقصف في هذه اللحظات ذات القاعدة بعدد من صواريخ خرمشهر وخيبر يحذر الحرس الثوري وفي ظل التهديدات المستمرة بقصف منشآت الكهرباء والطاقة في ايران بأن اي رصد لصواريخ تجاهنا انطلاقاً من اي دولة عربية او اسرائيل وأمريكا سيقابل برد يتجاوز التوقعات.
👏4❤1
الحشد الشعبي: تعرض الفوج الرابع التابع للواء (52) ضمن قيادة عمليات الشمال وشرق دجلة إلى عدوان صهيو-أمريكي بضربتين جويتين في موقع مطار الحليوة بقضاء طوز خورماتو لم يسفر عن خسائر بشرية
عاجل | مسؤول أمني سياسي ایراني: أميركا اليوم فشلت في استراتيجيتها التي قامت على ما سمته بـ"الهجوم النظيف والسريع والسهل"
❤6
عاجل | المتحدث باسم مقر خاتم الأنبياء: سراب هزيمة إيران تحول إلى مستنقع تغرق فيه الولايات المتحدة
👏3
عاجل | المتحدث باسم مقر خاتم الأنبياء : في حال توسع الشر والضربات ضد البنى التحتية الإيرانية فإن المنطقة بأكملها ستتحول إلى جحيم للأعداء
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم إن إطلاق صواريخ (الكراد) على قواعد العدو ومعسكراته المتواجدة داخل مدينة بغداد يعرّض حياة المدنيين الأبرياء للخطر، وانطلاقاً من حرص المقاومة الإسلامية على سلامة أهلنا، فإننا نرفض استعمال هذا النوع من الأسلحة التي قد تؤدي إلى إيذاء السكان أو إلحاق الضرر بهم وبممتلكاتهم العامة. وفي الوقت نفسه، نؤكد أن وجود القوات الأمريكية داخل المدينة يشكّل مصدراً كبيراً للخطر على سكانها، مما يوجب على الحكومة ا…
❤1
وزارة الدفاع: إحباط محاولة إطلاق صواريخ كاتيوشا في كركوك
👏2
رئيس الوزراء العراقي يوافق على حذف الفصول غير المنجزة من المناهج الدراسية مراعاةً للظروف التي حالت دون إكمال الخطة الدراسية في عدد كبير من المدارس
❤10👏1😱1
عاجل | مصدر في الشرطة العراقية للجزيرة: قصف جوي يستهدف موقعا للحشد الشعبي في منطقة الرشيدية بالموصل
🤬6❤1😢1
المتحرش ترامب: الشرق الأوسط سيشهد تحولاً في المستقبل وسيكون مزدهراً ابو فخري ما يبطل چذب
😁16
بيان (17) صادر عن وزارة الداخلية العراقية...بفخر واعتزاز مكللين بالعز والكرامة، تنعى وزارة الداخلية اثنين من أبطالها الذين طالتهما يد العدوان الصهيواميركي الغادر
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iraqnow4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“العراق الآن - Iraq Now” (@iraqnow4), 23,329 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraqnow4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.