Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [جنآس]

Channel

[جنآس]

@jenasmedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,591subscribers

-420 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109896270
TypeChannel
Username@jenasmedia
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jenasmedia

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,59110,0119,8017 August 2026 — 10,011 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,996 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,958 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,914 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,875 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,859 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,796 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,776 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,753 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,721 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,664 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,626 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,591 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -420. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,528–10,074 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:579,591-35
11 Sept 2026, 17:159,626-38
7 Sept 2026, 05:189,664-57
2 Sept 2026, 08:179,721-32
30 Aug 2026, 18:249,753-23
27 Aug 2026, 18:569,776-20
24 Aug 2026, 12:059,796-63
20 Aug 2026, 14:089,859-16
17 Aug 2026, 20:179,875-39
14 Aug 2026, 10:289,914-44
11 Aug 2026, 04:019,958-38
8 Aug 2026, 11:579,996-15
7 Aug 2026, 14:1610,011first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.73%
avg views ÷ 9,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
358
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held68 (24 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total2,503
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 38s
Average length
4m 23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

727 reactions across 59 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49668.2%
👍18825.9%
💔314.26%
👎121.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 66 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jenasmedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC75 views4 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

🎥اسپند دود کن! گاهی اوقات آدم کاری را آنقدر خوب انجام می‌دهد که چشم می‌خورد. امروز خیلی خوش‌تیپ شدید؟ نگران نباشید طوری چشم می‌خورید که فردا نتوانید توی هم آینه به خودتان نگاه کنید. اول صبح فروش خوبی داشتید؟ صبر کنید چون بقیۀ روز حتی یک مشتری هم نمیاد. توی جمع از همسرتان کادوی حسابی گرفتید؟ تبریک می‌گم، فردا چنان دعوایی بین‌تان می‌شود که آن سرش ناپیداست. سفر خوبی داشتید و خیلی خوش به حالتان شده؟ راه برگشت طوری می‌شو

3👍1

28 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC282 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🧠 چرا برای انسان‌ها مهم است که دیگران چگونه به آن‌ها نگاه می‌کنند؟ در روان‌شناسی تکاملی، یکی از ایده‌های جالب پل گیلبرت (Paul Gilbert) این است که بخشی از ارزیابی ما از «خود» را می‌توان در تاریخ تکاملی رقابت اجتماعی جست‌وجو کرد. گیلبرت، جان پرایس و استیون آلن در مقاله‌ای در سال ۱۹۹۵ با عنوان: Social Comparison, Social Attractiveness and Evolution: How Might They Be Related? پیشنهاد کردند که مقایسهٔ اجتماعی انسان را

3👍2👎1

27 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC399 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔻پدیده سلسله مراتبی در کل دنیای حیوانات وجود دارد! عبارت ترتیب نوک زنی» در میان پرندگان یافت میشود وقتی پرندگان برای اولین بار دور هم جمع میشوند مرتبا با هم دعوا میکنند. اما با گذشت زمان دعوا فروکش میکند زیرا هر پرنده می آموزد که نسبت به برخی از پرندگان سلطه دارد، اما مطیع تعدادی دیگر از پرندگان است. این ترتیب نوک زنی به مرور پایدار میشود و برای هر پرنده، مزیتهایی دارد مزیتی که برای پرندگان مسلط دارد این است که مجب

5👍1

26 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC449 views15 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎥حافظه یک جای مغزه یا نه؟ یه مقاله‌ی تازه که چند روز پیش (اوت ۲۰۲۶) توی مجله‌ی معتبر Nature Neuroscience منتشر شده، یه پاسخ جالب به این سوال داده. محققا رفتن سراغ بیمارانی که به‌خاطر صرع، الکترودهای ریز داخل مغزشون کاشته شده بود (برای درمان). این فرصت نادر بهشون اجازه داد هم‌زمان از ۵ ناحیه‌ی مختلف مغز -هیپوکامپ، آمیگدال و چند بخش از قشر پیش‌پیشانی- فعالیت تک‌تک نورون‌ها رو ثبت کنن، در حالی که بیمارها یه بازی حافظه

10👍4👎1

26 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC369 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

حافظه در یک قسمت خاصی از مغز مدیریت میشود یا خیر؟

  1. در یک جای مغز که مسئول حافظه است40%
  2. در جاهای مختلف38%
  3. نمیدانم22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC450 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

😄تاپیک "کتابخوانی" ایجاد شد... علاقه‌مندان میتوانند بخشی از کتاب ها یا مقالاتی که مطالعه میکنند را برای سایر دوستان در تاپیک کتابخوانی در قالب یک یا چند فایل صوتی ارسال کنند. برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر و شرکت در این پویش، روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید. @Jenasmedia_group همچنین مایه امتنان است از دوستان خود جهت شرکت در این جلسات دعوت کنید.🪴 💠 رسانه علوم انسانی [جنآس] | #بیندیش

5

25 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC479 views6 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

عموزاده!؟ 💠 رسانه علوم انسانی [جنآس] | #بیندیش

6

24 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC602 views12 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

ایرانی‌ها یک وسواس جالبی نسبت به تاریخ دارن؛ مدام دنبال یک نفر در گذشته می‌گردن که بگن ببین! این یارو "درست فهمیده بود، درست زندگی کرده بود و راه درست رو نشان داده بود" گویی اگر بتونند یک آدم رو از گذشته‌ای به اندازه پرانتزی از پنجاه سال تا چندهزارسال پیش بیرون بکشن و به خودشون و دیگران ثابت کنن که او دقیقا همون چیزی رو می‌گفته که امروز قبول دارن، خیالشون راحت می‌شه که حق باهاشون بوده. که این شیوه‌ی فکر کردن اساسا غل

9👍3

22 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC548 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

گروه را به دوستان خود معرفی کنید🪴 👆https://t.me/Jenasmedia_group

👍5

22 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC602 views9 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

⚠️با سلام و درود؛ گروه تلگرامی جنآس با هدف گسترده تر شدن موضوعات و گسترش فعالیت در آینده به «انجمن | Forum» تبدیل خواهد شد که در آن «موضوعات | Topic» های مختلفی جول موضوع روانشناسی قرار خواهد گرفت. از توجه شما کمال تشکر را داریم 💠 رسانه علوم انسانی [جنآس] | #بیندیش

👍72

22 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC647 views5 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

🔻تعارض راهبردی چیست؟ روانشناسان تکامل‌گرا تعارض میان دو جنس را پیش‌بینی کرده‌اند، اما نه به این دلیل که مردان و زنان برای منابع تولیدمثلی یکسانی رقابت می‌کنند، بلکه بسیاری از خاستگاه‌های تعارض میان آنان را می‌توان در تفاوت‌های تکاملی در راهبردهای جنسی در نظر گرفت. در هر دو جنس راهبردهای همسرگزینی کوتاه‌مدت و درازمدتی تکامل یافته است، اما ماهیت این راهبردها برای دو جنس متفاوت است. یکی از مهم‌ترین تفاوت‌ها در راهبرده

4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @jenasmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

حافظه در یک قسمت خاصی از مغز مدیریت میشود یا خیر؟

  1. در یک جای مغز که مسئول حافظه است40%
  2. در جاهای مختلف38%
  3. نمیدانم22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTCAnonymous Poll147 voters

بیشتر به چه نوع محتوایی علاقه مندید؟

  1. متنی (طولانی)37%
  2. متنی (کوتاه)72%
  3. عکس / ویدیو29%
  4. فایل صوتی (کوتاه)16%
  5. فایل صوتی (بلند)12%

The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll61 voters

📆 آخر هفته جاری بحثی در تالار گفتگو داشته باشیم؟

  1. 👍🏻84%
  2. 👎🏻16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Poll129 voters

🧐اگر کسی به ما بگوید که این حیوان از خویشاوندان ژنتیکی ماست ناراحت میشویم؟

  1. بله15%
  2. خیر85%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

به کدام موضوع علاقه بیشتری دارید؟

  1. روانشناسی تکاملی38%
  2. روانشناسی اجتماعی43%
  3. اقتصاد رفتاری15%
  4. روانشناسی بالینی42%
  5. سایر9%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

با کدام موضوع زیر بیشتر آشنا هستید؟

  1. روانشناسی تکاملی21%
  2. روانشناسی اجتماعی53%
  3. اقتصاد رفتاری (اقتصاد+روانشناسی)20%
  4. روانشناسی بالینی38%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[جنآس]” (@jenasmedia), 9,591 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenasmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.