Channel
@jqofa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
61,922subscribers
-475 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001053572975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jqofa |
| Description | реклама: @che_reklama_bot менеджеры: @spiral_miya, @youaresickk, @aIphariusomegon, @pocpm_bot |
| Created | 2 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jqofa |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 61,922 | -46 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 61,968 | -45 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 62,013 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 62,049 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:43 | 62,069 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 62,085 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 62,103 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 62,118 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 62,120 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 62,141 | +20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 62,121 | -27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 62,148 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 62,178 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 62,192 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 62,218 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 62,235 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 62,255 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 62,265 | -24 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 62,289 | -26 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 62,315 | first reading |
127 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (31 July 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 754,660 |
| Reactions total | 20,141 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 11:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29,694 reactions across 123 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5362082225980459390 | 11,609 | 39.1% | |
| custom 5267320515692874175 | 7,334 | 24.7% | |
| custom 6032969427719294302 | 3,554 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5366428213192961852 | 3,247 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5402462791237904853 | 1,850 | 6.23% | |
| custom 5460647142693547014 | 1,225 | 4.13% | |
| custom 5334716760249613290 | 875 | 2.95% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,580 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jqofa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 127 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2chvkvgnrjqofa282 | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
учёные вскрыли мой череп, чтобы узнать, что там внутри.
custom 533471676024961329038custom 536208222598045939022custom 603296942771929430212custom 52673205156928741758custom 54024627912379048535custom 53664282131929618523
училка: два чего? яблока? апельсина? я:
custom 5402462791237904853123custom 536208222598045939058custom 526732051569287417517custom 53664282131929618528custom 60329694277192943023custom 53347167602496132901
когда уговариваешь хлеб нарезаться.
custom 533471676024961329084custom 536208222598045939049custom 603296942771929430214custom 53664282131929618526custom 54024627912379048533custom 52673205156928741752
я: да где этот блядский клитор?? она:
custom 5362082225980459390172custom 536642821319296185218custom 54024627912379048532
спят усталые законы, путин спит, нищета, убийства, войны, вич и спид.
custom 5362082225980459390229custom 526732051569287417561custom 536642821319296185233custom 603296942771929430210custom 54024627912379048535
когда проснулся в 2004-м и понимаешь, что эти 22 года были одним длинным сюрреалистическим сном.
custom 6032969427719294302178custom 526732051569287417573custom 536208222598045939034custom 536642821319296185211custom 54024627912379048533
настоящий джентльмен должен: 1. переводить через дорогу отрыжку. 2. пропускать девушек вперед на конвейере в мясокомбинате. 3. не чавкать ногтями. 4. одалживать замерзшей женщине свою ушную серу. 5. выковыривать изо рта кусок мяса, а потом пристально смотреть на него, как бы намекая, что он поступил неправильно. 6. вставлять флешку, предварительно смазав порт слюной. 7. не хвастаться чиреем на яйцах (если он невероя…
custom 536208222598045939094custom 526732051569287417521custom 603296942771929430210custom 53664282131929618526custom 54024627912379048534
римляне в альтернативной вселенной: *валяются на голгофе с пулевыми ранениями* иисус в альтернативной вселенной:
custom 540246279123790485372custom 536642821319296185253custom 53620822259804593907custom 52673205156928741752
АХАХАХАХАХАХАХ
custom 526732051569287417530custom 53620822259804593909custom 54024627912379048537
братва, у меня молоко зависло на отметке 3,2 процента и дальше не загружается. кто сталкивался с такой проблемой?
custom 5362082225980459390212custom 603296942771929430259custom 526732051569287417523custom 536642821319296185211custom 54024627912379048535
когда после бурной вечеринки просыпаешься где-то на окраине уфы и идёшь обратно домой в москву.
custom 5402462791237904853154custom 536208222598045939043custom 536642821319296185222custom 526732051569287417510custom 60329694277192943023
тот самый чел в фильме ужасов, который скрывает от своих друзей, что его укусил зомби:
custom 6032969427719294302165custom 526732051569287417567custom 536208222598045939023custom 536642821319296185213custom 53347167602496132902custom 54024627912379048532
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @jqofa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@jqofa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“че” (@jqofa), 61,922 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jqofa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.